Liberals....Trannies?

A communist bigot who hates individual freedom and the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness in favor of collective equity, lectuing others about "real patriotic Americans" :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Get absolutely fucked with a cactus you Marxist dipshit.
Mister Shaffer. I believe you may have violated your parole by even posting on this forum? "Criminal Trespass" (or colloquially known as "breaking and entering") I believe was what you were charged with.

If you have been paying attention AT ALL, you would realize that using the military to occupy American cities, turning the military against civilians, rounding up innocent people and throwing them in jail and deporting them, using the courts to persecute political opponents, trying to abolish the free press in favor of only the most loyal propagandists (among other things) is exactly how those Marxist governments, that you despise so much, typically operate. And right now, it is how our own government is operating.

Surely even YOU can see that, Chad Michael. Mister convicted felon, who has incidently been banned from this forum eleven times so far. (Only busybody has more.)
 
Is that what you call cheering Kirks murder and calling for people to "resist" the FASCIST NAZI GUARD OCCUPATION OF DEMOCRATS DEMOCRACY!!?? NOT encouraging political violence??
Nope. Refusing to pretend Kirk was anything other than the dangerous right wing demagogue he was is not "cheering his murder", and why on Earth wouldn't we call for people to resist fascists and Nazis?
 
There’s a better than zero chance that the shooter saw military garbed individuals patrolling the streets of D.C. and flashed back to Afghanistan with the military garbed Taliban patrolling the streets - and then…

👹

We. Told. Then. So.

🌷
 
Is that what you call cheering Kirks murder and calling for people to "resist" the FASCIST NAZI GUARD OCCUPATION OF DEMOCRATS DEMOCRACY!!?? NOT encouraging political violence??

🙄

Captain “FAFO” BotBoi says what???

🤔

Charlie Kirk FAAFO, and now Trump has FAAFO at the expense of those NG members who should NEVER have been deployed in D.C. to begin with.

See also: Hamas, Russia, and all the common MAGAts who are going broke, losing their health insurance, and losing their farms and businesses,

FAFO indeed…

😳

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
...of which YOU, Mr. Harpy screen name #42 are not...

There isn't a big enough roll eyes to cover this klown's bullshit.

Honestly dudly, give it a rest already. You're wrong, you've always been wrong, and you're going to continue being wrong. To keep perpetuating all that wrong headedness is just fucking idiotic.

I have ONE Lit account. Period. Just because you're mental and obsessed because people don't agree with your stupidity doesn't make me the cause of your problem. It just makes you mental and obsessed and stupid.
 
Nope. Refusing to pretend Kirk was anything other than the dangerous right wing demagogue he was is not "cheering his murder", and why on Earth wouldn't we call for people to resist fascists and Nazis?

First you have to prove that the person being named is IN FACT a fascist and Nazi.

Something you have yet to do outside of your opinion. Thus, you are advocating for violence, or supporting it tacitly, based on your opinion rather than facts.

This does not speak highly of your mental acuity.
 
You have ONE lit account. Of course you do. Sure.

Funny thing, I bet Chadrone also insists he has NEVER had any lit accounts before his current one. I bet Oryginalny will insist the same, with a straight face.

Nobody believes them, and nobody believes you. You have at least twenty current lit accounts, Mr. O'Keffie (I am assuming that is your real name? Maybe I AM wrong about that one.) And at least ten others that, for whatever reason, you no longer use.
 
If you have been paying attention AT ALL, you would realize that using the military to occupy American cities, turning the military against civilians, rounding up innocent people and throwing them in jail and deporting them, using the courts to persecute political opponents, trying to abolish the free press in favor of only the most loyal propagandists (among other things) is exactly how those Marxist governments, that you despise so much, typically operate. And right now, it is how our own government is operating.

No it's not.

Using the military to defend American cities is what it's there for, military hasn't turned against civilians. ILLEGALS aren't innocent...they're supposed to be deported you fucking moron.

You didn't have any problem using the courts to persecute Trump and like 50 other right wing figures and politicians....you called it PROGRESS!!! Because lefty marxist do lefty Marxist things, and you're just mad DEMOCRACY is giving you a taste of your own medicine.
Surely even YOU can see that, Chad Michael. Mister convicted felon,

You just make random shit up because your argument is piss poor and you know it. I've never even gotten a moving violation much less hit with a felony.
 
Charlie Kirk FAAFO, and now Trump has FAAFO at the expense of those NG members

Open support for leftist politial violence/terrorism. ^^

Thanks for proving my point about what a bunch of psychopaths you are. It's not Trumps fault Democrats can't act right.

who should NEVER have been deployed in D.C. to begin with.

