Literotica And Its Stories.

Clitfucker

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 13, 2002
Posts
904
I know that I am going to piss a lot of people off here, but I just don't like how the stories are listed in the various catagories.

IMO, the stories should have tags on them, but instead they just have a little summary under the title of the story.


Some examples are: (FF, first time)
(MF, first time)
(F, mast)
(M, mast)


Do any of you wish that the stories had tags on them instead of a little summary?
 
Aren't they already subdivided into categories similar to the tags that you want?
 
You're from asstr or an offshoot.

There's a search stories page. Just type in whatever words you want to see occur in what you read.

I hate those codes. I think they're not only irritating as hell, there are too many of them, more than 10 apply to any given story, and I don't want to clog up a good document with gibberish.
 
Mischka said:
Aren't they already subdivided into categories similar to the tags that you want?


Yes, but tags would be more specific than a little summary.
 
KillerMuffin said:
You're from asstr or an offshoot.

There's a search stories page. Just type in whatever words you want to see occur in what you read.

I hate those codes. I think they're not only irritating as hell, there are too many of them, more than 10 apply to any given story, and I don't want to clog up a good document with gibberish.


I see that you don't know a whole lot about the codes. Care for me to educate you?
 
Clitfucker said:
I see that you don't know a whole lot about the codes. Care for me to educate you?
See, you could have just told us about the codes instead of sounding so condescending.

And to further answer your question, I prefer the summary. Not every (MFM) is the same. I'd prefer a synopsis before opening the link.
 
I have a suggestion. Once they move stories to the category from "New" the category should be organized chronologically. Then you could browse a particular genre for stories you might have missed. The way it is now, once a story has left the "new" area it's hard to find them. My 2 cents.
 
No. I've read a few lengthy treatises about codes. I doubt you could explain any better than Uther has.
 
Story Codes.

Mischka said:
See, you could have just told us about the codes instead of sounding so condescending.

And to further answer your question, I prefer the summary. Not every (MFM) is the same. I'd prefer a synopsis before opening the link.


Story Codes are:


(b)=boy, age 0-12.
(m)=teenage male, age 13-20.
(M)=adult male, age 21-whatever.
(g)=girl, age 0-12.
(f)=teenage female, age 13-20.
(F)=adult female, age 21-whatever.


That's just for the novices.
 
Re: Story Codes.

Clitfucker said:
Story Codes are:

(b)=boy, age 0-12.
(m)=teenage male, age 13-20.
(M)=adult male, age 21-whatever.
(g)=girl, age 0-12.
(f)=teenage female, age 13-20.
(F)=adult female, age 21-whatever.

Lit doesn't allow stories with minors (under 18), so you don't have to worry about ages and capitolization of your M's and F's.
 
Re: Story Codes.

Clitfucker said:
Story Codes are:

(b)=boy, age 0-12.
(m)=teenage male, age 13-20.
(M)=adult male, age 21-whatever.
(g)=girl, age 0-12.
(f)=teenage female, age 13-20.
(F)=adult female, age 21-whatever.


That's just for the novices.
Apparently clitfucker doesn't think there's anything much worth reading outside pedophilia stories, none of which we have here.

Get lost, you sick fuck.
 
Re: Re: Story Codes.

cymbidia said:
Apparently clitfucker doesn't think there's anything much worth reading outside pedophilia stories, none of which we have here.

Get lost, you sick fuck.

I love it when you talk dirty like that!


(yep...I'm following you today, I'll stop soon I promise)
 
Go ahead. See if you can beat uther's lyrical iambic pentameter. I'd like every other line to be an alliterative, non-rhyming spondee, please.

Let's try this the hard way.

I don't like something.
You like something.

My dislike of what you like does not equate to ignorance. It merely equates to a greater facility with a search engine.
 
Re: Re: Story Codes.

RawHumor said:


Lit doesn't allow stories with minors (under 18), so you don't have to worry about ages and capitolization of your M's and F's.

I've seen quite a few stories with underagers.
 
Re: Re: Re: Story Codes.

RastaPope said:


I've seen quite a few stories with underagers.

and they're all full of gaylords and vaginaterians, yes?
 
Re: Re: Story Codes.

cymbidia said:
Apparently clitfucker doesn't think there's anything much worth reading outside pedophilia stories, none of which we have here.

Get lost, you sick fuck.


How dare you come to a conclusion about me. I am in no means a pedophile. I was just listing some story codes and what they meant.
 
Back
Top