LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Milo Yiannopoulos flames out

4est_4est_Gump said:
That was certainly not bleeding all over the forum. It was a rational and dispassionate discussion of a current event and the forces driving it.

In short, you are not being truthful. You are offering a general and blanket ascription.
Click to expand...

For some reason you think I was talking about you.

Yes, yes, I know... you never said I was talking about you. I get your defense before you even have to assert it.

If you feel I was disparaging you, that's on you not me. I can't craft my posts to ensure you won't feel slighted.
 
Repost

I've never paid him any mind and never discussed him.

...

Like many corrupted by liberalism, Milo Yiannopoulos has been ill served by the liberty he enjoys, because it seems that most of what he "pleases to do" is vile and vulgar (and, with the loss of his job at Breitbart, his book deal, and his CPAC invite, has recently cost him dearly.)

I've never been impressed with Yiannopoulos. His penchant for what is vulgar has always turned me off. As is the case with a foul-mouthed musician or comedian, if you have to resort to regular use of cursing and crude sexual references to make your point, I'm just not going to pay attention. In light of that, I've never understood the fascination of some conservatives ("so-called" in many cases, I'm afraid) with a swearing, sex-crazed, unrepentant homosexual.

Yes, Yiannopoulos has boldly taken a stand for free speech and bravely confronted the ignorant, safe space-seeking "End of Discussion" mob that dominates U.S. campuses. However, he's done so devoid of "morality and religion" and with few "civil and social manners." Thus, as Matt Walsh recently pointed out:

[Yiannopoulos] is not equipped nor qualified to be a spokesman for the conservative cause. He never was. He was always a spokesman for his own cause, his own cult, and even before his foray into pederasty-promoting, his cult never had very much to do with anything resembling conservatism.​

...
Click to expand...
Trevor Thomas





http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/02/milo_needs_moral_chains.html#ixzz4ZPc9HJAr
 
JohnnySavage said:
For some reason you think I was talking about you.

Yes, yes, I know... you never said I was talking about you. I get your defense before you even have to assert it.

If you feel I was disparaging you, that's on you not me. I can't craft my posts to ensure you won't feel slighted.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, I asked you who was engaging in this behavior because I wanted to know who they were.

You said me. I called bullshit.

Yu still are engaging in a straw man argument.
 
It will be interesting to see if Milo goes the way of Roush V or pulls out of the flat spin, Top Gun-style.
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
I'm sorry, I asked you who was engaging in this behavior because I wanted to know who they were.

You said me. I called bullshit.

Yu still are engaging in a straw man argument.
Click to expand...

Apparently it's what he does best. At least he's consistent.
 
Lancecastor said:
It will be interesting to see if Milo goes the way of Roush V or pulls out of the flat spin, Top Gun-style.
Click to expand...

While he's been in risky business of late, I dont think its mission impossible for him to recover. He probably still has a few good men in his future.
 
"In light of that, I've never understood the fascination of some conservatives ("so-called" in many cases, I'm afraid) with a swearing, sex-crazed, unrepentant homosexual."




I understand it perfectly.

1. He hates liberals. Most of his columns weren't any sort of defense of anything in particular; they were just tirades against liberals (or perceived liberals, such as black people). The one thing that ties the conservative movement together is that they hate liberals.

2. Being young, gay, and vaguely "alternative" in a movement that's typically opposed to all those things served the real purpose -- and this was a definite theme in the presidential election -- of signaling that people like that boring old Hillary Clinton and her fans were the stuffy establishment, while we're the cool kids who like to cuss and break shit.


Now the face of alt-right youth is this punchable dweeb:

http://cbsnews3.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2017/02/12/aa4542a8-3ae1-4e65-9865-436bb77dd7f8/thumbnail/620x350/b5068163ecb8572bb2346b57919dd50c/ftn-miller.jpg
 
Wrong Element said:
"In light of that, I've never understood the fascination of some conservatives ("so-called" in many cases, I'm afraid) with a swearing, sex-crazed, unrepentant homosexual."




