More Jewish Holocast Attrocities

krastner

more experienced than you
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Posts
2,950
Victims of Soviet genocide Mass murder of a type never before seen in human history was carried out in Russia by the Soviet government from 1917 until roughly 1953. That was the world's first modern holocaust, i.e. the systematic murder of millions of people by a government. The Soviet holocaust began years before the Nazis committed their holocaust [1].

After communists created the Soviet Union, they murdered or oppressed anyone who opposed them, or might oppose them in the future. The result was a 36-year campaign of bloodshed and mayhem. The people who ran the Soviet Union were felons who were not elected to power. Many of them had been wanted by the law, or had served time in jail, before they achieved their positions of authority. [Given that fact, it seems odd that anyone would consider the Soviet Union to be a valid entity. Yet American president Franklin Roosevelt did, as did various Western celebrities].

At least twenty million Russian citizens were murdered in the Soviet holocaust, and many more than that were imprisoned and/or tortured in some way. Many of the people who were murdered or oppressed were politically conservative or moderate Russians who simply opposed Soviet communism. But some of the people who were killed by the Soviets were political leftists who, for certain reasons, opposed the Soviet government, or, were seen as a political threat to the government.

Most of the murders committed during the Soviet holocaust were committed by people who were racially/ethnically Jewish [in fact, Jews, via their political activism, built the Soviet Union]. Granted, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin was not a Jew, and his predecessor Vladimir Lenin was only part-Jewish [however both were married to Jews]. But most of the top people who served in the Soviet government under both Stalin and Lenin were Jewish, and their names are well-known to many historians - for example Leon Trotsky, Lazar Kaganovich, Lev Kamenev, Genrikh Yagoda, Nikolai Yezhov [2].

The Soviet holocaust is rarely mentioned in the West today. And when it is mentioned, it isn't referred to as a holocaust. The reason for that is because public mention of that holocaust - and calling it a holocaust - would cause the Nazi-committed holocaust to be significantly overshadowed. Such overshadowing would have major political, racial and financial consequences, not just for the Jews but for other people as well.

Let's look at the types of murders that were committed by the Soviet government during the 20th century's first mass murder event:

1. Death by gunshot: millions of innocent Russian citizens were rounded up, jailed in various detention centers, and then shot in the back of the head - right where the head meets the neck. That type of 'neck shot' was a Soviet specialty, and is described Here.

2. Death by famine: in the Ukraine, the Soviet government created a famine by seizing livestock, crops, grain and other necessities from the citizens. Any citizen who resisted the governmental food or livestock mandates was usually shot. Desperate Ukrainian citizens ate anything to try to survive the famine: bugs, grass, even leather shoes. At least seven million people starved to death in the Ukrainian famine that began in 1932. The Jewish commissar L. Kaganovich oversaw that famine. There was another Soviet-produced famine in the Volga region of Russia beginning in 1921, in which up to
5,000,000 people died. Both famines were carefully planned by the Soviet government [3].

3. Death by gulag: Russian citizens were rounded up by the millions and put into Soviet forced-labor camps called gulags. Many gulag prisoners died from over-work, malnourishment or disease. Prisoners were also abused - for example, some were forced to eat human feces. Other were routinely beaten or left in freezing temperatures. A prisoner who was unable to reach quota - i.e. perform a set amount of work per day - was deprived of food or other necessities, which often led to the prisoner's death. The gulags were usually located in very remote areas of Russia, meaning that even if a prisoner managed to escape, he would probably not reach a populated area and would then die from exposure to the elements.

Unlike the victims of the later, Nazi-committed holocaust, the victims of the Soviet holocaust were mostly innocent citizens. They had usually done nothing wrong. They had merely opposed communism's aims. Or, perhaps they had instead committed the "crime" of owning a nice house, or land. Hitler's victims, on the other hand, were mostly communists, anarchists, ultra-liberals, gypsies, homosexuals or common criminals - in other words, they weren't exactly the cream of society. The distinction between the types of victims in those two holocausts is noteworthy.

Victims of Soviet genocide Interestingly, apart from the Soviet government, Jews also dominated many Eastern European communist governments [4], and as such they oversaw what might be referred to as micro-holocausts, i.e. the murder, torture and jailing of scores of other innocent citizens, most of them gentiles as well.

