jomar
chillin
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Posts
- 27,643
Every military brass interviewed is of one voice saying LA doesn’t rise even close to a situation that warrants the military being sent in. It’s an authoritarian show of power and intimidation, not really to protect anything.If you read into the article what Trump was referring to was the National Guard being mobilized under title 10 to actual engage protestors. Under the 'POSSE COMATATUS' certain declarations have to be made by the president of the United States, one being enacting the 'insurrection act' another invoking 'Martial Law'. In 2020 he refused both.
The active duty status for national Guardsmen today is strictly defensive, for the protection of federal property and federal law enforcement. THEY ARE NOT CLOSING with PROTESTERS OR RIOTERS. LAPD, the sheriffs department and CHIPS are handling protesters along with some federal law enforcement. Difference today is that federal law enforcement are there in force, being on the scene allow US attorneys to play a larger role in that federal charges in federal courts will give prosecutions some teeth.
I believe the Marines are not bound by the 'Posse Comitatus act'.
Lessons were learned from 2020 riots. Having active duty soldiers on site is a wise move.
Absolutely on that because actual insurrection.Should have happened J/6.
Wiser in the sense he has no guardrails so can make unnecessary, but authoritarian moves to make statements.Politicians grow wiser over time. IMHO
You mean “abide” by actively defying SCOTUS and not getting Garcia back to the US when directed to do so, or not releasing billions of funds properly allocated by congress? Things like that?What he says off the cuff and what he does are two different situations. It is very obvious and Trump makes it very obvious that he will abide by court decisions and work the system.
These court judges, some of them trump appointees, are following the rule of law when trump overreaches. They are just doing their jobs and for you to say they should be punished for being wrong, which really means they should be punished because they ruled against what trump wants, is a very trumpian notion regarding intimidation and chilling effects on those who don’t blindly go along.He will appeal to congress to put district court judges back in line and appeal his cases in succession to the higher courts. In many cases district court judges are wrong but once a decision even if wrong it interferes with article II authority. District court judges that are overruled by higher courts should pay a price for being wrong.
Yes, just because can though doesn’t mean he should, especially without communicating with governors.He campaigned on it and it was very popular, probably won him the the election.
Upholding the law and is well within his authority.
How did I twist your post? What were those two different thoughts?.....................................................................
Wrong, you're delusional. He campaigned on enforcing immigration law and mass deportations.
You twisted my post to mean something other than what I actually posted.
I never wrote he campaigned on using the military. Jomar wrote two different thoughts.
You mean gross overreaction.Upholding immigration laws was part his campaign strategy. In this case he used the military to protect federal property and federal employees doing their job.
One is a campaign promise and the other is a reaction to the situation on the ground.
I cut and pasted search results and that got caught up. But maybe it shows how long he’s been ignoring the constitution when he can get away with it.You love playing word games. You post an article from 2020 which has zero relevance to the topic at hand. 2020 is not 2025.