Tzara
Continental
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Posts
- 7,782
Okay. Here's another sonnet, or perhaps "sonnet":
Sonnet
Terrance Hayes
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
Source: Hip Logic (2002)
Earlier I had posted Hayes's poem "The Golden Shovel," with which he created a new poetry form, one that has found significant acceptance by other writers. "Sonnet" is something quite different, being ostensibly a poem written in one of the older and more traditional forms. Does it fit the form? Well, it's 14 lines, rhymed (though in monorhyme), and in impeccable iambic pentameter. There is no volta or turn, at least not an obvious one, though the continual repetition of the line might be said to evoke a somewhat changing perspective of the poem, if only because of fatigue.
One could argue based on the stanza breaks that this is a Shakespearean sonnet (three quatrains follwed by a closing couplet), but why bother? What, in fact, is the point of this poem? Is it parody? Satire? Is it even a poem, let alone a sonnet?
Harvard professor and poet Stephanie Burt has said of this poem that "[o]ther Black poets still view the sonnet with suspicion, as a form made by privileged white folks, an ill-fitting mask." Is that what's going on here? That it's some kind of criticism of a form that came into prominence through the writing of old white guys?
I have no idea, but it makes me think of the kinds of things conceptual artists produce, where the object is to make the viewer/reader think.
Sonnet
Terrance Hayes
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
We sliced the watermelon into smiles.
Source: Hip Logic (2002)
One could argue based on the stanza breaks that this is a Shakespearean sonnet (three quatrains follwed by a closing couplet), but why bother? What, in fact, is the point of this poem? Is it parody? Satire? Is it even a poem, let alone a sonnet?
Harvard professor and poet Stephanie Burt has said of this poem that "[o]ther Black poets still view the sonnet with suspicion, as a form made by privileged white folks, an ill-fitting mask." Is that what's going on here? That it's some kind of criticism of a form that came into prominence through the writing of old white guys?
I have no idea, but it makes me think of the kinds of things conceptual artists produce, where the object is to make the viewer/reader think.