Some Jews might make excuses for the Soviet holocaust. They might say that the Jews in Russia were only responding to anti-Semitism when they carried it out. But that's a weak excuse. Murdering 20 million people and enslaving millions more for decades is not an appropriate response to a social feature that was caused by Jewish behavior in the first place. Other Jews might say that the Soviet holocaust was not a 'real' holocaust. But of course it was: certain people were methodically murdered over a long period of time. Certain people were selected for persecution. Actually, Hitler's holocaust - which was in many ways a response to the Soviet holocaust - could possibly be described as having been more humane than the first holocaust. After all, Hitler gave his victims many opportunities to flee Europe during the 1930s - and many did. Hitler even planned to send Jews to Madagascar, until WWII made that idea unfeasible. But the Soviets didn't give their victims a chance to flee Russia.

A sad footnote to the genocide committed in the Soviet state is that no major Soviet officials were ever legally charged with committing murder, even after the fall of the Soviet Union. Kaganovich, Stalin's right-hand man and the most important figure in the Soviet holocaust after Stalin himself, died of old age in 1991 without ever facing criminal charges. Yet Nazi 'war criminals' were executed by the allies even when they did not commit any murders, for example the publisher Julius Streicher, who was executed solely for what he printed. A similar example is German navy admiral Karl Doenitz, who was jailed for 10 years after WWII for the "crime" of commanding Germany's navy during the war.

Let the world begin to learn that there was a holocaust before the Holocaust [it's usually spelled with a capital "H" now]. The first holocaust claimed more innocents and lasted far longer than the Nazi-committed murder event [5]. The first holocaust's perpetrators were mostly Jewish and their victims were mostly gentiles who merely said "no" to a hateful Jewish idea called communism [6].

[1] the number of people killed by the Nazis in the Holocaust is nowhere near 6 million -- the actual number is more likely about 3 million, with the causes of the deaths of those people being shooting, disease and starvation in concentration camps. There is hardly any evidence to back the claim that concentration camp inmates were "gassed" by the Nazis. Empty containers which may have held cyanide-producing pellets - which were apparently found at German concentration camps by the allies after WWII - prove nothing, since such pellets were used throughout Europe long before WWII in pest-control fumigation.

[2] there are three standard Jewish answers to the charge that Jews committed genocide in the Soviet Union: a) "Stalin wasn't a Jew"; b) "Stalin was an anti-Semite" [maybe that's why he married a Jew]; and c) "you're an anti-Semite." Jewish denial of the role that Jews played in the Soviet holocaust is rather revealing of the mentality of the Jewish community in general.

[3] some eyewitness accounts of the Soviet-produced famine.
http://www.ukrweekly.com/Archive/1986/518615.shtml

[4] Jewish-dominated Eastern European communist countries included Poland, Romania, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Bulgaria.

[5] the Nazis did not attempt to end the Jewish race in Europe, since the victims of the Nazis included many types of people besides Jews. Had the Nazis wanted to focus solely on the Jews, they would have.

[6] the Jewish political activist Karl Marx is the godfather of communism. The ideology of communism was spread throughout Europe by activists who were usually Jewish, e.g. Karl Radek in Germany and Bela Kun in Hungary.
 
krastner said:

[5]Had the Nazis wanted to focus solely on the Jews, they would have.

And Heydrich's "Final Solution" was actually a discussion on how to solve a Rubik's Cube.
 
Originally posted by krastner

Unlike the victims of the later, Nazi-committed holocaust, the victims of the Soviet holocaust were mostly innocent citizens.

That has got to be one of the top 10 stupidest things I have ever read. Then again, what did I expect reading the king of crappy threads.....
 
I have tried to be nice. I really have. But Krastner you are one of the bigest fucking idiots I have ever come across. You are so full of hate it is amazing. You are able to cut and paste some facts, but you ability to reason based on those facts is nill. You clearly are a single minded moron, that has no ability to get past your hatred. What the fuck happened to you in your past that fills you with such hate? Did a Jew beat you up? Did a Jew beat you in a biz. deal? Did a Jewish girl dump you for some one with brains? Or are you part Jewish but were never accepted? There has to be some reason for your hatred. What the fuck is it? Or are you just a fucking moron with nothing better to do?
 
Re: Re: More Jewish Holocast Attrocities

catfish said:
That has got to be one of the top 10 stupidest things I have ever read. Then again, what did I expect reading the king of crappy threads.....

