Logic VS Name calling

Are not at all liberals.

That's because the typical response to logic by those who can't refute it is name calling.

Most folks aren't willing to admit they are wrong when proven so.



HisArpy? Moderate.
Bigsly? Radically liberal....liberal extremist.
Conager.....moderately so.
Ican....moderately so.
SpearChucker....liberal.
BB...not so much.
Me.....also a moderate liberal.




On this we agree.

STFU Dick!
 
Are not at all liberals.

That's because the typical response to logic by those who can't refute it is name calling.

Most folks aren't willing to admit they are wrong when proven so.



HisArpy? Ass
Bigsly? Radically liberal....liberal extremist.
Conager.....moderately so.
Ican....moderately so.
SpearChucker....liberal.
BB...not so much.
Me.....also a moderate liberal.




On this we agree.

Fixed your post.
 
Logic vs namecalling is a false dichotomy. One can be logical and factual... and a raging asshole who speads ad hominem like confetti at the same time.

Way worse is fake logic. Fallacies, ascription, strawmen and confirmation biased cherry picking delivered with the smug superiority of someone who thinks they're making a sharp point but in reality does anything but.
 
Back
Top