Nirvana's Nevermind

[FataMorgana]

The baby on the cover is now sueing for child exploitation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-58327844

 

[adrina]

If they can't produce a sign off on the rights to that pic, they could be in some trouble.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

His dad authorized the pic for $200 at the time. The kid literally did a signing tour claiming he was the kid from Nevermind as his selling point. Fuck that twatwaffle.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

He has nevermind tattooed across his chest and re-created the photo many times in his life. It was a badge of honour until he needed cash. Fuck him

 

[FataMorgana]

Exactly. Fuckhead.

 

[adrina]

Ewww... that's not cool. Did not know that. Eh, no surprise - I don't follow them - Nirvana sucks.

They still better have the document though if they want it ironclad.

 

[FataMorgana]

I preferred Pearl Jam but I really liked 'em.

 

[adrina]

My sister was more into that style than I ever was. I didn't listen to Pearl Jam either. Just never cared for that sound much. A little goes a long way.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

I passed a joint to Norm from Cheers at a Nirvana show.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

I got my BFF high for the first time on the way to a Pearl Jam show. The Butthole Surfers opened.

 

[spacekowboy]

Pearl Jam was never my jam. Still that way.

Nirvana, however I have grown to appreciate in my old age. I didn't so much when they were the thing.

 

[spacekowboy]

Also this is a cash grab and nothing more. Fuck that little shitbag.

 

[rockcasbah]

It’s the perfect story, really.

GenX hero band exploits and sexualizes a baby.

Millennial victim baby wants to get rich and famous.

 

[Lancedalot]

Also, I remember years ago that dude Eyer pointing out the very same about this album's cover.

And then all the usual demented suspects championing the cover so much and so against the rules that Laurelle finally lost it, blasted them, her pets, for it, and quit posting on the GB forevermore.

Good times!

 

[Lazaran]

.
Only a very sick mind would confer a sexual connotation or exploitation to that photo.

JFC

 

[Earthlyone]

The baby on the cover is now sueing for child exploitation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-58327844

There is a delicious irony to that image now.

 

[Earthlyone]

.
Only a very sick mind would confer a sexual connotation or exploitation to that photo.

JFC

The grown up baby is just a fucking loser who didn't have the gumption to capitalise wisely and properly from his association with Nirvana, so he's gone down this shitty route.

 

[rockcasbah]

The grown up baby is just a fucking loser who didn't have the gumption to capitalise wisely and properly from his association with Nirvana, so he's gone down this shitty route.

Most of Dave Grohl’s baby entourage have their own agents now.

 

[Biggs_Darklighter]

Man, fuck that dude. It's such an obvious cash grab attempt. He woulda been better off selling pictures of his dick alongside the album cover. I mean assuming it's grown since then.

 

[bellisarius]

It’s the perfect story, really.

GenX hero band exploits and sexualizes a baby.

Millennial victim baby wants to get rich and famous.

Kinda a new age Robert Ford story unfolding here. May his fame and fortune be as fleeting.

 

[FataMorgana]

.
Only a very sick mind would confer a sexual connotation or exploitation to that photo.

JFC

Exactly.

 

[rockcasbah]

Did anyone ever really buy a Nirvana album for the “music”?

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Did anyone ever really buy a Nirvana album for the “music”?

Did you buy it to gaze at the baby dick?

 

[rockcasbah]

Did you buy it to gaze at the baby dick?

30,000,000 of you did, it seems…they’re certainly no Nickelback.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

30,000,000 of you did, it seems…they’re certainly no Nickelback.

Remember when you were witty? Me neither.