I think he was just warming up with his Exxon caused the Tsunami thread.
 
Re: Re: Re: More Jewish Holocast Attrocities

zipman said:
I think he was just warming up with his Exxon caused the Tsunami thread.

He is not worth the time. I bet he is LT.
 
krastner said:
[1] the number of people killed by the Nazis in the Holocaust is nowhere near 6 million -- the actual number is more likely about 3 million, with the causes of the deaths of those people being shooting, disease and starvation in concentration camps. There is hardly any evidence to back the claim that concentration camp inmates were "gassed" by the Nazis. Empty containers which may have held cyanide-producing pellets - which were apparently found at German concentration camps by the allies after WWII - prove nothing, since such pellets were used throughout Europe long before WWII in pest-control fumigation.

This is my favorite part.

It's too bad they left out the observation that the giant ovens at Auschwitz were just for baking REALLY BIG loaves of bread.
 
Re: Re: More Jewish Holocast Attrocities

Lasher said:
This is my favorite part.

It's too bad they left out the observation that the giant ovens at Auschwitz were just for baking REALLY BIG loaves of bread.

Krastner just likes sandwiches.
 
Re: Re: More Jewish Holocast Attrocities

catfish said:
That has got to be one of the top 10 stupidest things I have ever read. Then again, what did I expect reading the king of crappy threads.....

Krastner's post count is 985, why limit it to just 10?
 
bill-pix-trade said:
I have tried to be nice. I really have. But Krastner you are one of the bigest fucking idiots I have ever come across. You are so full of hate it is amazing. You are able to cut and paste some facts, but you ability to reason based on those facts is nill. You clearly are a single minded moron, that has no ability to get past your hatred. What the fuck happened to you in your past that fills you with such hate? Did a Jew beat you up? Did a Jew beat you in a biz. deal? Did a Jewish girl dump you for some one with brains? Or are you part Jewish but were never accepted? There has to be some reason for your hatred. What the fuck is it? Or are you just a fucking moron with nothing better to do?

And I'm not circumsized either I'm proud to say...

No a Jew never beat me up but the Jewish wife of my Jewish dentist who was also his assistant gave me a great blowjob while her husband worked on my teeth.

What get's me ole bill prick is that all you have to go on is the brainwashing that was put in your little head when you were a puppy (if you're still aren't ) You use the word hate like it just flows off your tongue like the canned excuses and interpretations of right wing "kristian" zelots. I'm not surprised by your arguments..I've heard them before hundreds and hundreds of times for years and years...Oh wait a minute..you didn't offer any arguments..did you?? No just excuses and spiteful venom..hey isn't that what the zionist Jews give out..?
 
The Holocaust on trial

While there was a horrific travisty perpetrated by the Nazis, even today the actual facts and truths are not clear cut. Any attenpt to question the standard line of presented "history" is loudly decreied as antisemitic and an attack on the memory of Jewish victims
This applies even now and here in Lit as evidenced by the horrified response to anyone wanting to discuss aspects of this time in history. What really is the hangup here, when there is no problem discussing genocides anywhere else.

If the evidence is so overwhelming, why could a simple case in Canada, not be proven?
Things are obviously not as we have been taught.

20th Anniversary of the Great Holocaust Trial

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/revisionist14.html

<excerpt>
In reponse Zundel put the so-called "Holocaust" itself on trial, hiring a little-known maverick lawyer from British Columbia, Douglas Christie, to argue his case before Judge Hugh Locke. Seated next to Christie was the learned revisionist historian Prof. Robert Faurisson of France, who guided Christie's withering cross-examination of a long train of "saintly 'Holocaust' survivors" offered by the "Crown."

Zundel's defense was initially regarded by the press and public as preposterous. "How can anyone deny the 'Holocaust?" was the incredulous response to the news that Zundel would vigorously defend himself and the free speech rights of all Canadians. The trial was expected to be a quick and ignominious rout of Zundel and his motley crew.

How wrong the odds-makers were! For the first time in history the holy "survivors" finally had to submit their "testimony" to scrutiny, to the rules of evidence and cross-examination, something that has never happened before or since. Seated in the press gallery, I watched as my colleagues of the fourth estate grew ever more surprised and shocked at the amazing admissions Christie and Faurisson elicited from the "eyewitnesses" to the gas chambers. TV reporters like Claud Adams and journalists from the Toronto Star and Globe and Mail produced footage and headlines that turned Canada upside down.

