Marxists are like arsonists in a very dry woods

coachdb18

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Posts
9,366
Has anyone else noticed this propensity for lighting and tossing matches into dry tinder, an assault of topically vacuous flaming, screaming the exalted rhetoric of the proletariat, only to move on to the next new flaming thread (same topic on a new Diamond match)?
 
Well, I guess that's what a union backed public school education has come to! Semen? Really... that's the best you can do! I feel like I'm wasting a good MENSA membership even playing here!
 
Well, I guess that's what a union backed public school education has come to! Semen? Really... that's the best you can do! I feel like I'm wasting a good MENSA membership even playing here!

This should have been "?", not "!", dummy.
 
Has anyone else noticed this propensity for lighting and tossing matches into dry tinder, an assault of topically vacuous flaming, screaming the exalted rhetoric of the proletariat, only to move on to the next new flaming thread (same topic on a new Diamond match)?

Could you illustrate this posts with some examples.

This thread could be titled "Litcons are like an arsonist dancing with a strawman," and the OP would be an example.
 
Could you illustrate this posts with some examples.

Obviously I could, but those without blinders already know, and those with them won't remove them because of anything I say. So I'm not going to take that bait, thanks.
 
Obviously I could, but those without blinders already know, and those with them won't remove them because of anything I say. So I'm not going to take that bait, thanks.
If you can deliver, how is it bait?
 
Obviously I could, but those without blinders already know, and those with them won't remove them because of anything I say. So I'm not going to take that bait, thanks.

No, it's not obvious. It's not even likely.

As with most Litcons, when called to back up their words, you fall short. It's easier to scatter a few buzz words and blame the audience for not getting your message.
 
No, it's not obvious. It's not even likely.

As with most Litcons, when called to back up their words, you fall short. It's easier to scatter a few buzz words and blame the audience for not getting your message.

CoachDB18 said:
...and those with them won't remove them because of anything I say

You're in group B
 
If you can deliver, how is it bait?

From ancient Greece and Rome to the current EU, as well as the US that's barely hanging by a thread.....all traced back to the gov getting to big and collapsing under it's own weight either through costly economic or social corruption/oppression.

Bad juju could be said for lack of government also. Not enough and things don't develop. But that hasn't collapsed a major power yet, it just keeps the party from getting started....it's ALWAYS an overbearing gov that ends it. So personally I think there is a fine balance...that being said however I think when the gov quits protecting people and starts micromanaging peoples lives in ways that have nothing to do with public safety and everything to do with generating money.....gone to far left.

Considering we have so many federal laws alone they can't even count them, tax code so loopy and vast no one actually understands how it works and business start up's at an all time low b/c the pile of gov fee's and permits makes start up's harder than ever, I feel we are hanging by an economic thread. One more bubble, upset or even scandal and it could very easily KILL the US economy.

We are imprisoning more people than ever, we are taxing winners to support failures more than ever, and the gov is hostile towards business's large and small more than ever, the US's gov is too big for it's britches and when they finally chase off business all together our privileged 1st world lives are going to shit the bed, mark my words.

We need to eliminate corporate welfare/bloated gov budgets and regulate the shit out of public welfare as well. I think term limits and banning of lobbying would be a great start to ending bull shit spending/corporate welfare which is a HUGE part of the problem. The 1% should not be getting additional gov. hand outs.

But then again nothing I say will change a leftist economic views of "I know the gov put us in this situation but they will fix it, just tax the rich until they are fucking destitute and their companies are bankrupt!!!!!! YEA!!! it will be a party wheeew!!! gov money fixes everything!!" :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Next time, bring your A game, or come back in your old name.

If, "please explain your position" exhausts your material, there's no reason to continue.

Did you get one of those nicely starched brown shirts when you joined the LitPolice? and a badge? Obviously not given a gun (not a permitted progressive checklist item) :(

I'm not female, so I don't have a 'maiden name', old name, or duplicate names.... You?
 
Did you get one of those nicely starched brown shirts when you joined the LitPolice? and a badge? Obviously not given a gun (not a permitted progressive checklist item) :(

I'm not female, so I don't have a 'maiden name', old name, or duplicate names.... You?

if you are so confident that you speak truthfully why are evading explaining yourself


wlecome to the GB...when you start talking shit expect to have to back it up
 
Marxists are like arsonists in a very dry woods. Has anyone else noticed this propensity for lighting and tossing matches into dry tinder, an assault of topically vacuous flaming, screaming the exalted rhetoric of the proletariat, only to move on to the next new flaming thread (same topic on a new Diamond match)?

