Litiquette IV

Which of the following is the most likely reason you post in a thread

  • Thread title

    Votes: 36 14.5%
  • Thread topic

    Votes: 141 56.9%
  • Who recently posted

    Votes: 22 8.9%
  • What was recently posted

    Votes: 44 17.7%
  • Who the OP is

    Votes: 5 2.0%

  • Total voters
    248
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's my girl! Fuck yes!

I'd would've liked to have had the opportunity to eat him alive. Peel him outta those pants and... :devil:

...give him a good scrubbing?

I actually prefer chaps. As in cowboys wearing chaps. As in Samuel Pack Elliott.
 
...give him a good scrubbing?

I actually prefer chaps. As in cowboys wearing chaps. As in Samuel Pack Elliott.

Maybe a tongue bath. I want to taste every show. :eek:

You get me started on cowboys and we're gonna be here a while ;)

I could watch the PBR guys all. day. long.
 
Maybe a tongue bath. I want to taste every show. :eek:

You get me started on cowboys and we're gonna be here a while ;)

I could watch the PBR guys all. day. long.

Oh man, you got it bad.

I think that we are probably in good company where the cowboys are concerned. ;)
 
Was David Lee Roth gay? Hell no! He wore assless chaps like a pro!

This is a visual I did not need.

And all chaps are assless, as well as crotchless. Why not call them crotchless chaps? I prefer them with a well worn pair of jeans underneath. And on a cowboy.
 
This is a visual I did not need.

And all chaps are assless, as well as crotchless. Why not call them crotchless chaps? I prefer them with a well worn pair of jeans underneath. And on a cowboy.

so you're saying you would like me more if I had some chaps? hmmmm ;)
 
Oh, I haven't even begun.

I recently fell hard in a thread. I took self pity and self righteousness to a whole 'nother level.

Without fail, there were a few beautiful, love-filled, supportive, compassionate, amazing women that swooped in, picked me up off the ground, dusted me off, and set me back straight real quick. One of them especially stands out. I will always remember her from this forum.

Watch out, Pmann. I almost touched you with my feelings stick. Wait, why are you jumping around? It's not gonna burn you! Are you're worried about it melting your gooey center? ;)

Oh my god. I just sprouted a vagina. A big, weepy one.

http://allthingsvagina.aspennaturopathi.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Crying-Vagina.png?5c8b7c
 
Warms up the stones, looks like we'll be in a circle soon sharing our feelings.

What's the difference for you between being in touch with your feelings vs being emotional. I've always viewed emotion as a good thing, reveals passion and desire. Without it, life seems to be a cold fish approach. But contrasted, too much emotion makes life pretty difficult to wade through.

Would being too far one way or the other be enough for you to end a relationship?
 
I know it's early to derail a thread but I really wanna talk more about men in leather pants. They make me feel... Emotions.
 
Warms up the stones, looks like we'll be in a circle soon sharing our feelings.

What's the difference for you between being in touch with your feelings vs being emotional. I've always viewed emotion as a good thing, reveals passion and desire. Without it, life seems to be a cold fish approach. But contrasted, too much emotion makes life pretty difficult to wade through.

Would being too far one way or the other be enough for you to end a relationship?
I tend to be turned off by overly emotional people. Men, in particular. It's exhausting for me to deal with an overabundance of feelings.

And I suppose there's an element of being attracted to a man who keeps a strong upper lip and all of that. I agree that being too far the other way isn't good either - I don't like emotionless cyborgs. But I would be more turned off by a man who is ruled by his emotions. That is probably true for my female friendships, as well.
 
After my dad passed away, the dam burst, and I've found myself overly emotional, and more ruled by them. Plus, with recent personal events, it's been a challenge. But I'm in a better place today, thanks to my friends, and I hope that I find that balance between hard candy coating, and gooey candy center :D
 
Oh good grief, feelings, yeah everyone has them, some exercise self control others are emotional faucets. Not all of us are going to be stoics or Agony Aunts, we're mostly guarded IMHO.
 
