KillerMuffin
Seraphically Disinclined
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2000
- Posts
- 25,603
All right, round 2!
Since we figured everyone posting at once was a bad idea, let's try 3 this week. The appointed three are Judo, Mickey, and Steamy Chik since I got the feeling that the others weren't interested in going first. The rest of us will post a writing in 2 Mondays. No rush. Alex will be joining us as a critique artist, since he'll be very busy and may not get a chance to write. Otherwise, he can post a writing sample in two weeks like Me, Bluetrain, and cym will. For this round, we'll use the same objective picture. We'll see how that works out.
Timeline:
Next Monday: All writing samples from Judo, Mickey, and Steamy Chick should be posted, close of business, PST.
Second Monday: Second group, KM, cym, and bluetrain will have the opportunity to start writing. Critiquing of first group ends with first posting by anyone of second group.
Third Monday: All writing samples from group 2 should be posted.
Fourth Monday: All critiquing should end. We do that sit back and figure out how to improve the group thing.
The Rules, as it were:
Please try to keep your post to one word processor page in length. We don't have a tremendous lot of room here and it's about the writing itself, not the story.
Please try to remember that you're supposed to be constructive, not destructive, in your comments. The goal is to help improve the writing, not to be better than anyone else.
If you post a writing sample, you should participate in the discussion of others to help this bad boy work.
Please put an introduction on what kind of help you might be looking for at the top of your writing sample. like this:
Introduction about what we are about to read. A brief description of where we are in the story and what the story is in a sentence or two.
Then, follow with the prose to fill the rest of the page. It doesn't have to be a complete idea, story or thought. But hopefully it does fulfill what you intended.
When it comes to discussion, please put the name of the author whose sample you are discussing at the head of your discussions/critiques for clarity. You may put several in one post, just make sure it's clear what you're discussing.
Some helpful hints on the criticism portion of the postings:
The picture:
by Tal Shpantzer http://geocities.com/hollywood/academy/4134/
Since we figured everyone posting at once was a bad idea, let's try 3 this week. The appointed three are Judo, Mickey, and Steamy Chik since I got the feeling that the others weren't interested in going first. The rest of us will post a writing in 2 Mondays. No rush. Alex will be joining us as a critique artist, since he'll be very busy and may not get a chance to write. Otherwise, he can post a writing sample in two weeks like Me, Bluetrain, and cym will. For this round, we'll use the same objective picture. We'll see how that works out.
Timeline:
Next Monday: All writing samples from Judo, Mickey, and Steamy Chick should be posted, close of business, PST.
Second Monday: Second group, KM, cym, and bluetrain will have the opportunity to start writing. Critiquing of first group ends with first posting by anyone of second group.
Third Monday: All writing samples from group 2 should be posted.
Fourth Monday: All critiquing should end. We do that sit back and figure out how to improve the group thing.
The Rules, as it were:
Please try to keep your post to one word processor page in length. We don't have a tremendous lot of room here and it's about the writing itself, not the story.
Please try to remember that you're supposed to be constructive, not destructive, in your comments. The goal is to help improve the writing, not to be better than anyone else.
If you post a writing sample, you should participate in the discussion of others to help this bad boy work.
Please put an introduction on what kind of help you might be looking for at the top of your writing sample. like this:
Introduction about what we are about to read. A brief description of where we are in the story and what the story is in a sentence or two.
Then, follow with the prose to fill the rest of the page. It doesn't have to be a complete idea, story or thought. But hopefully it does fulfill what you intended.
When it comes to discussion, please put the name of the author whose sample you are discussing at the head of your discussions/critiques for clarity. You may put several in one post, just make sure it's clear what you're discussing.
Some helpful hints on the criticism portion of the postings:
Judo
After you post, the other writers in the group will respond with feedback on what works and what doesn't for them. Either way, responses should be constructive criticism. An idea the writer can build from to improve.
I like to think of this as a "safe space." Which means no judgemental, if offends me, egotistical commentary should be tolerated. Just help us poor writers get better.
Bluetrain
well, whenever we as a class analyze a story, i have my students use questioning that can only lead to formative, constructive answers or discovery.
questions come in three categories:
literal: questions that can be answered yes or no (example: "do you like this character?" or, "do I set up the conflict at all?"
interpretive: questions that can be debated and can be supported by the text at hand (examples: "how can I make this plot more cohesive?" or, "IN what ways can this dialogue sound more real?"
and finally, evaluative: questions whose answers go beyond the text to the critic's and writer's experiences. examples: "do YOU think this story is appropriate for the intended audience?" or, "would YOU ever have a conversation like these characters are having?"
obviously, we focus on interpretive and evaluative questioning, as they lead to better and more developed responses. the answers are only as good as the questions.....
The picture:
by Tal Shpantzer http://geocities.com/hollywood/academy/4134/