Canadian readers and viewers learned that there was no scientific evidence for homicidal gas chambers, that homicidal gassings (as opposed to the German use of Zyklon B as a life-saving prophylactic against the deadly typhus louse), were a rumor that the inmates heard but never actually witnessed for themselves--these were statements obtained by Mr. Christie from the prosecution's own vaunted Auschwitz eyewitnesses!

In March of 1985 Zundel was convicted by a cowardly jury that had followed the prejudicial advisories of a bent judge; but the conviction was reversed on appeal and Zundel went to trial again in 1988, eventually winning a Supreme Court decision for free speech in Canada.

The 1988 trial is more well known in revisionist circles. Zundel was famous by then and the appearance of Fred "Dr. Death" Leuchter, the designer of the US Prison system's execution apparatus, as an expert defense witness who tested purported execution "gas chambers" on-site in Auschwitz, Poland and determined they had never been used to kill anyone, created an international sensation.
 
Resistance to finding the truth

A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz
Germar Rudolf


http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n2p-3_Rudolf.html

Conclusions
As they do for all alleged crimes in the historical past, the forensic sciences hold the key to the riddles of Auschwitz. No group with the power to conduct, or else to demand, forensic research on the necessary scale seems willing to do so: on the contrary. Those in power have no stake in changing our view of Auschwitz, and consequently of the Holocaust, and forensic research is liable to do exactly that. Instead, authorities the world over persecute and prosecute those who advocate or attempt such research. This may slow us down, but it will not stop us.

When revisionist researchers achieve a sudden breakthrough through forensic research, they are countered not merely with slander and persecution, but also with academic forgery and professorial deceit, of which the Krakow forensic report is so evident an example. How desperate must they be, the keepers of the flame of the Holocaust legend, to resort to such methods? By guarding the purported graves and "gas chamber" ruins of Auschwitz from scientific inquiry, they risk the burial of their own reputations, and the ruin of the Auschwitz myth
 
With a little care and attention to detail, this could turn into an excellent "I can search Google for more bullshit "facts" than you can" thread.

I have an 'inet "friend" of some ten years standing. He is a retired professor of history. He taught at Berkeley, amongst other venerable institutions. He has published numerous papers and is internationally recognised. Given the tone of this thread I will not reveal his name, for obvious reasons, but, trust me, he exists.

One of his areas of specialty is "revisionist historians", i.e. people who attempt to rewrite history for their own ends and to suit their own purposes.

I offered the view in a recent discussion with him that anyone with access to Google and the ability to cut and paste can now become an instant "historian", particularly with regard to subjects like the Holocaust.

He told me that historic "revisionists" have existed for far longer than the internet...their ability to disseminate "revised" history enhanced by the advent of the daily newspapers and the rotary press and the advent of the ability to mechanically reproduce images. The internet has merely allowed them to increase their output in a quantitative sense, but definitely not in a qualitative sense.

Using their own tools, a search for the author of the above article Germar Rudolf produces a heap of hits...most of them from sites run by, or allied with the likes of Dr David Irving one of the most infamous Holocaust deniers.

One of the best explanations of Mr Rudolfs claims to fame can be found here: http://www.williscarto.com/rudolf.html

(Watch how the boys and girls of the revisionist camp jump in here and accuse the authors of that site of being the running pig dogs of the Zionist Illuminati, apologists for the Jewish masterminds behind the Communist regime in Russia and general all round bad bastards)

My point is: anyone with a few hours to spare, access to Google and the inability to carry out legitimate research,i.e. validating the information, the source of the information and then finding other legitimate sources for cross referencing can carry on fallacious arguments like this one for ever, all the while convincing themselves they are "winning"

With apologies to anyone who saw my similar postings in a similar thread, I'd like to post a series of links to web pages to clarify what I mean.

Notice how legitimate each one appears. Each one has "experts", "references" official sounding names and other legitimising tools:

The Earth is really flat:

http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm

The world is really run by secret societies:

http://www.illuminati-news.com/

The moon landing was faked:

http://www.apollo-hoax.me.uk/index.html

The Holocaust never happened at all:

http://www.fpp.co.uk/

And my favourite....Elvis is alive and well and living in ????

http://www.elvissightingbulletinboard.com/
 
Oh, and for whoever it was who kept demanding the names of the Holocaust victims as proof of the number of victims:

http://www.yadvashem.org/

The carefully documented names of 3 million Jewish Holocaust victims.