I swear to God I've had it with tiny-minded anti-intellectual moron-bots of Internetland. They've actually taken on odor -- something electronic, sweaty and acrid. Like an overheating PC in wool.
 
From ancient Greece and Rome to the current EU, as well as the US that's barely hanging by a thread.....all traced back to the gov getting to big and collapsing under it's own weight either through costly economic or social corruption/oppression.

Bad juju could be said for lack of government also. Not enough and things don't develop. But that hasn't collapsed a major power yet, it just keeps the party from getting started....it's ALWAYS an overbearing gov that ends it. So personally I think there is a fine balance...that being said however I think when the gov quits protecting people and starts micromanaging peoples lives in ways that have nothing to do with public safety and everything to do with generating money.....gone to far left.

Considering we have so many federal laws alone they can't even count them, tax code so loopy and vast no one actually understands how it works and business start up's at an all time low b/c the pile of gov fee's and permits makes start up's harder than ever, I feel we are hanging by an economic thread. One more bubble, upset or even scandal and it could very easily KILL the US economy.

We are imprisoning more people than ever, we are taxing winners to support failures more than ever, and the gov is hostile towards business's large and small more than ever, the US's gov is too big for it's britches and when they finally chase off business all together our privileged 1st world lives are going to shit the bed, mark my words.

We need to eliminate corporate welfare/bloated gov budgets and regulate the shit out of public welfare as well. I think term limits and banning of lobbying would be a great start to ending bull shit spending/corporate welfare which is a HUGE part of the problem. The 1% should not be getting additional gov. hand outs.

But then again nothing I say will change a leftist economic views of "I know the gov put us in this situation but they will fix it, just tax the rich until they are fucking destitute and their companies are bankrupt!!!!!! YEA!!! it will be a party wheeew!!! gov money fixes everything!!" :rolleyes:

Nice and all. What does it have to do with my post?
 
Did you get one of those nicely starched brown shirts when you joined the LitPolice? and a badge? Obviously not given a gun (not a permitted progressive checklist item) :(

I'm not female, so I don't have a 'maiden name', old name, or duplicate names.... You?

Whatever you say, and whoever you used to be. I've had this user name from the beginning and never found a reason to change.

Asking a simple question is not police work. Do your feel repressed?

You said there was a "propensity", but refused to show examples. We might actually agree on something, if you could somehow put what you believe into words.

So far, the only thing you have shown is a propensity for tortured metaphors.
 
Nice and all. What does it have to do with my post?

Just backing up coaches assertion that a Marxist couldn't manage a piggy bank much less a national budget/economy, not any better than some psychotic right wing nut who want's to just turn it ALL off today.

But I was also making it clear that while I would love anarchy/skeletal gov it's just not a great idea for most and wont happen until we get called on our bills and can't pay up. Or Z day...which I often pray will happen at any moment.

However I see that this thread is nothing more than one hack's thread blown up in his face turned into a bunch of other hacks "fuck this guy" gang bang thread with little to no discussion beyond "fuck this narrow minded hater!!!" so I will leave it at that.
 
Just backing up coaches assertion that a Marxist couldn't manage a piggy bank much less a national budget/economy, not any better than some psychotic right wing nut who want's to just turn it ALL off today.

But I was also making it clear that while I would love anarchy/skeletal gov it's just not a great idea for most and wont happen until we get called on our bills and can't pay up. Or Z day...which I often pray will happen at any moment.

However I see that this thread is nothing more than one hack's thread blown up in his face turned into a bunch of other hacks "fuck this guy" gang bang thread with little to no discussion beyond "fuck this narrow minded hater!!!" so I will leave it at that.

What the fuck does "backing up an assertion" mean? Do you have some examples of the posts he could not produce?
 
Nice and all. What does it have to do with my post?

What the fuck does "backing up an assertion" mean? Do you have some examples of the posts he could not produce?

Don't quote the pothead please. Or at least if you're going to say something really clever. You do know God kills a kitten everytime someone reads his drivel right?
 
Back
Top