You're right it should have been the 82nd and they should have been running HVT raids 24/7 on all jihadi and antifa linked suspects (democrats).
 
Open support for leftist politial violence/terrorism. ^^

Thanks for proving my point about what a bunch of psychopaths you are. It's not Trumps fault Democrats can't act right.



You're right it should have been the 82nd and they should have been running HVT raids 24/7 on all jihadi and antifa linked suspects (democrats).
Do ya mean HVT raids in the halls of congress, like Omar and Tlaib. :D
 
You have ONE lit account. Of course you do. Sure.

Funny thing, I bet Chadrone also insists he has NEVER had any lit accounts before his current one. I bet Oryginalny will insist the same, with a straight face.

Nobody believes them, and nobody believes you. You have at least twenty current lit accounts, Mr. O'Keffie (I am assuming that is your real name? Maybe I AM wrong about that one.) And at least ten others that, for whatever reason, you no longer use.

I have ONE Lit account. I've NEVER been banned on this website.

IDGAF what other people do/say about their accounts; I have ONE Lit account.

You're a douche canoe suffering from a mental breakdown for believing otherwise.
 

National Guard Members Shot Near White House​

So your President brought the National Guard in as security theatre to walk around low crime tourist spots in Washington D.C., claiming it would reduce crime . . .

How's that working out for you, little piggies?
 
So your President brought the National Guard in as security theatre to walk around low crime tourist spots in Washington D.C., claiming it would reduce crime . . .

How's that working out for you, little piggies?

It has reduced crime. Even Mayor Bowser has said that crime has been reduced and she has praised Trump for making it happen.

Soldiers put themselves in harm's way for a shit paycheck earned under shit conditions. It's what they do and they do it willingly when they sign their papers. Blaming them, or blaming Trump for having them do what they signed up to do, shows you support the murderer's actions.

And since when is picking up trash because the city is so peaceful a sufficient reason to justify murder? Or the mere fact that they're there in DC, regardless of whether you think they should be or not, a good enough reason to just walk up and try to murder 2 of them?
 
Hel_Books said:
So your President brought the National Guard in as security theatre to walk around low crime tourist spots in Washington D.C., claiming it would reduce crime . . .

How's that working out for you, little piggies?

It has reduced crime. Even Mayor Bowser has said that crime has been reduced and she has praised Trump for making it happen.

Soldiers put themselves in harm's way for a shit paycheck earned under shit conditions. It's what they do and they do it willingly when they sign their papers. Blaming them, or blaming Trump for having them do what they signed up to do, shows you support the murderer's actions.

And since when is picking up trash because the city is so peaceful a sufficient reason to justify murder? Or the mere fact that they're there in DC, regardless of whether you think they should be or not, a good enough reason to just walk up and try to murder 2 of them?
Possibly it has reduced crime, though the uptick in shootings of National Guard members might bely that claim.

In any case, as you remind us, soldiers do put themselves in harm's way to defend the country. By fighting in battles against enemy troops. But they are not law enforcement officials and historically in your country, from the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 to Kent State University the use of military for law enforcement is perilous.

Perhaps instead of sending an occupying army to Washington, DC (where crime had already been decreasing), your President could restore the funding he cut from the city's law enforcement?

The only person you have to blame for these shootings (other than the actual shooter, of course) is your President.
 
Possibly it has reduced crime, though the uptick in shootings of National Guard members might bely that claim.

It's not arguable, it HAS reduced crime.


In any case, as you remind us, soldiers do put themselves in harm's way to defend the country. By fighting in battles against enemy troops. But they are not law enforcement officials and historically in your country, from the San Francisco earthquake of 1906 to Kent State University the use of military for law enforcement is perilous.

It's a lawful use of the guard. That you don't like it doesn't make it anything other than a lawful use of the guard.

In the end, you're trying to justify the attempted murder based on a political narrative and TDS. That's just so fucking stupid even you have to see it - you just don't care. Because Trump.


Perhaps instead of sending an occupying army to Washington, DC (where crime had already been decreasing), your President could restore the funding he cut from the city's law enforcement?

That crime was decreasing is a flat out lie.
It's also not an "occupying army."
And of course, had there not been any crime, the guard wouldn't have been needed to restore order.
The lack of which is directly attributable to liberal/Democrat social policies.

You see where this is going?

The only person you have to blame for these shootings (other than the actual shooter, of course) is your President.

Right. Blame the victims for making you hurt them. That always works to show you're in the right. :rolleyes:
 
It's a lawful use of the guard. That you don't like it doesn't make it anything other than a lawful use of the guard.
That is incorrect. In any case, is it a sensible thing to do? Soldiers are more suited to repelling invaders or, say, helping flood victims. Law enforcement is better (and less expensively) done by police.
 
Back
Top