From a total of, by their reckoning, but not yet documented well enough to suit the revisionists 6 million in total
 
littleroundman said:
Oh, and for whoever it was who kept demanding the names of the Holocaust victims as proof of the number of victims:

http://www.yadvashem.org/

The carefully documented names of 3 million Jewish Holocaust victims.

From a total of, by their reckoning, but not yet documented well enough to suit the revisionists 6 million in total

You cannot brush off Holocaust questioning along with UFO's and fake moon landings. We have all seen the piles of starved bodies and the trains and all the other historic material that goes with it.

I dont see anyone in those areas you are castigating, denying that people died in huge numbers, because they did.

The point they question is in the intent to exterminate and the practicality of doing what is claimed. Any open minded person would expect a full investigation and analysis of such a tragedy to clarify the truth, but at every turn, there is a cone of silence, backed up by an Internatianal resistance to crack open the Pandoras Box we have all be sold, to see if it stands up to credible examination. To examine the crime scene is deemed Antisemitic . WTF, does it also mean it is antiRoma, antigay, anti insane, etc, for all the others that died there just as equally.

Anecdotal evidence was the backbone of the original story and there is tremendous pressure to retain this version of the truth against a growing body of science that doesnt fit.

Wheres the harm to mankind by finding out what really happened.
The Holocaust business has been very beneficial to Israels objectives and it is here the loss of credibility would be most damaging if the story were changed.

This is, in truth, a Zionist international war to retain a myth on which they have milked the guilt of the world in their quest for the Jewish Homeland.
 
woody54 said:
You cannot brush off Holocaust questioning along with UFO's and fake moon landings. We have all seen the piles of starved bodies and the trains and all the other historic material that goes with it.

I dont see anyone in those areas you are castigating, denying that people died in huge numbers, because they did.

The point they question is in the intent to exterminate and the practicality of doing what is claimed. Any open minded person would expect a full investigation and analysis of such a tragedy to clarify the truth, but at every turn, there is a cone of silence, backed up by an Internatianal resistance to crack open the Pandoras Box we have all be sold, to see if it stands up to credible examination. To examine the crime scene is deemed Antisemitic . WTF, does it also mean it is antiRoma, antigay, anti insane, etc, for all the others that died there just as equally.

Anecdotal evidence was the backbone of the original story and there is tremendous pressure to retain this version of the truth against a growing body of science that doesnt fit.

Wheres the harm to mankind by finding out what really happened.
The Holocaust business has been very beneficial to Israels objectives and it is here the loss of credibility would be most damaging if the story were changed.

This is, in truth, a Zionist international war to retain a myth on which they have milked the guilt of the world in their quest for the Jewish Homeland.

Your desire to dismiss the tons of evidence that has been collected which verify the intent of the camps and the practicality of their use is demonstrative of your utter prejudice and hatred against jews.

You're a sad and pathetic little man woody, and you can try and revise history all you want, but that doesn't change the facts.

Time and time again you show this board your true colors, and believe me, they are much worse than any you attribute to the jews you hate so much.
 
Re: Re: Look at me!

BigGator5 said:
This is what it all boils down to.

Speaking of boils did you ever do anything about the one atop your neck??
 
Krastner you really ought to hook up with David Irving and Robert Faurisson (sp?)

Them's your boys I can tell....
 
woody54 said:

This is, in truth, a Zionist international war to retain a myth on which they have milked the guilt of the world in their quest for the Jewish Homeland.

I noticed during the "Auschwitz memorial day" , which lasted a week Isreal basked in the numerous apologizes of the rest of the world. It seems that the only place that they didn't get much sympathy was in the Tsunami reagion. Oh and by the way all during the ethnic cleansing of the Kosova Albanians..not once did Isreal protest against what was happening there. Could be it would steal their thunder for their own sympathy
 
littleroundman said:
My point is: anyone with a few hours to spare, access to Google and the inability to carry out legitimate research,i.e. validating the information, the source of the information and then finding other legitimate sources for cross referencing can carry on fallacious arguments like this one for ever, all the while convincing themselves they are "winning"

Thanks for saying what I am not intelegent enough to say.
 
Back
Top