G
Guest
Guest
Evolution of human physiognomy is strongly influenced by the environment.
Inuit(eskimo-ice age huter gatherers e.g. Native Americans, The Far Eastern Asians etc. Anyone with less facial hair, really) has stockier torso and shorter limbs compared to Masai worrier who has slimer torso and longer limbs. This is because Inuit's body has less surface area than Masai's. Storage or reducing body heat is the key here. Larger the surface area of a body, heat is disparced more efficiently.
According to this theory, it follows that Inuit has shorter, fat cock while Masai has long slim cock.
I can't say I have the empirical data for Inuit's cock being short and fat.
I do hear the legend of long, fat blaco cock (Black Snake is an empirical data)
My hypothesis is this: Black men's cock got fatter because black women's cunts are big and loose.
I do not have the empirical data, therefore my statement above is not a theory.
Inuit(eskimo-ice age huter gatherers e.g. Native Americans, The Far Eastern Asians etc. Anyone with less facial hair, really) has stockier torso and shorter limbs compared to Masai worrier who has slimer torso and longer limbs. This is because Inuit's body has less surface area than Masai's. Storage or reducing body heat is the key here. Larger the surface area of a body, heat is disparced more efficiently.
According to this theory, it follows that Inuit has shorter, fat cock while Masai has long slim cock.
I can't say I have the empirical data for Inuit's cock being short and fat.
I do hear the legend of long, fat blaco cock (Black Snake is an empirical data)
My hypothesis is this: Black men's cock got fatter because black women's cunts are big and loose.
I do not have the empirical data, therefore my statement above is not a theory.
