LA Times refuses to release video of Obama praising PLO mouthpiece

M

miles

Guest
Great. Just fucking great.

The Los Angeles Times is refusing to release a videotape that it says shows Barack Obama praising a Chicago professor who was an alleged mouthpiece for the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was a designated terrorist group in the 1970s and '80s.

According an LA Times article written by Peter Wallsten in April, Obama was a "friend and frequent dinner companion" of Rashid Khalidi, who from 1976 to1982 was reportedly a director of the official Palestinian press agency, WAFA, which was operating in exile from Beirut with the PLO.

Click here to read the original LA Times story: 'Palestinians See a Friend in Barack Obama.'

In the article -- based on the videotape obtained by the Times -- Wallsten said Obama addressed an audience during a 2003 farewell dinner for Khalidi, who was Obama's colleague at the University of Chicago, before his departure for Columbia University in New York. Obama said his many talks with Khalidi and his wife Mona stood as "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases."

Khalidi is currently the Edward Said professor of Arab Studies at Columbia. A pro-Palestinian activist, he has been a fierce critic of American foreign policy and of Israel, which he has accused of establishing an "apartheid system" of government. The PLO advocate helped facilitate negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in the early '90s, but he has denied he was ever an employee of the group, contradicting accounts in the New York Times and Washington Times.

The LA Times told FOXNews.com that it won't reveal how it obtained the tape of Khalidi's farewell party, nor will the newspaper release it. Spokeswoman Nancy Sullivan said the paper is not interested in revisiting the story. "As far as we're concerned, the story speaks for itself," she said.

The newspaper reported Tuesday evening in a story on its Web site that the tape was from a confidential source.

"The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it," the Times' editor, Russ Stanton, said. "The Times keeps its promises to sources."

In recent months Obama has distanced himself from the man the Times says he once called a friend. "He is not one of my advisers. He's not one of my foreign policy people," Obama said at a campaign event in May. "He is a respected scholar, although he vehemently disagrees with a lot of Israel's policy."

But on the tape, according to the Times, Obama said in his toast that he hoped his relationship with Khalidi would continue even after the professor left Chicago. "It's for that reason that I'm hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation -- a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid's dinner table ... [but around] this entire world."

A number of Web sites have accused the Times of purposely suppressing the tape of the event -- which former Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn reportedly attended.

Sullivan said she would not give details of what else may be on the tape, adding that anyone interested in the video should read the newspaper's report, which was its final account.

"This is a story that we reported on six months ago, so any suggestion that we're suppressing the tape is absurd -- we're the ones that brought the existence of the tape to light," Sullivan said.

The Los Angeles Times endorsed Obama for president on October 19.
 
who believes the news media anyways ? Dont ya know they get paid to deliver junk ! No Proof ? no Names ? none of this or none of that and they cant give out names as to whom gave them something to report when there wasnt anyone in doing so . Junk-Junk-Junk !
 
who believes the news media anyways ? Dont ya know they get paid to deliver junk ! No Proof ? no Names ? none of this or none of that and they cant give out names as to whom gave them something to report when there wasnt anyone in doing so . Junk-Junk-Junk !

The Times can at least release the transcript without violating their source. Why won't they?
 
its MORE important to kow what Palin spent on dresses and about her tanning bed

the other stuff about BAM is chaff

deal with it

move on

BAM is COOL, we need COOL
 
SO, LET'S SEE IF WE HAVE THIS STRAIGHT...:


McCain campaign accuses L.A. Times of 'suppressing' Obama video : The Times says its promise to a source prevents the paper from posting the video, which shows Barack Obama praising Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi at a 2003 banquet. The story first appeared in April. (By a Times staff writer, October 28, 2008, LA Times)


John McCain's presidential campaign today accused the Los Angeles Times of "intentionally suppressing" a videotape it obtained of a 2003 banquet where then-state Sen. Barack Obama spoke of his friendship with Rashid Khalidi, a leading Palestinian scholar and activist. The Times first reported on the videotape in an April 2008 story about Obama's ties with Palestinians and Jews as he navigated the politics of Chicago. [...]

