more science ?

[Handley_Page]

THIS is an interesting bit of news.

It seems that the more scientifically educated you are, the less likely you are to believe all that political cr@p about Global Warming and stuff.

 

[trysail]

HP-

The CRU/UEA Keith Briffa Yamal fiasco is also boiling over with lots of backing and filling by the folk who published papers claiming unprecedented temperatures on the basis of an absurdly small sample of tree rings from Russia's Yamal Peninsula.


See the 2nd graph on p. 3 of: http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstatements/rebuttalsandcorrections/yamal


They are slowly, but perceptibly, backing down so as to save face and what remains of their reputations.



Andrew Montford ( author of The Hockey Stick Illusion: Climategate and the Corruption of Science ) has a nice summary at:
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2012/5/29/tim-osborn-responds-to-the-yamal-furore.html


with seminal background at:
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/29/the-yamal-implosion.html

 

[R. Richard]

Interesting. However, was unable to find a Page 3 girl in the Register.

 

[Handley_Page]

Interesting. However, was unable to find a Page 3 girl in the Register.

Sadly, the Register is not that sort of news organ.
However, if you'd care to look HERE, I think you'll find some suitable material.

 

[R. Richard]

Sadly, the Register is not that sort of news organ.
However, if you'd care to look HERE, I think you'll find some suitable material.

I was thinking of something more like this: http://www.page3.com/