non-sexy underwear

[sweetnpetite]

Worst case: you're sober and/or drunk enough to think, "I'll leave these here; I'll bet they're even flushable." Fortunately, you remembered to forget to shave your legs. A crop of leg stubble can act like emergency brakes.

But then you remember that men aren't that picky and he's probably too drunk to notice anyway.

 

[cantdog]

But then you remember that men aren't that picky and he's probably too drunk to notice anyway.

You have a low opinion of me. I am very sensitive to context and nuance. I just override it in order to fuck.

 

[shereads]

I am very sensitive to context and nuance. I just override it in order to fuck.

<------ several of these and high-fives

 

[Mari J]

How strongly is underwear linked to sex for you?

For me, underwear is about sex, but it's not about what it looks like. It's about reaching into it, or slipping it off, or it's absence in the first place.

 

[shereads]

I'm with ogg.

It's the person inside the underwear that's sexy.

That's true to an extent. But underwear, like body language, can send a message. If your date's underwear has something to say, would it be wise not to listen?

I'm not talking about printed messages, like "Breakfast of Champions" on a pair of briefs. In the right context, those might be amusing or even a turn-on (by "context," I mean "George Clooney.") No, I'm referring to the less overt messages that underwear can communicate to a good listener. Even Clooney, armed with a bottle of French champagne and a private jet bound for his villa at Lake Como, would fail to score if he stripped down to his Aunt Rosemary's girdle and stockings.

His allegation that Rosemary Clooney wore that very girdle beneath her show-stealing black sequinned sheath dress in "White Christmas" might earn George a few minutes of fellatio. But only if he could prove the girdle's authenticity by matching Bing Crosby's dental records to the bite marks.

 

[SonOfAGhost]

White cotton of couse he's ok with, but lavender cotton, polka-dots, animited characters like Tigger, ect

It may not be so much about "sexy" underwear as "woman's" underwear. I know a couple guys that get extremely creeped out if, while undressing a partner, find her to be wearing something that resembles what a child might wear. I think most of us have no problem with a woman choosing to wear something a bit more "fun" but I can see where my friends are coming from. It may not be entirely rational but at least their heart is in the right place.

Personally I don't think I've had a 1st hand encounter with women's underwear that wasn't sexy. Afterall, by the time I'm seeing it, it's a bit of a tease, the anticipation of it's removal. Not that I don't have some favourite styles

 

[elfin_odalisque]

Awww! Hugs for oggy.

Shucks! You've fallen for the old line again.

And Oggy Bear does it all the time.

 

[oggbashan]

Shucks! You've fallen for the old line again.

And Oggy Bear does it all the time.

And I like it

Og

 

[kendo1]

I've got hairy legs and I've never been turned down.
Still, I prefer to see a woman in a thong, whether it's comfortable or not!
I reckon they must have been invented specially for me.

 

[yui]

His allegation that Rosemary Clooney wore that very girdle beneath her show-stealing black sequinned sheath dress in "White Christmas" might earn George a few minutes of fellatio. But only if he could prove the girdle's authenticity by matching Bing Crosby's dental records to the bite marks.

Bwahahahaha!




I have lots of fun panties that, after reading this thread, might creep some guys out. Maybe it's a quasi-cultural for me; "cute" is the thing for Japanese girls to be, and I think a bit of that mentality haunts me. So you're telling me I should ditch the Hello Kitty bikinis, eh?

 

[Liar]

I have lots of fun panties that, after reading this thread, might creep some guys out. Maybe it's a quasi-cultural for me; "cute" is the thing for Japanese girls to be, and I think a bit of that mentality haunts me. So you're telling me I should ditch the Hello Kitty bikinis, eh?

If there is one thing I like more than a woman in a bikini, it's a woman out of a bikini.

But no... I'm in the camp that says funny is sexy. A thing that has never done it for me is elaborate lace lingerie thingys. They have no personality. And it's all about the person.

But then again, as pointed out, the right lady will look good in anything.

 

[arienette]

Again, I don't understand this reasoning. Unshaven legs or unattractive underwear have NEVER entered my mind in a moment when sex was a possibility. Partly because I usually don't shave my legs, I let my sex partners accept my body the way it is, and trust me, no man I've ever been with has turned me down because I have hairy legs!
And as for the underwear, pft! They're supposed to be hitting the floor in nano-seconds, so who cares?

I don't need to fix myself up before having sex, I feel sexy anyway, and let's face it, you're gonna have to be DAMNED ugly and disgusting for a man to not find you sexy as hell when he's got your naked body under his.

I love you.
I feel the same way about unshaven legs, etc.

However, about the undies -- I love my fun undies! I have several pairs of just bikini cotton ones with stars, hearts, stripes, etc. and I love them. The boyfriend doesn't mind what kind of undies I have on because they are going to be hitting the floor and anymore when my legs are shaved he thinks it's a special occassion or something. It's great.

 

[yui]

If there is one thing I like more than a woman in a bikini, it's a woman out of a bikini.

