New low for Jim Acosta

[icanhelp1]

Jim Acosta’s fake AI interview with a dead person from a school shooting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/05/jim-acosta-joaquin-oliver-parkland-ai/

https://www.livenowfox.com/news/jim-acosta-ai-parkland-interview

Ex-CNN correspondent Jim Acosta interviews AI avatar of deceased Parkland shooting victim​

 

[Rebel5soul]

Too fucking weird for words.

 

[HisArpy]

Someone is going to get sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

 

[schism666]

fake AI

jeebus

 

[Rebel5soul]

Someone is going to get sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

If he did it with permission of the family I think he's clear legally.

 

[ll74]

From the article

The AI recreation was developed by Oliver’s parents, who invited Acosta to be the first journalist to interview it. Acosta spoke with Joaquin’s father, Manuel Oliver, during the video and told him, "I really felt like I was speaking with Joaquin. It’s just a beautiful thing."

 

[coati]

Hey, cool, Jim Acosta and the victim's father stimulated a conversation about senseless gun proliferation and gun violence in America.

And they hurt the feelings of some Lit MAGAts.

Well done, Jim!

 

[Lazaran]

Jim Acosta’s fake AI interview with a dead person from a school shooting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/08/05/jim-acosta-joaquin-oliver-parkland-ai/

https://www.livenowfox.com/news/jim-acosta-ai-parkland-interview

Ex-CNN correspondent Jim Acosta interviews AI avatar of deceased Parkland shooting victim​

ineedhelp1 (a total POS MAGAt) KNOWS that the parents of one of the child victims of the Parkland shooter / shooting were the ones who created the simulation, and that THEY REQUESTED that Jim Acosta participate in the simulated interview, yet ineedhelp1 posts defamatory / slanderous comments about Jim Acosta.



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[HisArpy]

If he did it with permission of the family I think he's clear legally.

If is a very big word for being only 2 letters. I haven't heard either way but I suspect that if he had that permission, he'd be right out front shouting it as loud as he could.

If he doesn't he's bankrupt. So is his network.

 

[ll74]

If is a very big word for being only 2 letters. I haven't heard either way but I suspect that if he had that permission, he'd be right out front shouting it as loud as he could.

If he doesn't he's bankrupt. So is his network.

It's in the fucking article. You haven't heard because you haven't read the article posted in the first post of this thread.

 

[icanhelp1]

If he did it with permission of the family I think he's clear legally.

The parents created the AI generated avatar, but to use it to project, promote a political narrative on a fake pretense is weird at best. Using a dead relative to create a narrative, an interview of sorts which promotes the opinion or belief of the creator and not necessarily the opinion of the dead relative is creating a perception not based in reality. It’s one thing to repeat factual verbiage that was previously recorded is one thing. A case in point to use the avatar of a cancer patient who passed and to reverberate past narratives from that patient him/herself cautioning cigarette smoking is deadly is an accurate portrayal of the individual, not some fake creation of a message someone else has using a dead persons image. IMHO

In my opinion Acosta is bringing attention to himself, that’s what he is.

 

[ll74]

The parents created the AI generated avatar, but to use it to project, promote a political narrative on a fake pretense is weird at best. Using a dead relative to create a narrative, an interview of sorts which promotes the opinion or belief of the creator and not necessarily the opinion of the dead relative is creating a perception not based in reality. It’s one thing to repeat factual verbiage that was previously recorded is one thing. A case in point to use the avatar of a cancer patient who passed and to reverberate past narratives from that patient him/herself cautioning cigarette smoking is deadly is an accurate portrayal of the individual, not some fake creation of a message someone else has using a dead persons image. IMHO

Read your own article.
They asked Acosta to do it.

 

[ll74]

If you post an article, read it first. JFC, idiot

The AI recreation was developed by Oliver’s parents, who invited Acosta to be the first journalist to interview it.

 

[icanhelp1]

Read your own article.
They asked Acosta to do it.

I did read the fucking article, I can’t tell parents what to do but I disagree how they did it. Putting words in a dead persons mouth to promote a message that may not be the actual beliefs of that person is weird. Acosta only thinks of himself, he’s a phony.

 

[ll74]

I did read the fucking article, I can’t tell parents what to do but I disagree how they did it. Putting words in a dead persons mouth to promote a message that may not be the actual beliefs of that person is weird. Acosta only thinks of himself, he’s a phony.

No you didn't.

 

[icanhelp1]

No you didn't.

Fuck off. I also watched Acosta’s avatar interview, it was fucking creepy.

 

[ll74]

Fuck off. I also watched Acosta’s avatar interview, it was fucking creepy.

I quoted the shit you ignored from your article.

They approached him to do the interview.

 

[icanhelp1]

I quoted the shit you ignored from your article.

They approached him to do the interview.

I know they did. Below would be a more appropriate interview. This is my opinion.

In response to the video, one user on the social platform Bluesky wrote: "There are living survivors of school shootings you could interview, and it would really be their words and thoughts instead of completely made-up.

 

[ll74]

I know they did. Below would be a more appropriate interview. This is my opinion.

In response to the video, one user on the social platform Bluesky wrote: "There are living survivors of school shootings you could interview, and it would really be their words and thoughts instead of completely made-up.

Your article explains that the parents approached Acosta to do the interview.

What part of that is confusing?

They were involved from the start on this effort.

 

[Bray123]

Never mind that fake outrage. Here's Trump saying that Epstein Island was a cesspool and he knows because he went there.

Click and sound on!

https://imgur.com/FCSWUjr

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Creating artificial news is 100% on brand for Jim Acosta.

 

[icanhelp1]

Your article explains that the parents approached Acosta to do the interview.

What part of that is confusing?

They were involved from the start on this effort.

Can you fucking read? My opinion is the parents did an injustice and Acosta is a phony pretend journalist.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Creating artificial news is 100% on brand for Jim Acosta.

BabyBoom ignores the facts and applies moronic spin, as usual.

 

[Rebel5soul]

The parents created the AI generated avatar, but to use it to project, promote a political narrative on a fake pretense is weird at best. Using a dead relative to create a narrative, an interview of sorts which promotes the opinion or belief of the creator and not necessarily the opinion of the dead relative is creating a perception not based in reality. It’s one thing to repeat factual verbiage that was previously recorded is one thing. A case in point to use the avatar of a cancer patient who passed and to reverberate past narratives from that patient him/herself cautioning cigarette smoking is deadly is an accurate portrayal of the individual, not some fake creation of a message someone else has using a dead persons image. IMHO

In my opinion Acosta is bringing attention to himself, that’s what he is.

I've given up trying to make sense of nonsense. Whatever the reason that the parents did what they did is flat macabre. There are precedents for a parent(s) to lose their mind over the tragic loss of a child, Mary Todd Lincoln comes to mind, but feeding that mental illness is cruel.

 

[icanhelp1]

I've given up trying to make sense of nonsense. Whatever the reason that the parents did what they did is flat macabre. There are precedents for a parent(s) to lose their mind over the tragic loss of a child, Mary Todd Lincoln comes to mind, but feeding that mental illness is cruel.

Hard to tell the difference from Charlie McCarthy, Charlie being an avatar. Sad.