Leftists Feign Sympathy For Autistic Babies They’d Happily Abort

SkyBubble

Virgin
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Posts
1,758
https://thefederalist.com/2025/09/2...athy-for-autistic-babies-theyd-happily-abort/

hen President Donald Trump announced Tylenol can cause autism, leftists suddenly gained compassion for the disabled. This is strange, because usually they advocate killing them.

Trump said acetaminophen, the primary active ingredient found in Tylenol, used during pregnancy is linked to autism in a press conference on Sept. 22. He repeatedly urged mothers not to take it unless absolutely necessary.


The left responded by defending autism, arguing the disability does not need to be cured — since autistic people have value. This is strange, considering they support assisted suicide and aborting disabled people when inconvenient.

Although autism is a disability that can’t be detected in the womb, leftists advocate abortion for similar disabilities, such as Down syndrome. But after Trump’s announcement, leftists are pretending to have compassion for the disabled.
 
DEI is neither diverse, equitable, nor inclusive.

Show your work. Cus all I've heard since it showed up was how terrible it was for straight white males and other people getting in. They forget somehow that there are enough straight while male VETS that its not like they don't benefit but lets face it, you guys are a hate group.
 
Downs' Syndrome is not similar to autism. There is no pretend sympathy for the disabled, we actually fight for them not against them. We're not the fucking Right.

You fight for them? What a bunch of bullshit that is!!! You might fight to ABORT them but you do not fight for them.

https://lozierinstitute.org/new-stu...es-down-syndrome-community-by-thirty-percent/

...using information gathered from all member registries, from 2008 to 2012, there were 4,288 live births of children with (Down's Syndrome), 231 natural fetal deaths, and 5,215 terminations. DS live births as a percentage of total diagnosed pregnancies was 44%. Fifty-three percent of all pregnancies were aborted following prenatal diagnosis
 
You fight for them? What a bunch of bullshit that is!!! You might fight to ABORT them but you do not fight for them.

https://lozierinstitute.org/new-stu...es-down-syndrome-community-by-thirty-percent/

Abortion is always a choice. One I have mixed feelings about at that point but if you aren't in a position to provide proper care for that child it is probably the correct term. Once they are here we absolutely fight for resources for special needs children and people. Unlike the Right where they are literally the first on the chopping block. As always you care about the unborn because its REALLY about shackling women not about protecting children. IT took me a while to really figure out that even those of you who want to claim otherwise you won't pledge to spend resources. So it really doesn't matter. Youre as bad or worse than the hardcore.
 
Maybe it's your point, but your point is worthless and irrelevant.

How do your values support care givers and young families who don’t have the resources to provide 24 hour care for the children born with disabilities?

I understand your conservative values of “be lucky” but the only actual support society offers to anyone in need - (not just from the same faith) comes from the left. You know, the people who think society should be helpful to those who aren’t born and stay lucky throughout their lives?

You don’t even believe people who can’t afford it should have access to health care. Am I wrong?


Are you encouraging people to have families they cannot provide for while offering zero assistance? ✅
 
Not all autism is created equally. :)


Ooh! You might be smarter than RFK Jr. He thinks that there is an increasing epidemic of severe cases of autism when reality shows that the numbers of severe cases have been stable while many more cases of less severe autism are being identified.

One more simple test for you: How many cases of autism do you believe evidence shows are caused by Tylenol?
 
Ooh! You might be smarter than RFK Jr. He thinks that there is an increasing epidemic of severe cases of autism when reality shows that the numbers of severe cases have been stable while many more cases of less severe autism are being identified.

One more simple test for you: How many cases of autism do you believe evidence shows are caused by Tylenol?
Any kind of "more autism" is bad, or am I misunderstanding your point?

I have no idea what causes autism. I do have an autistic grandson, so I am familiar with all that entails, from schooling to meds to family dynamics. Any type of generated interest that may lead to medical advances or research funding to explain the rise is good by me.

Now, a test for you. What gives you the right to politicise a medical condition that you obviously have no knowledge about? :)
 
Any kind of "more autism" is bad, or am I misunderstanding your point?

I have no idea what causes autism. I do have an autistic grandson, so I am familiar with all that entails, from schooling to meds to family dynamics. Any type of generated interest that may lead to medical advances or research funding to explain the rise is good by me.

Now, a test for you. What gives you the right to politicise a medical condition that you obviously have no knowledge about? :)
Communists consider themselves morally superior in all respects. It's that superiority that gives them the rationale they need to kill people and destroy property.
 
the OP is just a baiter and not worth time trying to debate. The iggy button is our friend.
 
Any kind of "more autism" is bad, or am I misunderstanding your point?

I have no idea what causes autism. I do have an autistic grandson, so I am familiar with all that entails, from schooling to meds to family dynamics. Any type of generated interest that may lead to medical advances or research funding to explain the rise is good by me.

Now, a test for you. What gives you the right to politicise a medical condition that you obviously have no knowledge about? :)

I’m not sure why you think I don’t know anything about autism. 🤔

Yeah, you are missing my point. My point is that RFK Jr points to the larger numbers of cases of diagnosed “autism” and considers they are all severe.

How narrow minded of you to have autism in your family and not be supportive of wider availability of services for families who can’t afford them.

As for the politics: Do you agree with @SkyBubble ‘s politics statements that “leftists” care less about kids with autism than conservatives?
 
Back
Top