Lance Rides a Mean Bike...

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
Lance Rides a Mean Bike...

...but he should just shut up about Iraq, before he digs the hole any deeper.

As a man who knows and has supported Bush, having met him "around twenty times", Armstrong had this to say about his country's president. "Bush is a hard man, cleverer than people think, but he is sometimes pretty rough in his dialogue. Bush is no banker from New York, and no rancher from California, he is a cowboy from Texas."

Despite voting for Bush in the last election, Armstrong was definite about one thing. "I am no fan of war. Also I'm no fan of a dictator such as Saddam Hussein and equally not of terrorism. But it is wrong to go to the front without support from the UN and Europe."

Do you speak now as an American living in Europe? "Definitely. If it comes to war, you have to make it with a billion Muslims. It's not sensible for the United States to stand alone in a conflict with such an important part of the world's population. Then every American citizen will also fear for their lives."

Still, a war would not stop Armstrong from riding the Tour de France this year. "It would give me extra headaches, but it would not prevent me from riding the Tour," he said.

Fuck you, Lance and the BIKE you rode in on!
 
LadyGuinivere said:
Is it safe to assume you will be enlisting, BB?

Where?

Is it the only way to serve ones country by enlisting?

Kindly avoid stupid comments and opinions.......if you can.
 
What was stupid about that?

I asked a serious question. Yes or No?

Sheesh.
 
Im 46, I will not enlist.

I asked you a question.

Do you believe that the only way to SUPPORT my country is by enlisting?
 
Okay, I wasn't aware there was an age limit.

No, BB, there are other ways, but you're so into the bombing and killing, judging by your sig's, I assumed you would want to be front and center, that's all.
 
My stupid comment retort was meant to your usual comments.

I AM for bombing and killing Arabs/Muslims.....better a million or ten million or 50 million of them then 5 of us.....

Theya re evil and vile and murderous........and should be dealt with.........

I understand those that believe that that is wrong and they can be dealt with...........I DONT!
 
I don't think this is so much a huge concern about War and Terrorism for Lance. It's more the fact that he's an American abroad. He only actually lives in the USA a few months a year. The rest of the year he's in Europe living and training. He's clearly stated that he is worried about his safety and his chance of riding in the Tour if we go to war. So I think much of his statement is self-serving rather than meant to be shear critism for the President. If the US goes it alone without France and the rest of the UN, he has a legitmate concern to be worried about riding in the Tour.
 
What is this shit about the US going "alone"?

Dont you follow the news at all?

You mean that the US MUST have the elicit approval of France, dont you? I ask WHY?
 
busybody said:
You mean that the US MUST have the elicit approval of France, dont you? I ask WHY? [/B]
You forgot to include Germany,Belgium and Russia................
 
Gil_Favor said:
You forgot to include Germany,Belgium and Russia................

I dint forget em.........I just dont see why we NEED to get the permission of OTHERS to defend OURSELVES?
 
busybody said:
I dint forget em.........I just dont see why we NEED to get the permission of OTHERS to defend OURSELVES?
We dont....But what do I know, Im just one of Lits racists:D
 
busybody said:
What is this shit about the US going "alone"?

Dont you follow the news at all?

You mean that the US MUST have the elicit approval of France, dont you? I ask WHY?

Excuse me, "US goes it without UN support". Sorry for not dotting all my i's and crossing my t's. Yes, I follow the news somewhat, but I don't spend my whole day reading it like you.

I actually did not say I think we need or want France. I was meerly stating what I thought the motivation was for Lance to make those statements. Personally, I could care less if France decides to join us or not. We obviously do not need them. But thanks for putting words in my mouth, busybody.

PBW
 
busybody said:
I dint forget em.........I just dont see why we NEED to get the permission of OTHERS to defend OURSELVES?

Shows what you know. We depend on the countries geographically closer to our enemy to provide our vantage points. Do you think we can attack Iraq from Hawaii?
 
busybody said:
Funny, I never saw you as a racist....but WTF do I know? :confused:
I dont see myself that way either,But since that little puke Marxist called me one, it must be so.......:D
 
No we cant.........but our bombers are capable of being refueled.......

And if the French et al refuse help does that mean we are hamstrung? Or should we be?

We have to defend ourselves and we can work around the logistic problems!
 
As a conservative person, one who voted for GWB, I would like to say that real conservatives, Republicans, and other assorted persons that are right of center are not affiliated with Busybody in any way. His opinions do not reflect the opinions of the majority of the conservative constituent base. Most of us prefer not to kill others simply because they are muslims/arabs. Unlike Mr. Body and his mutant political agenda, we recognize that because a handful of fanatics are the enemy, it does not make an entire religious group nor an entire race of people the enemy.

Conservatives, on the whole, do not stand for genocide.

Thank you for your attention. We will now turn you over to your regularly scheduled, mindless, Busybody ranting.
 
Pancake

I too do not wish to kill Muslims/Arabs, however sine this war was declared upon us by them......and it is virtually impossible to distinguis between a "moderate" Muslim and a terrorist one.....what are we supposed to do?

Maybe we should have all of them in the US watched, have their movements monitored......

It is they that have called on "Death to America" "Death to Infidels".....it is they that want to kill us all.....

WHAT SHOULD WE DO?

If you talk of root causes........spare me!
 
busybody said:


Kindly avoid stupid comments and opinions.......if you can.

Why? You don't.

Murdering 5 or 10 million people to save 5 or 10? Hitler would be proud of you. Stalin too. Osama Bin Laden and his cohorts have succeeded in their task. They have you shaking in your boots.

Do a little math you freak. If there are 1 billion Muslims in the world and they were all hell bent on destroying us there woulkd be a whole lot more dead bodies around don't ya think? Let's walk through it shall we. We'll assume a simple majority of Muslims are murderous savages (as you have characterized them). That would be 500 million and ONE. So where is the carnage? I'm willing to bet there are more Iranian muslims dead at the hands of the Shah (put in power and supported by our own government) and at the hands of Saddam Hussein (also helped to power by us) in gas and biological attacks (materials supplied by Reagan and Rumsfeld so that we could glean actual battlefield effectiveness data from Hussein's use) than US victims of Islamic terrorism. That doesn't even include Hussein's victims in his own country. He was Reagan's "Our Man in Baghdad" during the 80's.

Go wrap your self in duct tape until your fear subsides.

Dipshit.
 
No, AIDS is killing millions of Africans.

Maybe they are trying to develope nukes because we have them and they feel threatened. We have and do throw our weight around pretty heavily in that area.

All the Arabs would have to do to kill us(or maybe just hurt us real bad) is stop selling us cheap oil. Just look at the yuppies crying about how much it is costing to fill up their SUV's these days.

There are enough Muslim's in this country right now to cause some serious damage if they were so inclined. They apparently are not.

My guess is busybody and Hanns don't play chess. Too much logic involved.
 
Back
Top