Maxim Magazine Nude Photo.

[Clitfucker]

To all of the Maxim magazine readers and subscribers there will be a NUDE photo. The place to look for it is on the bridge of the magazine.

The NUDE photo won't be complete until the December 2002 issue. After you get the December 2002 issue just stack every issue you have from January 2002 (at the bottom of the stack) to December 2002 (at the top of the stack) and VOILA you have yourself a NUDE photo courtesy of Maxim magazine.

 

[RawHumor]

Is that kinda like the old Star Wars cards that would make a picture if you arranged them upside down?

 

[Clitfucker]

Is that kinda like the old Star Wars cards that would make a picture if you arranged them upside down?

I guess so, but I'm not for sure.

 

[OUTSIDER]

Whats the bloody point when you can log on and down load hundreds of nude photos ?



it might have been an idea in the 50's or 60's but nudity is everywhere now so whats the point.

 

[Clitfucker]

Whats the bloody point when you can log on and down load hundreds of nude photos ?



it might have been an idea in the 50's or 60's but nudity is everywhere now so whats the point.

This is the only way that Maxim can show a NUDE photo, DUH.

 

[DannyBoyUK]

My reaction is on a par with that of OUTSIDER

Out of interest,,,,of whom will the nude photo be ?

 

[DannyBoyUK]

I suppose the June/July issues placed together may show a pussy !

Unless whoever it is in kneeling down, then we would have to get a back issue from Feb or March !

 

[Clitfucker]

My reaction is on a par with that of OUTSIDER

Out of interest,,,,of whom will the nude photo be ?

I don't know who it will be. I am only up to her knees.

 

[OUTSIDER]

This is the only way that Maxim can show a NUDE photo, DUH.

I just find the idea lame and somewhat juvenile....if you want a nude picture in a magazine go buy a copy of penthouse, the whole "Lads mags" thing has passed me by.

To many men these days seem to spend all their time trying to be boys rather than adults.

 

[DannyBoyUK]

I can't believe that I even wasted two postings commenting on the childish idea.......three postings now.

 

[Joe Adcock]

Whats the bloody point when you can log on and down load hundreds of nude photos ?



it might have been an idea in the 50's or 60's but nudity is everywhere now so whats the point.

Yes, you are missing the point. The titillation value of the photo is negligible -- it's interesting as a graphic design choice, and a minor advertising gimmick. It shares its heritage with Mad magazine's folding back cover pictures, and the puzzle cut baseball cards issued by Donruss and others....

Plus there is the minor gesture of defiance implicit in offering nudity through a magazine sold at the supermarket, and is of a piece with the hardcore shots in contemporary issues of Penthouse and the coy little pussy pics in Playboy in the evolution of socially transgressive media.

Does it make a difference? Think about the hottest Playboy Playmate of your adolescence. For me...oh, too many choices, but let's say it was someone famous, like Bebe Buell, Liv Tyler's mom. There were dozens of nude pictures of her around, but never once did I actually see her pussy. Now look at the Playmate for May 2002, Christi Shake. Along with some of the most obviously enhanced breasts in the history of the magazine, here are Christi's muscular little labia peeping out at us in a rear shot...I think this makes a difference. No matter if she wins an Academy award or the Nobel peace prize, Playboy has started us out with a peek at her quim, and I think that has to have some effect on our cultural relationship with her.

Putting together a simple nude photo on the exterior of 12 issues of a magazine seems less impressive to us now, jaded as we are by shaved and pierced snatches in pictorials about the runners-up in the Centerfold Search, and access to a million splayed orofices on the web. But imagine you are a 15-year-old kid, and you can buy this magazine at the grocery store without having to lie about your age, even if you live in Peru, Illinois. And the constructive element of the presentation, amassing these collectible magazines, offers a measure of socially redeeming value that makes it likely you won't even have to hide them from your Mother.

It gives you hope for the progressive ideal in America. It's why we fight.

 

[Weird Harold]

After you get the December 2002 issue just stack every issue you have from January 2002 (at the bottom of the stack) to December 2002 (at the top of the stack)

You just bought stock in Maxim, I take it?

 

[Clitfucker]

Re: Re: Maxim Magazine Nude Photo.

You just bought stock in Maxim, I take it?

No, you have got the wrong idea.

 

[tortoise]

I don't know who it will be. I am only up to her knees.

<guffaw>

 

[RawHumor]

I actually looked at the edge of a Maxim last night, and sure enough, there was a pair of knees on it.

Odd.

 

[OUTSIDER]

Yes, you are missing the point. The titillation value of the photo is negligible -- it's interesting as a graphic design choice, and a minor advertising gimmick. It shares its heritage with Mad magazine's folding back cover pictures, and the puzzle cut baseball cards issued by Donruss and others....

Plus there is the minor gesture of defiance implicit in offering nudity through a magazine sold at the supermarket, and is of a piece with the hardcore shots in contemporary issues of Penthouse and the coy little pussy pics in Playboy in the evolution of socially transgressive media.

Does it make a difference? Think about the hottest Playboy Playmate of your adolescence. For me...oh, too many choices, but let's say it was someone famous, like Bebe Buell, Liv Tyler's mom. There were dozens of nude pictures of her around, but never once did I actually see her pussy. Now look at the Playmate for May 2002, Christi Shake. Along with some of the most obviously enhanced breasts in the history of the magazine, here are Christi's muscular little labia peeping out at us in a rear shot...I think this makes a difference. No matter if she wins an Academy award or the Nobel peace prize, Playboy has started us out with a peek at her quim, and I think that has to have some effect on our cultural relationship with her.

Putting together a simple nude photo on the exterior of 12 issues of a magazine seems less impressive to us now, jaded as we are by shaved and pierced snatches in pictorials about the runners-up in the Centerfold Search, and access to a million splayed orofices on the web. But imagine you are a 15-year-old kid, and you can buy this magazine at the grocery store without having to lie about your age, even if you live in Peru, Illinois. And the constructive element of the presentation, amassing these collectible magazines, offers a measure of socially redeeming value that makes it likely you won't even have to hide them from your Mother.

It gives you hope for the progressive ideal in America. It's why we fight.

What a load of old clap trap and waffle, it's just a cheap add to get more readers (sic).

 

[Vilac]

What a load of old clap trap and waffle, it's just a cheap add to get more readers (sic).

Your point being?

Isn't it the editor's job to not only provide entertaining reading material, but to *SELL magazines? Heaven forbid they actually *TRY and get new readers.

That's almost unheardof.

God damn editors anyhow.
V~

 

[RawHumor]

What a load of old clap trap and waffle, it's just a cheap add to get more readers (sic).

Say what you want, at least it's an orginal idea. Did they show pictures of a nude woman and claim they were of a celebrity? Nope. It's a clever way to get people to try to collect and save every issue.

 

[Clitfucker]

I actually looked at the edge of a Maxim last night, and sure enough, there was a pair of knees on it.

Odd.

See what I'm talking about? I wasn't lying to anyone about this.

 

[OUTSIDER]

Say what you want, at least it's an orginal idea.

Hardly.

 

[RawHumor]

See what I'm talking about? I wasn't lying to anyone about this.

I have to admit, I only 40% believed you, but I figured you were bull-shitting us. I'm wondering how they'll put nipples or a bush (or lack there-of) on the magazine cover, even if it's on the edge.