Lt. Col. Lindman

[bellisarius]

Patriot? Hardly. He did serve with distinction, perhaps he should have stayed in the combat arms.

First off, Lindman is a Harvard grad. Oddly enough, so is Ciaramella. OK, "good ole boy" school ties.

Ciaramella was booted from the White House for leaking yet Lindman thought it was OK to leak compartmentalized information to Ciaramella? That is a security breach right there. Lindman has to know that his military career is over now.

Lindman's stated motive for speaking up was a fear that if the Ukrainian's opened an investigation that congress would no longer authorize funds. (Call that a congressional quo quid pro.) Sounds legitimate on the surface BUT Ukraine got their funds without opening an investigation before Lindman came forward. So he's addressing a concern that's no longer a concern and that strips his motive of any legitimacy.

Why would he feed that information to a low level CIA analyst? He has his own chain of command to work through should he have any concerns. (This is strike two on his record. You ALWAYS work the chain of command.) Is he working for the CIA now while still in uniform? That is a legitimate question. That does happen from time to time on the operational level, but he ain't "operational."

If his "concern" became a non-concern then why? What was said in that conversation that would strike fear in the hearts of the CIA's "good ole boy" networks, could it be "Crowdstrike?"

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Character assassination is not going to work.

When all is said and done it will be shown that Trump tried ro divert Congressional ie Taxpayer funds to extort a foreign country into digging up dirt on his personal political rival--and thereby activiely working against US National Security.

Either you argue that this is fine, no big deal, or you impeach the MOFO. That's what it's going to come down to. Defend the substance or not.

Patriot? Hardly. He did serve with distinction, perhaps he should have stayed in the combat arms.

First off, Lindman is a Harvard grad. Oddly enough, so is Ciaramella. OK, "good ole boy" school ties.

Ciaramella was booted from the White House for leaking yet Lindman thought it was OK to leak compartmentalized information to Ciaramella? That is a security breach right there. Lindman has to know that his military career is over now.

Lindman's stated motive for speaking up was a fear that if the Ukrainian's opened an investigation that congress would no longer authorize funds. (Call that a congressional quo quid pro.) Sounds legitimate on the surface BUT Ukraine got their funds without opening an investigation before Lindman came forward. So he's addressing a concern that's no longer a concern and that strips his motive of any legitimacy.

Why would he feed that information to a low level CIA analyst? He has his own chain of command to work through should he have any concerns. (This is strike two on his record. You ALWAYS work the chain of command.) Is he working for the CIA now while still in uniform? That is a legitimate question. That does happen from time to time on the operational level, but he ain't "operational."

If his "concern" became a non-concern then why? What was said in that conversation that would strike fear in the hearts of the CIA's "good ole boy" networks, could it be "Crowdstrike?"

 

[Adre]

OMG, two guys went to Harvard. Something must be up!

 

[phrodeau]

Swiftboat him!

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Right on man. I don't believe the guy in uniform serving his country. I believe the fat jerk off with the most ridiculous comb-over in the world who has never served anyone but himself.

 

[Adre]

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a close friend of McCain’s, tweeted, “If there was ever any doubt that @realDonaldTrump should not be our commander in chief, this stupid statement should end all doubt.” He added: “At the heart of @realDonaldTrump statement is a lack of respect for those who have served - a disqualifying characteristic to be president.”

(You had it right back then you hypocrite.)

 

[Comshaw]

Patriot? Hardly. He did serve with distinction, perhaps he should have stayed in the combat arms.

First off, Lindman is a Harvard grad. Oddly enough, so is Ciaramella. OK, "good ole boy" school ties.

Ciaramella was booted from the White House for leaking yet Lindman thought it was OK to leak compartmentalized information to Ciaramella? That is a security breach right there. Lindman has to know that his military career is over now.

Lindman's stated motive for speaking up was a fear that if the Ukrainian's opened an investigation that congress would no longer authorize funds. (Call that a congressional quo quid pro.) Sounds legitimate on the surface BUT Ukraine got their funds without opening an investigation before Lindman came forward. So he's addressing a concern that's no longer a concern and that strips his motive of any legitimacy.

