mccarthy announces impeachment enquiry against President Biden, despite lacking the votes to get it started

[butters]

and mtg & gaetz are squabbling like kids trying to take the most recognition for getting it announced... look daddy trump! look at me being all loyal and shit!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=39ea70060295419d9d99b1d9825b3fa2&ei=11

 

[ll74]

He's gone before Christmas

 

[Rightguide]

Pelosi didn't take a vote before either of the impeachment inquiries into Trump.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1701646903916782048

 

[phrodeau]

He will win stupid prizes.

 

[Lazaran]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1701646903916782048

•
Glitch McConnell’s reaction to the exact same question.

 

[HisArpy]

He doesn't need any votes to get it started, he only needs enough votes to finish it.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

He doesn't need any votes to get it started, he only needs enough votes to finish it.

Exactly. Pelosi paved the way for eliminating the need for a vote. The inquiry will provide tools that will help add to the already voluminous body of evidence regarding Joe Biden’s role in the family influence peddling business.

 

[HisArpy]

Exactly. Pelosi paved the way for eliminating the need for a vote. The inquiry will provide tools that will help add to the already voluminous body of evidence regarding Joe Biden’s role in the family influence peddling business.

What the inquiry needs is evidence that is irrefutable by even the most die hard Trump hating Democrat. That's going to be hard to do without a smoking gun and they've had more than enough time to find and destroy anything remotely resembling that.

 

[LLCox]

They need Trey Gowdy to make it the Three Stooges.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1701686360833155417

let the shitshow commence!

 

[adrina]

 

[YDB95]

Pelosi didn't take a vote before either of the impeachment inquiries into Trump.

She had the votes, both times. McCarthy doesn't.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1701711567103168580

 

[Lazaran]

What the inquiry needs is evidence that is irrefutable. That's going to be hard.

Fyp;yw



Harpy

 

[jomar]

Lol, Kevin caved

 

[Lazaran]

View attachment 2270947

•
Weaker McCarthy is weak.

*nods*

 

[icanhelp1]

Exactly. Pelosi paved the way for eliminating the need for a vote. The inquiry will provide tools that will help add to the already voluminous body of evidence regarding Joe Biden’s role in the family influence peddling business.

I bet if they review the documents and testimony from the first impeachment they would uncover additional evidence of Biden corruption.

 

[Bn2f]

I bet if they review the documents and testimony from the first impeachment they would uncover additional evidence of Biden corruption.

I wish you would hurry up and tell House republicans that everything they need is right there from the 2020 impeachment because in 2023 they seem to be struggling in finding any proof much less time to read any readily available old transcripts.

 

[spegil]

 

[ll74]

He won't be speaker by new years.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

What the inquiry needs is evidence that is irrefutable by even the most die hard Trump hating Democrat. That's going to be hard to do without a smoking gun and they've had more than enough time to find and destroy anything remotely resembling that.

More evidence the better, but don’t forget, we’ve seen recent polling that shows the evidence that’s been uncovered to date has already convinced a majority of Americans that Biden was involved in Hunters business dealings. This isn’t going to be adjudicated in an impeachment proceeding or court of law. It’s going to be judged at the ballot box. The job of the House is continuing to inform voters. Comer’s committee is having an impact on public opinion. The inquiry will help uncover more information for voters to assess.

 

[Rotadom]

Your leadership is trash.

 

[jomar]

What the inquiry needs is evidence that is irrefutable by even the most die hard Trump hating Democrat. That's going to be hard to do without a smoking gun and they've had more than enough time to find and destroy anything remotely resembling that.

How would they destroy such records?

 

[adrina]

The job of the House is continuing to inform voters.

Here I was thinking the job of the house is the business of governance. Silly me.

But then we know it's just another waiting for the email server moment. Weaponized government is the SOP for the GOP. God knows they can't write legislation worth a pinch of damn.