Linda Jean's Stuff

Needlenose

Virgin
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Posts
27
If there is a better writer of porn today, here on Literotica, I doubt I'll ever find him or her. Linda Jean's stuff causes me to spurt sperm every time I read it, and I read her stuff over and over again. Not bad for a 68 year old dirty old man, right?:devil:
 
Save it, Linda. As incredible as it may seem to you, you're not the first one to think of shilling for yourself. We've all heard this one before.

"Spurt sperm" indeed.


---dr.M.
 
MG,

You're right. I am a travelin' man!

But I won't be catchin' that lonely southbound till tomorrow afternoon at O'Hare.


---dr.M.

P.S. I actually did go and check out Linda Jean's stuff before I was nasty to her. I would guess what makes Needlenose spurt his sperm is having multiple characters speak like robots in the same monolithic paragraph.
 
dr_mabeuse said:
P.S. I actually did go and check out Linda Jean's stuff before I was nasty to her. I would guess what makes Needlenose spurt his sperm is having multiple characters speak like robots in the same monolithic paragraph.

Maybe she could contribute a few verses for "BH"
MG
 
I think Linda Jean's stuff is hot. Why don't people here have a look and form their opinions based on that, rather than 'shil' accusations.

Best,

J.
 
I did check it out, and I don't think it's hot. But that's not the point.

It's the underhanded way of trying to promote oneself by setting up another ID at Lit and then praising yourself as if you were an objective reader. It's dishonest, it's insulting, and it's demeaning.

If Linda Jean wanted more people to read her stuff, she could have easily asked for feedback and put her ass and her skill on the line just like the rest of us do. Or she could have just come out and said that she thinks her stuff is just terrific and that she's very pleased with herself and let it go at that.

But when you see someone you've never heard of posting a recommendation to the board, and you see that this is their first and only post it's hard not to be suspicious.

Maybe Needlenose really is a sperm-spurting 68 year-old who was just so overcome with artistic rapture that he had to share his esthetic appreciation with the rest of us, or else he's a shill.

I have a special distaste for being played for a fool, and so I suspect it's the latter, and I resent it.


---dr.M.
 
Hi dr m,

I too dislike shenanigans, esp. around self promo.

You said,



It's the underhanded way of trying to promote oneself by setting up another ID at Lit and then praising yourself as if you were an objective reader. It's dishonest, it's insulting, and it's demeaning.

If Linda Jean wanted more people to read her stuff, she could have easily asked for feedback and put her ass and her skill on the line just like the rest of us do. Or she could have just come out and said that she thinks her stuff is just terrific and that she's very pleased with herself and let it go at that.

But when you see someone you've never heard of posting a recommendation to the board, and you see that this is their first and only post it's hard not to be suspicious.

Maybe Needlenose really is a sperm-spurting 68 year-old who was just so overcome with artistic rapture that he had to share his esthetic appreciation with the rest of us, or else he's a shill.

I have a special distaste for being played for a fool, and so I suspect it's the latter, and I resent it.


Your whole posting is a house of cards, based as you say, on 'suspicion'. From suspicion you go to 'distaste for being played'; 'resentment' etc. It's like going from 'The stranger looked at me intently' to 'The CIA has targeted me for termination-- and maybe my whole family.' Yet there is not an ounce of proof.

I did correspond briefly with her and she doesn't seem like the type. Further some of her stories have done quite well in ratings.
They are among the raunchiest around and while lacking in certain editing have a definite 'punch' and 'verite' .'

The internet does not benefit by rumor and speculation, esp. presented as seeming-fact. Without any 'I could be wrong, but'. I have myself been victim of excoriation based on a single word-- of someone else.

Best regards,

J.
 
Re: Nice word!

MathGirl said:
"Verite." Wow, you don't often see that applied to smut.
MG

Too right I always thought they made radio ariels and electrical components of it, OH sorry that's Ferite, sorry.
 
LindaJean

I looked at one of LJ's pieces and thought it was badly in need of some editing. My stuff isn't much good either, so who am I to criticize. Anyone whose profile says, "Love gang bangs and glory holes" can't be all bad, though. What's a "glory hole?" I hope it isn't what I think it is.