The Times today issued a statement about its decision not to post the tape.

"The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it," said the newspaper's editor, Russ Stanton. "The Times keeps its promises to sources."


...on the one hand the press maintains that its obligation to publish that which is newsworthy is so weighty that it even trumps national security and the possibility that lives would be endangered, but, on the other hand, now asks us to accept that a paper's promise is more important than newsworthiness? So, unless my math is screwy, they place self-interest above the national interest and human life? No?:rolleyes:
 
Bullshit!

The New York Times has a video of Palin fucking a moose and they are holding it back.

The MSM is clearly in the tank for McCain.
 
Just another snow job.

This truth is the crux of the matter and says it loudest right here.....

"some Palestinian American leaders believing that Obama is more receptive to their viewpoint than he is willing to say. Their belief is not drawn from Obama's speeches or campaign literature, but from comments that some say Obama made in private and from his association with the Palestinian American community in his hometown of Chicago, including his presence at events where anger at Israeli and U.S. Middle East policy was freely expressed."


and..


" And both sides, on certain issues, have interpreted Obama's remarks as supporting their point of view.

Last year, for example, Obama was quoted saying that "nobody's suffering more than the Palestinian people." The candidate later said the remark had been taken out of context, and that he meant that the Palestinians were suffering "from the failure of the Palestinian leadership in Gaza to recognize Israel" and to renounce violence.

Jewish leaders were satisfied with Obama's explanation, but some Palestinian leaders took the original quotation as a sign of the candidate's empathy for their plight.


Two-faced liar


Odd that there's no mention of Obama's date for the event ... William Ayers
 
"The PLO advocate helped facilitate negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in the early '90s."

So which was he? A diplomat or a terrorist?
 
The Times can at least release the transcript without violating their source. Why won't they?

Because they were threatened to have backwards "Bs" carved on the sides of their cheeks from big, scary Black Mens if they were to do it.
 
man...that must be some fucking kick-ass Kool-Aid Obama's sheep've been drinkin'.
 
Someone mentioned this above, but seeing as I've posted this in the two other threads already covering this topic - might as well make it a hat-trick.



"During the 1990s, while he served as chairman of the International Republican Institute, John McCain distributed several grants to the Palestinian research center co-founded by Rashid Khalidi, including one worth half a million dollars.

A 1998 tax filing for the McCain-led group shows a $448,873 grant to Khalidi's Center for Palestine Research and Studies for work in the West Bank."
 
You might find this interesting.
About an hour ago Fox was interviewing an Obama spokesman who insisted there was nothing damaging on the tape.
The interviewer then suggested the Obama campaign request that the tape be released to prove the point.
The Obama spokesman remained silent.
 
You might find this interesting.
About an hour ago Fox was interviewing an Obama spokesman who insisted there was nothing damaging on the tape.
The interviewer then suggested the Obama campaign request that the tape be released to prove the point.
The Obama spokesman remained silent.

"The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it," the Times' editor, Russ Stanton, said. "The Times keeps its promises to sources."

I'm sure it is all Obama's doing that the tape hasn't been released.

He was also in hawaii to photoshop his birth certificate.
 
So the LA Times is reporting on the content of a video they won't release...

How much more non-news are we gonna have to put up with before the election?
 
"The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it," the Times' editor, Russ Stanton, said. "The Times keeps its promises to sources."

I'm sure it is all Obama's doing that the tape hasn't been released.

He was also in hawaii to photoshop his birth certificate.

You're buying that, aren't you?
 
You're buying that, aren't you?

Dude. You know how much Photoshop costs these days? Are you saying that Obama would spend taxpayer's money on an expensive and clearly elitist graphics program used by liberalistic designers worldwide just to fake his birthdate?
 
Dude. You know how much Photoshop costs these days? Are you saying that Obama would spend taxpayer's money on an expensive and clearly elitist graphics program used by liberalistic designers worldwide just to fake his birthdate?

he spends 1500 on a suit

he spent 7,500,000 on the Greek shit around his acceptance speech

SURE HE WOULD!
 
Back
Top