LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Litiquette IV

Which of the following is the most likely reason you post in a thread

  • Thread title

    Votes: 36 14.5%

  • Thread topic

    Votes: 141 56.9%

  • Who recently posted

    Votes: 22 8.9%

  • What was recently posted

    Votes: 44 17.7%

  • Who the OP is

    Votes: 5 2.0%
  • Total voters
    248
Status
Not open for further replies.
My perception of this question may be a bit skewed, but...

No. It is from the depths of my pain that my eyes and heart awakened to pleasure. It is in those times that I learned to appreciate the dark and light, not being able to experience one without the other.

The struggles that I have been through have urged me on and given me the strength to seek a state of inner peace and contentment. The greatest gift in all of that is in the knowing that this is something I can work at and strive for, for the rest of my life. I am utterly committed. It is absolutely attainable. The pain will come. It is inevitable. And thankfully, so will the pleasure because of the pain.

For me, there is no greater pleasure than that of a peaceful soul, a wholeness, a state of joy, love, and gratitude, complete and total acceptance. Without those times when I could only see the glass half empty, I wouldn't have had the tenacity to learn that the reward was also seeing that it was half full. And even more so, just being grateful for the glass.

I don't want the middle ground. I want to feel it all, the bad and the good. I wouldn't trade the pleasure not to feel the pain.

It is best, the way that it is... pain and pleasure, good and bad, dark and light, all polar opposites. They are truly meant to be.

"Life appears random on the surface, but at a deeper level, it is completely organized" - Deepak Chopra
 
No...

And Dark Simian, you realize you have to be appointed by Papa C, don't you? You don't just ask a question here. It's like the Illuminati, basically.
 
Lord Pmann said:
No...

And Dark Simian, you realize you have to be appointed by Papa C, don't you? You don't just ask a question here. It's like the Illuminati, basically.
Click to expand...

That's what I was thinking....you and Papa walking around in long robes, flogging each other with barbed wire.....
 
ok, my question is this (sort of): Men have been accused of being able to separate their emotions from sex (we'll fuck anything, anywhere). But for women, in general, sex is also an emotional experience. So my question, to the ladies, is, if you could separate the emotional component of sex from the physical, would you? Would you trade endless orgasms for that emotional connection? I'm just curious....
 
DarkSimian said:
ok, my question is this (sort of): Men have been accused of being able to separate their emotions from sex (we'll fuck anything, anywhere). But for women, in general, sex is also an emotional experience. So my question, to the ladies, is, if you could separate the emotional component of sex from the physical, would you? Would you trade endless orgasms for that emotional connection? I'm just curious....
Click to expand...

This seems like a clever way to find a girl in this thread to fuck. Well played, Darkness.

It's like asking, "Which of you ladies loses your inhibitions when you drink?"

:D
 
DarkSimian said:
ok, my question is this (sort of): Men have been accused of being able to separate their emotions from sex (we'll fuck anything, anywhere). But for women, in general, sex is also an emotional experience. So my question, to the ladies, is, if you could separate the emotional component of sex from the physical, would you? Would you trade endless orgasms for that emotional connection? I'm just curious....
Click to expand...

Some time ago (quite a long time ago actually) I had a few ONS, some of those I still remember with fondness, others have merged into one because of the uneventfulness of the events. But I never felt an emotional connection to the guys/men except "me likes, me wants" or "why not, I haven't had any for a while and he seems fun" and afterwards it was "it was yummy, maybe we'll end up in bed again sometime, would be nice" or "Mweh".

Now in a longer relation I do want to feel an emotional connection. Because then the sex changes to making-love. And making-love is much more fulfilling than sex. Which doesn't mean sex is less, it is just different.

*edits to add* scientific.
 
Last edited:
DarkSimian said:
my interest is purely scientific...;)
Click to expand...

Yes- I'm very sure your interest IS purely scientific- But, you're no scientist.
Regardless, I would not choose to forego the emotional connection of sex for a purely physical attraction. Now, having said that, I'm sure most- or at least many women- have at times had sex without the emotional involvement (for whatever reason at the time- ONS's esp) and it doesn't compare. At those times, it becomes more like masturbation than sex with a partner. Once it's over- It IS over. With a partner, it doesn't end when it's simply over.

