Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seymour Hersh has been coming under alot of fire since he won his pulitzer for not actually being able to cite his sources as anything but anonymous... the vast majority of his pieces come from anonymous sources
while protecting your sources is paramount to journalism... when your entire career is begining to rest on people that may or may not exist; people will ask questions
many on the right took as gospel a single unnamed indian that the Obama trip cost 200 million a day to India
and now they do the same for someone who has been described thusly
"As soon as he has made an assertion he cites a 'source' to back it. In every case this is either an un-named former official or an unidentified secret document passed to Hersh in unknown circumstances... By my count Hersh has anonymous 'sources' inside 30 foreign governments and virtually every department of the U.S. government."
Anonymous sources are fine as far as it leads to evidence to support the claim. Other than that it is hearsay and not worth the time it takes to read.
the WH hasn't shown proof either
and had the Seals killed
No proof of that
it's BB's MO... " believe what I say, not what is true"
No proof of that
you OBVIOUSLY didn't read any of the stories out there
Yeah I read them. But I deal in facts not flights of fancy. Almost any incident that occurs can be turned on its ear, but those with brains can see behind the curtain.