Being emotional, to me, means feeling emotions deeply, having a complex inner world, and being sensitive. Learning how to be in touch with your feelings means sitting with your emotions, both the good and the bad, and just allowing them to be. It has been a process and has come with maturity. Learning how to express my feelings, or even having the choice not to, instead of just reacting to them has been a lot of work. And I still mess that up pretty often.

I can either see this as a blessing or a curse, and others have that choice about me, too. Because the truth of the matter is that I have always and will always lead my life based on my emotions. It's just the way I am and I am totally accepting of that. This doesn't mean that I live only for me and my feelings. It's actually just the opposite. I live and make decisions mostly based on how others will feel.

Being emotional is an amazing experience. Whatever you're feeling, you're there in the intensity of that moment. It's wonderful, even in the emotions most would deem unpleasant... still a blessing.

It would take much more than emotionality, or lack thereof, for me to end a relationship. People are complex. We are a mixture of many parts created into a whole.

My SO is very much the strong and silent type, a man of very few words, and even less expression of emotion. Just because he doesn't express his feelings doesn't mean he doesn't have them. It's a part of him that can only be seen when you are willing to look deep, and into the totality of him. He is one of the most loving, gentle, and caring people I've ever known. If you expect him to be emotional and wear his heart on his sleeve, well, you're just out of luck. If you are willing to accept that and just love him anyway, you could find yourself being one of the most lucky people in the world.
 
Hrm. A relationship is an emotional thing; rarely is it smooth sailing. In my mind, at the end of the day, if you can't get in bed with the other person, can't put your arm around them, and vice versa, then the relationship is on the rocks.

Still waters run deep. Just because you don't see someone's emotions on the surface, doesn't mean they don't have them. If you are that shallow that you can't abide someone who doesn't display enough emotion, then the relationship shouldn't have ever started. Likewise for someone who is a fount of emotions.

Some days, there's not a cloud in the sky, on others a storm rages. Do you move just because of one or the other? I don't think so.
 
Warms up the stones, looks like we'll be in a circle soon sharing our feelings.

What's the difference for you between being in touch with your feelings vs being emotional. I've always viewed emotion as a good thing, reveals passion and desire. Without it, life seems to be a cold fish approach. But contrasted, too much emotion makes life pretty difficult to wade through.

Would being too far one way or the other be enough for you to end a relationship?

Being emotional, to me, means acting out of emotion rather than logic. I'm not saying you can't be logical and have emotions. I'm saying, in my opinion, you can't be acting emotional and logical at the same time.

Too much emotion means you're batshit crazy.
 
Too much emotion means you're batshit crazy.

Thank you! I finally have a diagnosis! Next time someone tells me I'm too sensitive. I'm gonna look right at them, do the eye squint, and say "No! I'm batshit crazy!!!" Then, I'm gonna snarl. Or growl. Or grunt. Something to make it look authentic.
 
Thank you! I finally have a diagnosis! Next time someone tells me I'm too sensitive. I'm gonna look right at them, do the eye squint, and say "No! I'm batshit crazy!!!" Then, I'm gonna snarl. Or growl. Or grunt. Something to make it look authentic.

No. Just look them in the eye, introduce yourself as Abby Normal and stare them down. Then turn around and kick Pman in the nuts again because he probably did something to deserve it.;)
 
Thank you! I finally have a diagnosis! Next time someone tells me I'm too sensitive. I'm gonna look right at them, do the eye squint, and say "No! I'm batshit crazy!!!" Then, I'm gonna snarl. Or growl. Or grunt. Something to make it look authentic.

If you say it in a gruff, gravelly voice, while wearing a cape and cowl, it will come off much more believable
 
No. Just look them in the eye, introduce yourself as Abby Normal and stare them down. Then turn around and kick Pman in the nuts again because he probably did something to deserve it.;)

Lol! Another day, another bid to beat up on Pmann. It's an entertaining thought, but he's alright by me. That's great advice on the Abby Normal stare and introduction. I'll have to work on that!

And, Pmann... being "overly" emotional does not make someone batshit crazy. Just the same as being logical versus emotional doesn't mean someone doesn't have emotions.

Being batshit crazy makes someone batshit crazy. It has nothing to do with being ruled by either logic or emotion. Some of the most brilliant, logical minds in history could be people deemed batshit crazy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top