Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
to clarify
//pure: how did you rule out that she was(is) not pregnant from the previous occasions?//
sss: Good questions all, which should be discussed with a visit to an OB/GYN.
---
true, though any GP would do. my point, however, was that to administer the MAP in the absence of consideration of pregnancy-already-there is not a good idea. that MAP was used, has been stated; whether a medical consultation or any tests occurred (before MAP) has not. wildcard is doing well in playing 'catch up' and has been very humane, IMO, but some details need to be addressed.
//pure: how did you rule out that she was(is) not pregnant from the previous occasions?//
sss: Good questions all, which should be discussed with a visit to an OB/GYN.
---
true, though any GP would do. my point, however, was that to administer the MAP in the absence of consideration of pregnancy-already-there is not a good idea. that MAP was used, has been stated; whether a medical consultation or any tests occurred (before MAP) has not. wildcard is doing well in playing 'catch up' and has been very humane, IMO, but some details need to be addressed.