Mark Shmuckerberg: German Refugee Policies ‘Inspiring,’ U.S. Should ‘Follow’

M

miles

Guest
Yeah, let's follow their lead and bring in more entitled, lawbreaking thugs.

This clown is living inside a bubble.
 
Yes, yes he is...

;)

One wonders how many will be allowed into his bubble compared to how many would be dumped in flyover country.
 
Maybe he should buy a country for them. It's not like the weasel can't afford it.
 
He could put his money into camps right where they are now, but if he can get everyone else to pay to bring, house and feed them here...

;) ;)

WHY WOULDN'T HE DO THAT AND KEEP HIS WEALTH???

Isn't that what the hated, evil rich do?
 
If he devoted more time giving his billions away to people who really need it he could spend more time concentrating on keeping hate speech and racism out of Facebook.

After all, he took it from them to begin with.
 
If he devoted more time giving his billions away to people who really need it he could spend more time concentrating on keeping hate speech and racism out of Facebook.

After all, he took it from them to begin with.

People are free to do with their money what they want. If you believe certain groups of people need more money you are free to hand over your own money rather than whine someone else should do it just because they have more than you do.

That said, if Mark is serious he would open his home to some of the refugees and take them in. However, like the vast majority of people who say refugees or illegals should be let in unfettered, rarely do they back up their words with actions. They won't do it, but it should be done anyway.
 
People are free to do with their money what they want. If you believe certain groups of people need more money you are free to hand over your own money rather than whine someone else should do it just because they have more than you do.

.

:rolleyes:

Is the word sarcasm in your vocabulary?
 
:rolleyes:

Is the word sarcasm in your vocabulary?

Sarcasm, without voice inflection, doesn't come across that well in written form. That is why /sar or /sarcasm is generally used at the end of sentences to indicate such to the reader.

Or at least :rolleyes:
 
M Assburger is a DISEASED FOOL JEW who LOVES TERRORISTS

May he be ASS RAPED by his ISLAMIC LOVERS
 
Yes absolutely, let's open our borders to hundreds of thousands of people who are criminals, rapists, 3rd world savages, and terrorist cells.

Several thousand women in Germany alone have been raped by these fucking animals.
 
Last edited:
Most of our media conglomerates (Disney, Fox etc), Facebook, major corporations and a shit ton on politicians both D and R have been pushing for this since 2008. Bloomberg straight up admitted in an interview in 2010 that the media has been quietly publishing pro-immigration puff pieces in order to acclimate Americans to the idea of of a massive increase. They (the global elites) are conspiring to decrease western wages, using H1B shenanigans to decrease white collar wages, and unskilled immigrants to take from blue collar. That dead baby on the beach was horse shit, but it worked to get mostly male refugees into Germany. Not for humanitarian purpose, but for the cheap labor.
 
Most of our media conglomerates (Disney, Fox etc), Facebook, major corporations and a shit ton on politicians both D and R have been pushing for this since 2008. Bloomberg straight up admitted in an interview in 2010 that the media has been quietly publishing pro-immigration puff pieces in order to acclimate Americans to the idea of of a massive increase. They (the global elites) are conspiring to decrease western wages, using H1B shenanigans to decrease white collar wages, and unskilled immigrants to take from blue collar. That dead baby on the beach was horse shit, but it worked to get mostly male refugees into Germany. Not for humanitarian purpose, but for the cheap labor.

Unfortunately for you and Dr. Ben Carson the refugees weren't mostly male. They were and are mostly Women and children. The majority of refugees — 51.1 percent — are under age 17, including 38.5 percent who are younger than 12 years old. males aged 18-59 make up 21.8 percent.

You don't have to take my word for it, you can look at the UNHCR data yourself, in fact I encourage it. Educate yourself rather than repeat disproved BS.

As for the "Global Elites" conspiring to decrease western wages, say hello to Mike Yates, he may have a tinfoil hat for you.
 
Unfortunately for you and Dr. Ben Carson the refugees weren't mostly male. They were and are mostly Women and children. The majority of refugees — 51.1 percent — are under age 17, including 38.5 percent who are younger than 12 years old. males aged 18-59 make up 21.8 percent.

You don't have to take my word for it, you can look at the UNHCR data yourself, in fact I encourage it. Educate yourself rather than repeat disproved BS.

As for the "Global Elites" conspiring to decrease western wages, say hello to Mike Yates, he may have a tinfoil hat for you.

I don't know anything about Carson so I can't comment on him.

The number varies dependant upon what time frame you select. If you look at the 2015 migration rates into Germany, they were 70% male. I got that number from the UNHCR website approx four months ago; I screenshot it an posted on Facebook (would dig it up but I am leaving in a moment) in case it disappeared from the website.

Regarding depressing wages via immigration, google Partnership for a New American Economy.

My introduction to this group came here:
Bloomberg Deploys Hundreds of CEOs to Move Lawmakers on Immigration
The Partnership for a New American Economy uses an economic argument to sway lawmakers on immigration.

Some conservative lawmakers have changed their rhetoric on immigration recently, citing economic benefits, and the Partnership for a New American Economy says it's behind the shift.

The coalition of 500 business leaders and mayors, launched by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg (himself a former CEO) and News Corporation head Rupert Murdoch in 2010, has spent the last two years deploying its members to write pro-immigration opinion pieces, make media appearances and—perhaps most importantly—hold private meetings with lawmakers in their areas.

The coalition's chairman (and Bloomberg's chief policy officer) John Feinblatt tells Whispers that many of the Republican lawmakers who voted for the STEM Jobs Act, a pro-immigration bill, did so after they "heard from businesses that said: 'This is important to our bottom line.'"

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/wa...reds-of-ceos-to-move-lawmakers-on-immigration

Partnership for a New American Economy

The leadership, CEO of Disney and CEO of FOX sitting on the same board, pushing the same ideas:

attachment.php



And finally, why are you so foul and nasty all of the time, why can't you simply disagree and make your point? How is this fun for you? It isn't for me, which iis why I rarely post here and instead take my political discussions elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top