Why would he feed that information to a low level CIA analyst? He has his own chain of command to work through should he have any concerns. (This is strike two on his record. You ALWAYS work the chain of command.) Is he working for the CIA now while still in uniform? That is a legitimate question. That does happen from time to time on the operational level, but he ain't "operational."

If his "concern" became a non-concern then why? What was said in that conversation that would strike fear in the hearts of the CIA's "good ole boy" networks, could it be "Crowdstrike?"

Bullshit, you are so full of total utter bullshit:

..."I did convey certain concerns internally to National Security officials in accordance with my decades of experience and training, sense of duty, and obligation to operate within the chain of command. As an active duty military officer, the command structure is extremely important to me."...


Full pdf of his opening statement here:

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/5197-read-vindman-s-opening-stateme/451770f94b62c504f723/optimized/full.pdf#page=1


Comshaw

 

[LincolnDuncan]

The key word is service. Service to the US. What has the trump ever done to serve his country?

 

[cowslinger64]

LTC Vindman is not above reproach. His uniform is not a shield, anymore than the uniform was a shield for General Flynn, or Colonel North.

Service members who served and knew Ltc Vindman describe him as a left-wing, Obama supporter who had to be reprimanded for voicing his political views on duty.

Source: LTC R. Jim Hickman...check his twitter feed.

Yeah, check it out..

First tweet from this clown:


A message to all the liberal, race-baiting, hateful Dems & their #FakeNewsMedia propagandists,
@realDonaldTrump
is NOT a racist, or white supremacist, & neither are his supporters. We love, & want the best for every American, just like these beautiful children below. #Patriotic



https://twitter.com/Jim_Hickman13

 

[icanhelp1]

Character assassination is not going to work.

When all is said and done it will be shown that Trump tried ro divert Congressional ie Taxpayer funds to extort a foreign country into digging up dirt on his personal political rival--and thereby activiely working against US National Security.

Either you argue that this is fine, no big deal, or you impeach the MOFO. That's what it's going to come down to. Defend the substance or not.

Character assassination coming from the elites of character assassins. You don't need to look any further than Kavanaugh and Flynn. Hypocrites!

 

[Gypsytag]

Patriot? Hardly. He did serve with distinction, perhaps he should have stayed in the combat arms.

First off, Lindman is a Harvard grad. Oddly enough, so is Ciaramella. OK, "good ole boy" school ties.

Ciaramella was booted from the White House for leaking yet Lindman thought it was OK to leak compartmentalized information to Ciaramella? That is a security breach right there. Lindman has to know that his military career is over now.

Lindman's stated motive for speaking up was a fear that if the Ukrainian's opened an investigation that congress would no longer authorize funds. (Call that a congressional quo quid pro.) Sounds legitimate on the surface BUT Ukraine got their funds without opening an investigation before Lindman came forward. So he's addressing a concern that's no longer a concern and that strips his motive of any legitimacy.

Why would he feed that information to a low level CIA analyst? He has his own chain of command to work through should he have any concerns. (This is strike two on his record. You ALWAYS work the chain of command.) Is he working for the CIA now while still in uniform? That is a legitimate question. That does happen from time to time on the operational level, but he ain't "operational."

If his "concern" became a non-concern then why? What was said in that conversation that would strike fear in the hearts of the CIA's "good ole boy" networks, could it be "Crowdstrike?"

You're an unpatriotic faggot who can't get it up.

 

[Comshaw]

LTC Vindman is not above reproach. His uniform is not a shield, anymore than the uniform was a shield for General Flynn, or Colonel North.

Service members who served and knew Ltc Vindman describe him as a left-wing, Obama supporter who had to be reprimanded for voicing his political views on duty.

Source: LTC R. Jim Hickman...check his twitter feed.