But no... I'm in the camp that says funny is sexy. A thing that has never done it for me is elaborate lace lingerie thingys. They have no personality. And it's all about the person.

But then again, as pointed out, the right lady will look good in anything.

I'll keep the Hello panties, then.

I feel like I'm wearing someone else's underpants when I'm wearing elaborate lace thingys; someone else's uncomfortable underpants. Although I do like rumba panties and I have some spiffy camisoles ... mostly it's cotton tanks and fun panties; they're soft to the touch.

 

[kinky shy girl]

I usually wear "plain" underwear...cotton briefs or boyshorts. I only wear the thong or g-string when he asks me to. We call them my "2 minute undies." He admires them for 2 minutes, and then they're off.

I saw Hello Kitty panties the other day, and they were really cute.

 

[Huckleman2000]

I've got hairy legs and I've never been turned down.
Still, I prefer to see a woman in a thong, whether it's comfortable or not!
I reckon they must have been invented specially for me.

I've got a hairy back, and I've been turned down plenty...

Again, I don't understand this reasoning. Unshaven legs or unattractive underwear have NEVER entered my mind in a moment when sex was a possibility. Partly because I usually don't shave my legs, I let my sex partners accept my body the way it is, and trust me, no man I've ever been with has turned me down because I have hairy legs!
And as for the underwear, pft! They're supposed to be hitting the floor in nano-seconds, so who cares?
I don't need to fix myself up before having sex, I feel sexy anyway, and let's face it, you're gonna have to be DAMNED ugly and disgusting for a man to not find you sexy as hell when he's got your naked body under his.

True enough. Now let me turn the tables, and say "I don't need to fix myself up before having sex, I feel sexy anyway, and let's face it, you're gonna have to be DAMNED ugly and disgusting for a woman to not find you sexy as hell when she's got her naked body under yours."

I'll keep the Hello panties, then.

No. Lose the Hello Kitty panties. All the rest, you're okay, but Hello Kitty takes 'cute' into 'lost in translation' when it covers your .

I don't mean to be anti-multi-cultural; I'm just saying...

 

[sweetnpetite]

It may not be so much about "sexy" underwear as "woman's" underwear. I know a couple guys that get extremely creeped out if, while undressing a partner, find her to be wearing something that resembles what a child might wear. I think most of us have no problem with a woman choosing to wear something a bit more "fun" but I can see where my friends are coming from. It may not be entirely rational but at least their heart is in the right place.

Personally I don't think I've had a 1st hand encounter with women's underwear that wasn't sexy. Afterall, by the time I'm seeing it, it's a bit of a tease, the anticipation of it's removal. Not that I don't have some favourite styles

If there were so, how come the same guys don't mind a girl being completly shaved?

 

[SeaCat]

My wife just picked up some new ones with cute sayings as well as cutesy little pictures on them. No big deal to me and if she likes them then great.

She doesn't like lace and such, she finds it uncomfortable. (Hell her favorite bras are sport Bras.)

Me I look at underwear like this. It's something that one wears to be comfortable. If a woman is sexy she can be wearing a Burlap Bag and still be sexy. If she's not wearing any that's fine too. What the hell, she's going to be coming out of it as soon as I can manage it anyways.

I just asked her what her favorite Panties were. She said; "Womens Boxers". (So that's what those are called.) Look good on my wofe as well as comfortable. (They are a bit tighter than my boxers. )

Cat

 

[SonOfAGhost]

If there were so, how come the same guys don't mind a girl being completly shaved?

I have no idea what those 2 individuals thought of shaved beaver. Personally I think bald is beautiful, but then I don't have a problem with the 'fun' underwear either. I hear there are those that prefer a thick jungle down there, but to the best of my knowledge their ranks, don't include any men that I know. I think most of the women that actually are hairless are a bit younger though

 

[yui]

If there were so, how come the same guys don't mind a girl being completly shaved?

I have no idea what those 2 individuals thought of shaved beaver. Personally I think bald is beautiful, but then I don't have a problem with the 'fun' underwear either. I hear there are those that prefer a thick jungle down there, but to the best of my knowledge their ranks, don't include any men that I know. I think most of the women that actually are hairless are a bit younger though

I think issues are getting kind of confused here. I know the simple fact that a smooth chest, on certain men, is attractive to me, doesn't mean I find pre-pubescent boys sexually arousing; and I don't think that fact that I have a bald crotch means I'm trying to appeal to closet pedophiles; and I don't think men that are aroused by a woman's bare, hairless, sex means that they want to screw little girls. JMHO.

Sweets, for your hypothesis to be completely unbiased you would have to presume that lesbians who find a bare snatch attractive are attracted to little girls, too. (And I personally don't think that is true, either.)

And SonofGhost, "shaved beaver" makes a lovely, if politically incorrect coat, but it's far from bald. Welcome to the AH!

 

[woodnymph_O]

I didn't start wearing thongs until about 4 years ago,,until then it was tweety bird bikinis and such.. and I'm 28 ,, I guess I can be a little slow to change
Nymphy