Promotion like that leaves a story wide open to criticism, but I won't go into it. I'm afraid that might lead to scrutiny of the stuff I write, and I wouldn't care to have it inspected. I already know how bad it is, thank you, but I aspire to meciocracy.

I agree with Dr M. about the self promotion via an assumed persona. At least DurtGurl isn't sneaky about tooting her own ..... horn. She's just obnoxious.
MG

Ps. Dear Pops, We understand. Your just having one of your "days" when your grounding in reality is a bit more tenuous than usual.
 
Last edited:
Assumption is the mother of all fuckups.

I quite agree with Pure. You oughtn't just assume someone is something. The categorical imperative is a good thing to keep in mind. You don't like it when people automatically assume bad things about you, why would you think that it's okay for you to assume bad things about others?

The last time I made an assumption in these parts, I ended up eating crow.
 
closedthighs_sara said:
I'm very fond of openthighs_sarah's work. If I can find a way to post a link to her stuff, I will do that.

Dear C.T.Sara,
You wouldn't also be known as "Needlenose," would you? Having that as your first post is just a touch suspicious.
MG
 
Last edited:
MG,

You may have wondered if there's a link between a 'glory hole' and the algebraic entity known as a ring. I don't know of such a link.

The 'glory hole' is a hole 2 -- 5 ins in diameter, at a little less than waist height, in the thin wall between two booths, e.g., in a rest room or in an establishment with individual 'peep shows.'

I leave it to one of your mathematical sophistication to calculate the combinations and permutations that may be involved... and let us know.



:rose:
 
Last edited:
Glory hole

Pure said:
The 'glory hole' is a hole 2-5 ins in diameter, at a little less than waist height, in the thin wall between two booths.

I leave it to one of your mathematical sophistication to calculate the combinations and permutations that may be involved... and let us know.

Hmmm........
a. Waist high for me is about knee high for most people, so that doesn't help much.
b. 2.5" in diameter? Sounds like it could be designed for routing of electrical wiring, although a suitable nonconducting grommet would be required. Then again, it may just be a pilot hole for a four inch plumbing waste pipe.
c. Between booths? Oh, now it's in a restaurant, huh? Darn, that's hard to envision.
d. Well, whatever Linda Whosname is doing in a restaurant like that sounds like it would be very uncomfortable and not conducive to fine dining.
e. I'd advise her to be very careful what she stuck through that thing, because someone in the next booth might smack it with a spoon.
MG

Ps. It has also occurred to me that she meant to write "Gory Hole." In that case, I would need to totally rethink the combinations and permutations. In either case, I can't imagine why anyone would want to write about it.
 
// MG: Then again, it may just be a pilot hole for a four inch plumbing waste pipe. //

Flattery will get you everywhere. That analogy has not before been applied to the tubular items under discussion.

:rose:
 
//a. Waist high for me is about knee high for most people, so that doesn't help much.//

Just as one sometimes sees lower drinking fountains for the disabled, I'm sure there are low-rise glory holes for the altitudinally challenged.

Occasionally they are used by the rest of us. Are you into big toes?

:rose:
 
I don't know who the thread starter is, but I have read some of LJ's stories. I won't comment on them here though, as I don't think this is the appropriate forum for it.

Maybe this thread would have gone over better in the Story Feedback forum.
 
Well, since the stories were brought up, how about this
verite' issue? the stories have a gritty 'real' quality, with lots of sleaze, hot fluids, slimy cum, dripping orifices, etc. as if the authoress knew whereof she spoke....
 
I agree with the idea of praising onself while in disguise is a low and childish behaviour.

Me, mature as I am, always praise myself openly, without hiding under any disguise.

My stories are great. Read them and 5 'em, peeps!:D

Svenskaflicka
"Modesty is a cartoon figure!"
 
Hmmm

Pure said:

, with lots of sleaze, hot fluids, slimy cum, dripping orifices, etc. as if the authoress knew whereof she spoke....

Hmmm!! Wow Pure now you have my attention.

Hey MG could be an oversized orifice for a one and a half inch waste pie, rather than a pilot for a four inch ditto, well actually they call it 100mm in Europe not 4", I say they because I'm from the UK not fucking Europe.

pops............:D
 
Back
Top