Mr. Hickman is correct, the uniform isn't a shield against scrutiny, however, until proven to be otherwise (which unfounded dispersions don't) Col. Vindman's impeccable record of service is. Does it matter if he's conservative or liberal? No. He did what he thought best for the country by the rules set down for him, through his chain of command.

Please, if you can, come up with something of substance to discount his testimony rather then the inconsequential foofra you have presented.


Comshaw

 

[coati]

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a close friend of McCain’s, tweeted, “If there was ever any doubt that @realDonaldTrump should not be our commander in chief, this stupid statement should end all doubt.” He added: “At the heart of @realDonaldTrump statement is a lack of respect for those who have served - a disqualifying characteristic to be president.”

(You had it right back then you hypocrite.)

Yeah, but Lindsey started golfing with Trump since those days.

Apparently, something happened on the golf course at the second hole.

 

[Adre]

Yeah, but Lindsey started golfing with Trump since those days.

Apparently, something happened on the golf course at the second hole.

Did he fondle Trump’s putter?

 

[coati]

Did he fondle Trump’s putter?

No, more than that, it has to do with the second hole.

 

[Wrong Element]

PFC Franzia has a few thoughts on honor and patriotism.

 

[Adre]

PFC Franzia has a few thoughts on honor and patriotism.

He seems to have quite a few rules about how others ought to behave.

 

[Gypsytag]

He seems to have quite a few rules about how others ought to behave.

Hes just really old and stupid like boxlicker and rightguide.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

Holy shit! Triggered.

 

[Gypsytag]

Holy shit! Tranny!

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

*iggy*

 

[Rightguide]

Patriot? Hardly. He did serve with distinction, perhaps he should have stayed in the combat arms.

First off, Lindman is a Harvard grad. Oddly enough, so is Ciaramella. OK, "good ole boy" school ties.

Ciaramella was booted from the White House for leaking yet Lindman thought it was OK to leak compartmentalized information to Ciaramella? That is a security breach right there. Lindman has to know that his military career is over now.

Lindman's stated motive for speaking up was a fear that if the Ukrainian's opened an investigation that congress would no longer authorize funds. (Call that a congressional quo quid pro.) Sounds legitimate on the surface BUT Ukraine got their funds without opening an investigation before Lindman came forward. So he's addressing a concern that's no longer a concern and that strips his motive of any legitimacy.

Why would he feed that information to a low level CIA analyst? He has his own chain of command to work through should he have any concerns. (This is strike two on his record. You ALWAYS work the chain of command.) Is he working for the CIA now while still in uniform? That is a legitimate question. That does happen from time to time on the operational level, but he ain't "operational."

If his "concern" became a non-concern then why? What was said in that conversation that would strike fear in the hearts of the CIA's "good ole boy" networks, could it be "Crowdstrike?"

Vindman was born in Ukraine, came here when he was 3, he and Ciaramella served together on the NSC under Obama. They both had interests in Ukraine and American policy towards Ukraine. Here is an article by Paul Sperry who broke the Ciaramella story, check it out. Ciaramella wasn't just any old low level CIA analyst. Look at how he connects with others in the Coup against Trump:

https://www.realclearinvestigations...biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html

 

[cowslinger64]

Vindman was born in Ukraine, came here when he was 3, he and Ciaramella served together on the NSC under Obama. They both had interests in Ukraine and American policy towards Ukraine. Here is an article by Paul Sperry who broke the Ciaramella story, check it out. Ciaramella wasn't just any old low level CIA analyst. Look at how he connects with others in the Coup against Trump:

https://www.realclearinvestigations...biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html

Bwahaha.... "real clear politics"


You ain't got a "clear" spot in your whole tiny universe...


Hell, you won't even admit to being vette and serving in the Marines all so you can think you're fooling anyone.

 

[Gypsytag]

*iggy*

Lying tranny!

 

[Carnal_Flower]

That's right, because for Rs it's Trump > Country

Right on man. I don't believe the guy in uniform serving his country. I believe the fat jerk off with the most ridiculous comb-over in the world who has never served anyone but himself.