mojo_cat
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2003
- Posts
- 144
I want proof.
I've been told recently (in a very heated argument) that the difference between poetry (ha ha let's not even get into describing poetry) and lyrics, as in song lyrics, is staggering and saturnine, and I disagree.
I've found song lyrics to be moving, well-written and vivid, and I've found some poems to be wooden, lame and awkward. I think it's all a matter of style.
Now, my debate partner agreed that some are good and some are bad in each category, but put forth the argument that song lyrics, of necessity, don't have to reach the same standards as poetry because musical accompaniment provides much of the emotional heft of the piece.
I can see her argument, but I think fans of Tom Waits and Tori Amos would argue that sparse accompaniments (or a cappella songs, which feature only one instrument, the voice, and only a melody line) rely more heavily on lyrical might than anything else.
Thoughts, counterarguments, proof?
I've noticed that song lyrics I have submitted to Lit and to other sites in the past don't generally rank as well or have the same impression as poetry, and I think it's because without a sense of rhythm or melody they don't come across as powerfully- but I believe that is MY failing as a songwriter, NOT a proof of the weakness of the form.
I'd be interested in your opinions.
I've been told recently (in a very heated argument) that the difference between poetry (ha ha let's not even get into describing poetry) and lyrics, as in song lyrics, is staggering and saturnine, and I disagree.
I've found song lyrics to be moving, well-written and vivid, and I've found some poems to be wooden, lame and awkward. I think it's all a matter of style.
Now, my debate partner agreed that some are good and some are bad in each category, but put forth the argument that song lyrics, of necessity, don't have to reach the same standards as poetry because musical accompaniment provides much of the emotional heft of the piece.
I can see her argument, but I think fans of Tom Waits and Tori Amos would argue that sparse accompaniments (or a cappella songs, which feature only one instrument, the voice, and only a melody line) rely more heavily on lyrical might than anything else.
Thoughts, counterarguments, proof?
I've noticed that song lyrics I have submitted to Lit and to other sites in the past don't generally rank as well or have the same impression as poetry, and I think it's because without a sense of rhythm or melody they don't come across as powerfully- but I believe that is MY failing as a songwriter, NOT a proof of the weakness of the form.
I'd be interested in your opinions.