"losing her biological child was a possible consequence of her sexual "choice."

cloudy

Alabama Slammer
Joined
Mar 23, 2004
Posts
37,997
"losing her biological child was a possible consequence of her sexual "choice."

okay...got your attention (I so suck at titles).

Got this newsletter today, and thought y'all might be interested in it:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In Mississippi a few years ago, the courts took away a woman's 8-year-old child.

Why? In part because the child's mother was a lesbian.

Two of the judges in the majority went so far as to write and sign an additional opinion, unnecessary to the case's outcome, which stated that the mother must accept the fact that losing her biological child was a possible consequence of her sexual "choice."

One of those two judges was Leslie Southwick. And today, Southwick is dangerously close to being appointed to the Federal bench by President Bush.

Only the Senate stands in the way of his confirmation - will you take action with me?

Make sure your Senators return from their August break with a full inbox saying NO on Southwick's nomination!

America's highest courts are meant to be protectors of justice, not prejudice. Yet Southwick's record as a Mississippi judge raises serious doubts about his ability to apply the law fairly to all Americans. In this case alone, Southwick:

  • Went so far as to cite Mississippi's irrelevant and outdated sodomy laws, which have since been invalidated
  • Focused on "the practice of homosexuality" - refusing to even mention gay individuals as human beings.
  • Cited Mississippi's law prohibiting same-sex couples from adopting children - even though this was not an adoption case!

Tell your Senators to vote NO on Southwick's nomination

The American Psychiatric Association has long held that sexual orientation is not a "choice," and that lesbian and gay parents are just as successful as their heterosexual counterparts.

Yet Judge Southwick disregarded widely accepted science in favor of his personal bias. This man MUST NOT be given the responsibility to protect the basic rights of gay and lesbian Americans.

Help protect GLBT civil rights by writing your Senators today.

If approved to the Court of Appeals, Southwick's appointment would be for life. That's why I'm asking you to take action today - and when you're done, please forward this message on to everyone you know.

Thank you.

Warmly,

Joe Solmonese
President
 
Last edited:
Stella_Omega said:
i was just coming by with the intent of posting the same letter :rose:

great minds, and all that.

and, yeah, I get GLBT newsletters. ;)
 
We've got Durbin & Obama, so I'm pretty sure they're already behind this. If the story is true, it's very sad and I hope the judge gets appropriate Karma. :rose:
 
S-Des said:
We've got Durbin & Obama, so I'm pretty sure they're already behind this. If the story is true, it's very sad and I hope the judge gets appropriate Karma. :rose:

If the story is true?

:confused:
 
S-Des said:
We've got Durbin & Obama, so I'm pretty sure they're already behind this. If the story is true, it's very sad and I hope the judge gets appropriate Karma. :rose:

I don't understand why you wouldn't think it was true, Des. Stella and I both received newsletters about the same issue from two different organizations - mine was from the Human Rights Campaign, and hers was from Moveon. (See Stella's earlier post in this thread)
 
WHy oes the south keep prepetrating it's own fucked up stereotypes? Seriously. why don't they TRY to not be basackwards hicks? Love of god help me out here.
 
Here's the actual decision

http://www.andrewhyman.com/confirmthem/CustodyCase.pdf

Judge Southwick did not write any opinion in this case, but he did join in a concurring opinion written be another judge. That concurring opinion states that it is written in response to a dissent written by yet another judge. Read it and decide for yourself. Keep in mind that regardless of a judge's personal views, a judge is charged with applying the law of a state. It is up to the legislature of that state to change its laws.

The Human Rights Committee letter mentions Judge Southwick's testimony before the Judiciary Committee. It would be interesting to read that testimony to see how he handled questions about this decision and his views on GLBT issues generally.
 
People like to be comfortable, goddess. They like the world to be orderly and predictable.

Even if it means other people get hurt, they hold on to what they know.

Change is a scary thing. Especially when a person's power and ego may be affected by it. It's why people like this judge hate it so and work hard to prevent it. They believe that as others are raised, they'll be lowered.

Not true, but that's what people believe.
 
galaxygoddess said:
WHy oes the south keep prepetrating it's own fucked up stereotypes? Seriously. why don't they TRY to not be basackwards hicks? Love of god help me out here.
Not all of the south is 'basackwards hicks'! I do agree the judge was in the wrong but not all of us share that opinion so on behalf of all of us from down there please dont dump us all in one pot. A few bad apples don't ruin the crop.

<gets off soapbox>
 
Chantilyvamp said:
Not all of the south is 'basackwards hicks'! I do agree the judge was in the wrong but not all of us share that opinion so on behalf of all of us from down there please dont dump us all in one pot. A few bad apples don't ruin the crop.

<gets off soapbox>

I may be wrong, but I think GG is from the south Chatilly, honey... she;s probably just as cross as you that the whole South is tarred with the same brush due to some idiots perpetrating common stereotypes.
x
V
 
Alabama born, bred, raised and I'll probably die here :p

I by no means think all southerners are "hicks", it's just all the mainstream media likes to get ahold of people like this who continue making the rest of us look bad -.-;;

I love hearing from people I just met online "do you have all your teeth, or do you own a gun?" WHAT? *facedesk

When I saw "mississippi" as the state, all I could do was groan and say "stop making us look bad you asshats :( "
 
S-Des said:
We've got Durbin & Obama, so I'm pretty sure they're already behind this. If the story is true, it's very sad and I hope the judge gets appropriate Karma. :rose:
In a democracy, Karma is by the will of the people. Send letters to your congressmen folks!

Yes, Des, the story is true.
 
Sent.

Though between this, and the other 4 letters I have sent this year, I wonder if my senator is beginning to recognize me. And if so is that a good thing?
 
I feel that you people are overlooking a key item here. I am to send my Senator a letter. This begs the question: "Can my Senator read?" From my Senator's record in Congress, I doubt it.
 
Okay, not to be lazy, but I have no intention of reading the entire custody cse just to find out.

Will anyone grant me freedom of laziness and give me an overview of the other "part' the judges decided on?

Q_C
 
Back
Top