Your statement of trading endless O's? A bit confusing- those of us who are multi are usually not multi when the emotional involvement is eliminated.

Now, you may write your scientific report- unless, of course, someone else chimes in contradicting me.
 
dutchrain said:
Some time ago (quite a long time ago actually) I had a few ONS, some of those I still remember with fondness, others have merged into one because of the uneventfulness of the events. But I never felt an emotional connection to the guys/men except "me likes, me wants" or "why not, I haven't had any for a while and he seems fun" and afterwards it was "it was yummy, maybe we'll end up in bed again sometime, would be nice" or "Mweh".

Now in a longer relation I do want to feel an emotional connection. Because then the sex changes to making-love. And making-love is much more fulfilling than sex. Which doesn't mean sex is less, it is just different.

*edits to add* scientific.
Click to expand...

Much akin to where the male brain resides, I think.
 
Ubiquitious_too said:
Yes- I'm very sure your interest IS purely scientific- But, you're no scientist.
Regardless, I would not choose to forego the emotional connection of sex for a purely physical attraction. Now, having said that, I'm sure most- or at least many women- have at times had sex without the emotional involvement (for whatever reason at the time- ONS's esp) and it doesn't compare. At those times, it becomes more like masturbation than sex with a partner. Once it's over- It IS over. With a partner, it doesn't end when it's simply over.

Your statement of trading endless O's? A bit confusing- those of us who are multi are usually not multi when the emotional involvement is eliminated.

Now, you may write your scientific report- unless, of course, someone else chimes in contradicting me.
Click to expand...

how do you know I'm NOT a scientist? I did go to college for ten years (although it was clown college :rolleyes:)
 
So, as the most angelic member of this forum, I have to admit I have no fucking clue what an ONS is. I'm just so innocent, I suppose. *adjusts halo*
 
Lord Pmann said:
Maybe it will be just a yes or no question like this one. But somehow, All4Love made it count!
Click to expand...

Hahaha!

It does NOT count unless there is a Celine Dion or anal fisting gif attached to the post!

This is Litiquette IV! I think he knew to start an I.V. for a reason. ;)
 
Sorry I didn't know about ONSs. As I said, I'm an angel and I've never been part of such debauchery. I'm vanilla and sex with a partner really isn't my thing.
 
ChainedUp said:
Middle of the night musings...... in the category of glass half full/empty, would the presence of something good be better than the absence of something bad. Would you trade the guarantee of one over the other. If you knew you would never feel pain ever again, would you give up feeling the heights of pleasure? Or vice versa?
Click to expand...

No. I wouldn't choose easy if it meant forever was uneventful. Then again, I like a challenge.

DarkSimian said:
ok, my question is this (sort of): Men have been accused of being able to separate their emotions from sex (we'll fuck anything, anywhere). But for women, in general, sex is also an emotional experience. So my question, to the ladies, is, if you could separate the emotional component of sex from the physical, would you? Would you trade endless orgasms for that emotional connection? I'm just curious....
Click to expand...

For me, the difference isn't "if" there are emotions involved, but "when". Back in my single and carefree days, I could certainly have sex with someone without an emotional attachment. However, for that to happen it had to be a one night stand or something close to it. (No, it didn't happen often.) What I couldn't/can't do is date someone for a while and then have emotionless sex. If after several dates the connection isn't there, sex isn't going to happen. If the connection is there, sex will deepen that connection for me.

Men are rumored to be able to have sex with a woman they've dated long enough to know it isn't going anywhere. The problem with that, for women like me, is that sex at that point is happening because I thought we were moving forward.

Just my two cents. The reality is that all women are different, as are men, and each have their own sex/emotion equation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

korra12
Wake me up
Replies
2
Views
137
The_Quiet_Man
The_Quiet_Man
M
The feeling before we orgasm
Replies
7
Views
288
Mrtenant
Mrtenant
U
In Praise of Older Women...or Keeping an Open Mind
Replies
3
Views
196
Skihard90
S
Susurration
  • Sticky
FAO/FYI: All Playgrounders with UK Friends Here - Why UK Users May Soon Become Scarce
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
~Elizabeth~
~Elizabeth~
C
Your Favourite Female Musical Artist
3 4 5
Replies
123
Views
2K
latecomer91364
latecomer91364
Back
Top