Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quietly applauds from the peanut gallery.MissTaken said:I went on a date with a vanilla gentlman today.
We had a wonderful time and yes, WD, we had a bit of "that" talk.
He actually brought it up by way of making flirtatious comments about spanking and bondage. So, finally, I sat him down and we talked about interests and limits.
I wonder, while I went to this date thinking he was very non BDSM and I left the date knowing he is into kink and perhaps, BDSM, is it likely that I am naturally and perhaps, unconciously drawn to fellow freaksters?
In any event, why think too much about it. We had a wonderful day and will be seeing one another again.
![]()
This mirrors my thoughts completely. Regardless of the 'type' of relationship, it wouldn't make sense to committ to each other unless the two of you had already explored each others desires and needs, and could accept each other for the persons that you are. (I'm assuming that an intense love, and desire to spend an indefinite period of time with that person already exists)s'lara said:Alternatively, hold on to your desire and hold out for someone who is willing to accept all aspects of you ... BDSM related or not.
lara
Croctden said:I don't believe you choose who you like. I've never thought, "gee I ought to like that woman." I've been attracted to vanilla women in the past, but nothing incredibly serious. I struggle to think it wise just turn my back on a great woman over one issue. I think I'd just have to cross that bridge when I come to it.
Pure said:
There's another wrinkle, not mentioned by Croct or catalina, but hinted at by some others, including Miss T. "Straight' of 'vanilla' are not 'out there'. Even Baptist missionaries have kinks, it's a matter of finding them.
Lastly, a 'domly' relationship might have little to do with sex. The guy simply wants to call the shots, have dinner ready when he gets home, and --maybe--be able to order up a blow job during dessert. In that case the two had better agree, and the 'domly' one needs a traditional or 'subbie' female(male) to say, "yes sir, no sir, three bags full"; and who answers 'how high?" when he)she) says "jump."
J.
Have to agree with you on this Miss T. First thing it said to me was abusive relationship.MissTaken said:
As for the issue of Domliness outside of the bedroom only, I would forewarn anyone who thinks that describes there new friend, be aware that control is one issue, exchanging power and control is another. Pure's description could almost describe an abusive control freak. So, make sure you get something back from said Dom.
Exchange, baby!
![]()
NemoAlia said:Would, did, and am.
I've had no D/s for a good long while now. It's easier for me than it is for him, I think, 'cause he's always afraid he's not satisfying me and I'm just being nice. I think he expects me to break down one of these days and say he just doesn't do it for me. I don't expect to, though.