More proof that women have more rights than men

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://abc13.com/news/court-man-who-isnt-father-of-child-still-owes-payments/2236804/
HOUSTON (KTRK) -- A Houston man is fighting a court order for tens of thousands of dollars in child support for a child DNA proves isn't his.

The system still may consider him a 'deadbeat dad' despite the scientific proof. But Texas law may not care about the science.

Gabriel Cornejo's only choice may be to pay the $65,000 in child support for a child that isn't his and he's only met one time last year.

...

He, his wife and the ex-girlfriend he broke up with 16 years ago all agreed he should get a DNA test. He did.

"The results came in," Cornejo said. "I'm not the father."

But that wasn't the end of the case.

Not even close.

Cornejo's ex-girlfriend still wants the money and so does the state of Texas.
Show of hands, male feminists - how many of you want this to happen to you?
 
The opposition lawyer is blaming him for not having dealt with the matter long ago when it happened. effectively saying: you snooze, you lose. Now, ur child or not, u have to pay child support.
 
The opposition lawyer is blaming him for not having dealt with the matter long ago when it happened. effectively saying: you snooze, you lose. Now, ur child or not, u have to pay child support.
That's a weasel argument. He had no idea what it was for, and probably didn't even notice the TWO garnishments.

If the genes don't fit you must acquit.

He should just flee the country and not pay. Starve the bitch. All men in this situation should flee and not pay. There needs to be a revolution to force women to stop this. If men take a hard core stand we will win this. What we need is the balls to fight back and force things to go right.

We can destroy the planet if we put our minds to it. We should be able to take this nonsense down.
 
Devil's advocate (as someone that handles child support administration in an office): I don't see how someone could not notice a child support deduction from their paycheck. They usually aren't small and notification is required by law for any garnishments.
 
That's a weasel argument. He had no idea what it was for, and probably didn't even notice the TWO garnishments.

It will be interesting to see the development.

Totally unjust. those who agree he has to pay are nutcases. He's been tricked.
 
It will be interesting to see the development.

Totally unjust. those who agree he has to pay are nutcases. He's been tricked.
The problem is that in some states

like California

your goose is cooked by the time the first garnishment happens. That's because if any random woman that you never even met names you as her baby's father, the State will send you a notice to challenge the claim. If it doesn't get to your mailbox you can't challenge it. They issue a judgement against you by default and you can't ever use a DNA test to get yourself out thereafter.

Lightning could literally strike any random man, and probably not just in California.
 
The guy in this case is a total dimbass never tell a girl your real name

Scotty
 
The opposition lawyer is blaming him for not having dealt with the matter long ago when it happened. effectively saying: you snooze, you lose. Now, ur child or not, u have to pay child support.

So, blame the victim and continue to victimize him, huh? :(
 
Back
Top