Left Says Animals Suffer From Systemic Racism

[Rightguide]

Woke Biologists Claim Now Even Wild Animals Are Suffering From the Effects of Systemic Racism​

BY ROBERT SPENCER 11:17 AM ON FEBRUARY 12, 2023

One of the most diabolically clever notions the Left has ever devised in order to advance its Marxist agenda has been “systemic racism.” Systemic racism is everywhere and nowhere, requires no evidence of actual discrimination in order to make its case, and will result, if followed to its logical conclusion, in the implementation of an unlimited number of wealth confiscation and redistribution schemes. It’s so useful that “experts” keep finding it in more and more places, and absurdity is no bar for how low they will go. Their audience, after all, is Leftists, who are already accustomed to swallowing absurd claims on an industrial scale. And so the latest claim, that even wild animals are suffering from the effects of this all-pervasive malady, was just another day for the Left’s propaganda mill.

The UK’s Daily Mail reported Saturday that “scientists” — that is, the infallible high priests of the Left’s secular religion, never to be questioned or regarded with the slightest degree of skepticism — “claim that there are fewer wild animals in neighborhoods where mostly people of color live – and their absence is affecting residents’ mental health.” Violence among racial minorities? It was because there were no squirrels, Your Honor.

It seems that “a research study that looked into the genetic diversity of wildlife in neighborhoods across the United States found government rules that previously mandated separated neighborhoods based on race, is still having lingering after-effects on where animals choose to live decades on.” And inevitably, “the study suggests that areas where mostly white people live have a greater diversity when it come to animals living in the area.”

More here: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...-from-the-effects-of-systemic-racism-n1669962

 

[ll74]

Do they have someone at pjmedia who just searches all day long for studies that have no bearing on anyone but focus on culture war issues? It sure does seem like it. I think you should apply for that position....or BB maybe.

Which conclusion of the study did you disagree with?

 

[oggbashan]

RightGuide is suffering from systemmic brain meltdown - again

 

[occupatus]

always attacks on posters and sources

never responding ever to issues presented

why?

cause there cant be responses to such absurd notions

 

[oggbashan]

Because the sources are biased bullshit. That's why.

 

[occupatus]

Because the sources are biased bullshit. That's why.

University of Manitoba biologist Colin Garroway and Chloé Schmidt from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research conducted the wildlife study and found that systemic racism has had lasting effects on the structure of cities.


are biased?

your assertion is based on what?

 

[ll74]

always attacks on posters and sources

never responding ever to issues presented

why?

cause there cant be responses to such absurd notions

Because the source is a shit opinion piece, which the poster agrees with.

 

[occupatus]

Because the source is a shit opinion piece, which the poster agrees with.

University of Manitoba biologist Colin Garroway and Chloé Schmidt from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research conducted the wildlife study and found that systemic racism has had lasting effects on the structure of cities.
are biased?
your assertion is based on what?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

It seems that “a research study that looked into the genetic diversity of wildlife in neighborhoods across the United States found government rules that previously mandated separated neighborhoods based on race, is still having lingering after-effects on where animals choose to live decades on.” And inevitably, “the study suggests that areas where mostly white people live have a greater diversity when it come to animals living in the area.”

Well you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand the correlation.

Think about it for a bit. I do understand thinking for you is hard,but do try.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

University of Manitoba biologist Colin Garroway and Chloé Schmidt from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research conducted the wildlife study and found that systemic racism has had lasting effects on the structure of cities.

Another Lit idiot can't see who this would all fall together. Well since he has no CRT education, well not even general education....

 

[ll74]

University of Manitoba biologist Colin Garroway and Chloé Schmidt from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research conducted the wildlife study and found that systemic racism has had lasting effects on the structure of cities.
are biased?
your assertion is based on what?

The study has a specific premise, which is explained in the paper.

Pj media ignores that premise and instead uses it as ammunition in their culture war. The study itself does not impact you or me in any way.....and instead is used to understand how urban planning and historical patterns have impacted wildlife.

 

[oggbashan]

University of Manitoba biologist Colin Garroway and Chloé Schmidt from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research conducted the wildlife study and found that systemic racism has had lasting effects on the structure of cities.
are biased?
your assertion is based on what?

Because effect doies not equal cause. That is an obvious failure in logic - A dog has four legs; a cat has four legs. Therefore a dog is a cat.

Systemic racism is bullshit. If anything it is related to land use, not skin colour. In Australia the opposite would be seen because native areas are sparsely popoluated. Try looking at Native American reservations instead of black conurbations.

 

[occupatus]

but that didnt stop the study

being published

 

[occupatus]

Because effect doies not equal cause. That is an obvious failure in logic - A dog has four legs; a cat has four legs. Therefore a dog is a cat.

Systemic racism is bullshit. If anything it is related to land use, not skin colour. In Australia the opposite would be seen because native areas are sparsely popoluated. Try looking at Native American reservations instead of black conurbations.

a man is a man and a woman is a woman

but this is now in dispute

 

[ll74]

but that didnt stop the study

being published

The study collected and reported on the hypothesis. Why wouldn't it be published?

 

[Rightguide]

RightGuide is suffering from systemmic brain meltdown - again

So, you have no sense of humor or comment regarding the article or it's leftwing idiocy, got it.

 

[Rightguide]

Because the sources are biased bullshit. That's why.

So the 6-page research paper submitted by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences linked in the original article is not a recognized source? I can agree the writers are full of crap in their assumptions but the National Academy Of Sciences is a well know and up until now respected institution. your problem is you don't read.

 

[ll74]

So the 6-page research paper submitted by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences linked in the original article is not a recognized source? I can agree the writers are full of crap in their assumptions but the National Academy Of Sciences is a well know and up until now respected institution. your problem is you don't read.

The source is pjmedia, whose opinion piece references a scientific study.

 

[schism666]

systemic racism was founded by marx? wtf did i just read?

 

[oggbashan]

The 'Scientific' paper starts with the wrong end. They postulate a theory and then try to prove it, disregrarding anything that doesn't fit. It is entirely the wrong way around and not 'scientific' at all. Any grade schooler would get an F for it.

 

[Rightguide]

The 'Scientific' paper starts with the wrong end. They postulate a theory and then try to prove it, disregrarding anything that doesn't fit. It is entirely the wrong way around and not 'scientific' at all. Any grade schooler would get an F for it.

Tell it to the Proceedings Of Academy Of Sciences. Don't whine to me, I didn't write it.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Tell it to the Proceedings Of Academy Of Sciences. Don't whine to me, I didn't write it.

So you agree that the finds are valid. Wow I'm shocked!!

 

[oggbashan]

Tell it to the Proceedings Of Academy Of Sciences. Don't whine to me, I didn't write it.

I'm disgusted that such an unscientific study wasn't killed at birth. it doesn't say much for academic discipline in the US.

 

[Rightguide]

I'm disgusted that such an unscientific study wasn't killed at birth. it doesn't say much for academic discipline in the US.

Ah, we can agree for a change. It is a pathetic illustration of how scientific rigor and inquiry have been totally politicized to the detriment of us all.

 

[oggbashan]

Ah, we can agree for a change. It is a pathetic illustration of how scientific rigor and inquiry have been totally politicized to the detriment of us all.

Then why the fuck did you start this thread?