LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The latter is NOT offensive, in my opinion. I don't get why it would be offensive, except to Sharia law or some shit like that.this isnt offensive
yet this is
Naw, it ain't like that. The message of the picture was that certain people get mad when they can't walk around naked, but then this same bunch also gets mad when they see women in swimsuits in ads, you know, like the poutrage over Paris Hilton's Carl's Jr. ad. The point is, whichever way you change the law, you can't satisfy these people.your image suggests otherwise
it's okay to use tits and ass to sell beer... but it's a public outrage if women go topless
that's the contradiction
the former places women in the position as objects..if they didn't want to objectify women, there would be just an equal marketing campaign of using men solely for their physical attributes.. and that would be every inch as sexist
the latter says that women are also sexual objects but from a "moral" viewpoint.. that women should conceal themselves out of respect for societal values
in closing... your image isnt an ironic commentary on the alleged hypocrisy of the statements.. both statements are absolutely correct