I understand it perfectly.

1. He hates liberals. Most of his columns weren't any sort of defense of anything in particular; they were just tirades against liberals (or perceived liberals, such as black people). The one thing that ties the conservative movement together is that they hate liberals.

2. Being young, gay, and vaguely "alternative" in a movement that's typically opposed to all those things served the real purpose -- and this was a definite theme in the presidential election -- of signaling that people like that boring old Hillary Clinton and her fans were the stuffy establishment, while we're the cool kids who like to cuss and break shit.


Now the face of alt-right youth is this punchable dweeb:
Click to expand...

The "alt' right is a fatuous invention of the triggered left.
 
I suspect Milo is now popular with most Democrats, especially teachers.
 
I like Al Jazeera's take on this.

commentators have repeatedly cautioned that far-right hate speech around Muslims and minorities gets absolved in a way that nobody would dream of doing if the subject were, just by way of stark illustration, child abuse.

Well, now here's the proof. Previously supportive conservatives and publishers couldn't back away from Milo fast enough once those comments about sex with underage boys came to light.

Those who had previously insisted we should debate the hate, not shut it down, seemed to vanish into thin air. It turns out that - who knew? - there are limits to free speech, after all, and even for the far-right.
Click to expand...

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/02/milo-hypocrisy-free-speech-170222081617243.html
 
Rightguide said:
The "alt' right is a fatuous invention of the triggered left.
Click to expand...


This is false and is easily proven false. If "alt-right" was a liberal invention, then why did Hillary Clinton spend so much time simply defining it in her speech last summer? Since she, you know, was speaking to an audience that you're claiming invented the term.
 
Wrong Element said:
This is false and is easily proven false. If "alt-right" was a liberal invention, then why did Hillary Clinton spend so much time simply defining it in her speech last summer? Since she, you know, was speaking to an audience that you're claiming invented the term.
Click to expand...

Really?

Politicians tell people what they want to hear and the Liberals had been telling themselves that for some time now when it comes to Breitbart.
 
Wrong Element said:
This is false and is easily proven false. If "alt-right" was a liberal invention, then why did Hillary Clinton spend so much time simply defining it in her speech last summer?
Click to expand...


Because she came up with it to give her triggered snowflakes something to rage at......can't be a hero without a bad guy.

Wrong Element said:
Since she, you know, was speaking to an audience that you're claiming invented the term.
Click to expand...

He was wrong, they didn't invent it, the (D) elites did, but they were the first to start using/spreading/popularizing it.
 
Maidboy said:
The term "alt right" was coined by white supremacist Richard Spencer...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right

It's your politically correct euphemism, so man up and own it.
Click to expand...

That in no way, shape or form doesn't mean the Libs latched on to it the same way, almost exactly, they latched onto the TEA Party has an evil entity driven by racism and xenophobia.

If a conservative group came out branding itself as 2% Cottage Cheese Republicans, the Libs would cry, SEE! WHITE SUPREMACY! NAZIs! HITLER!!!
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
That in no way, shape or form doesn't mean the Libs latched on to it the same way, almost exactly, they latched onto the TEA Party has an evil entity driven by racism and xenophobia.

If a conservative group came out branding itself as 2% Cottage Cheese Republicans, the Libs would cry, SEE! WHITE SUPREMACY! NAZIs! HITLER!!!
Click to expand...

Well at least you acknowledge that your claim of the alt right being "a fatuous invention of the triggered left" is total bullshit. But "Cottage Cheese Republicans?" Get a grip, dude.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SkyBubble
Milo Yiannopoulos Deported
2
Replies
28
Views
887
briancamdudetenger2018
B
THROBBS
ABC Exhausting, though not Exhaustive
Replies
9
Views
10K
Sunlover102
Sunlover102
L
Republican CA Assemblyman Mike Duvall brags about cheating on his wife
Replies
7
Views
321
JABcomix
JABcomix
Back
Top