Katie Hobbs Accused Of Receiving Sinaloa Cartel Bribes

[Rightguide]

Katie Hobbs accused of receiving Sinaloa cartel bribes​

"Katie Hobbs and Runbeck election services have been named as recipients of Sinaloa cartel bribes via deeds of trust and phony mortgages in AZ senate investigation."

A California-based law firm has accused Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, Runbeck Election Services, and a slew of other election officials, mayors, judges, city councilman, and county supervisors in the state of receiving bribes from the Sinaloa cartel.

During a Thursday hearing before the Senate Elections and Municipal Oversight & Elections Joint Committee, the principal investigator for Harris/Thaler Law Corporation, Jacqueline Breger, presented their shocking findings, detailing how a money-laundering investigation in the midwest revealed alleged corruption in Arizona.

"In 2006, the U.S. Attorney's Offices in Illinois, Indiana and Iowa investigated the laundering of drug cartel monies through a complex series of single-family home purchases in those states," Breger told the committee. "By 2009, numerous real estate agents, escrow companies and title insurers had been indicted, charged and convicted of racketeering. In 2014, our office was asked to review the case files and to determine whether monies from the sales of the properties had filtered to property purchases in Arizona, specifically in Maricopa and Pima County."

More here: https://thepostmillennial.com/katie...ving-sinaloa-cartel-bribes?utm_campaign=64487

Why are Democrats so inherently corrupt? One wonders if they were involved in financing her campaign.

 

[schism666]

your threads on arizona elections go so well for you, vette. lol.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

your threads on arizona elections go so well for you, vette. lol.

So according to wrongways article election fraud has been rampant in Arizona since 2004. So who got elected back then? Republicans?

 

[icanhelp1]

Katie Hobbs accused of receiving Sinaloa cartel bribes​

"Katie Hobbs and Runbeck election services have been named as recipients of Sinaloa cartel bribes via deeds of trust and phony mortgages in AZ senate investigation."

A California-based law firm has accused Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, Runbeck Election Services, and a slew of other election officials, mayors, judges, city councilman, and county supervisors in the state of receiving bribes from the Sinaloa cartel.

During a Thursday hearing before the Senate Elections and Municipal Oversight & Elections Joint Committee, the principal investigator for Harris/Thaler Law Corporation, Jacqueline Breger, presented their shocking findings, detailing how a money-laundering investigation in the midwest revealed alleged corruption in Arizona.

"In 2006, the U.S. Attorney's Offices in Illinois, Indiana and Iowa investigated the laundering of drug cartel monies through a complex series of single-family home purchases in those states," Breger told the committee. "By 2009, numerous real estate agents, escrow companies and title insurers had been indicted, charged and convicted of racketeering. In 2014, our office was asked to review the case files and to determine whether monies from the sales of the properties had filtered to property purchases in Arizona, specifically in Maricopa and Pima County."

More here: https://thepostmillennial.com/katie...ving-sinaloa-cartel-bribes?utm_campaign=64487

Why are Democrats so inherently corrupt? One wonders if they were involved in financing her campaign.

The subject matter will probably get buried like all the other stories that shine a light on democrat corruption. I wonder since it's a potential RICO issue if Mr. Garland is aware of it. I'm not going to jump to conclusions but it is an interesting story. We got our hands full with Georgie boy Soros.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The subject matter will probably get buried like all the other stories that shine a light on democrat corruption. I wonder since it's a potential RICO issue if Mr. Garland is aware of it. I'm not going to jump to conclusions but it is an interesting story. We got our hands full with Georgie boy Soros.

It goes back to 2004, that is a tad before Katies time isn't it? Maybe you should be checking on all the other names on that list of 10,000 or so in the article.

 

[ll74]

The only reason this is even getting noticed by the right is because they lost the election and haven't accepted it. They've already decided that Katie Hobbs is not only guilty but she's complisate in the criminal activity.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The two fuck brains didn't even read the article, one just read the headlines and posted it, the other, just jumped on the bandwagon....

 

[Rightguide]

The subject matter will probably get buried like all the other stories that shine a light on democrat corruption. I wonder since it's a potential RICO issue if Mr. Garland is aware of it. I'm not going to jump to conclusions but it is an interesting story. We got our hands full with Georgie boy Soros.

I wonder if Soros can be prosecuted or investigated as a subversive influence under 18 USC 2384:

§ 2384 – Seditious conspiracy. If two or more people in the U.S. conspire to overthrow, destroy, or oppose the U.S. government by force or to prevent the application of the law or to take property of the U.S. contrary to its authority, they can be imprisoned for up to 20 years.

 

[schism666]

I wonder since it's a potential RICO issue if Mr. Garland is aware of it.

yeah, you're far more informed than garland.

 

[ll74]

I wonder if Soros can be prosecuted or investigated as a subversive influence under 18 USC 2384:

§ 2384 – Seditious conspiracy. If two or more people in the U.S. conspire to overthrow, destroy, or oppose the U.S. government by force or to prevent the application of the law or to take property of the U.S. contrary to its authority, they can be imprisoned for up to 20 years.

I'm just curious how you will involve Hunter in this.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I wonder if Soros can be prosecuted or investigated as a subversive influence under 18 USC 2384:

§ 2384 – Seditious conspiracy. If two or more people in the U.S. conspire to overthrow, destroy, or oppose the U.S. government by force or to prevent the application of the law or to take property of the U.S. contrary to its authority, they can be imprisoned for up to 20 years.

The chances of Soros being prosecuted is about the same chance as you being prosecuted for stupidity....I'd guess 2/10th is your answer...

 

[icanhelp1]

I wonder if Soros can be prosecuted or investigated as a subversive influence under 18 USC 2384:

§ 2384 – Seditious conspiracy. If two or more people in the U.S. conspire to overthrow, destroy, or oppose the U.S. government by force or to prevent the application of the law or to take property of the U.S. contrary to its authority, they can be imprisoned for up to 20 years.

I would think they would have a better chance at nailing him on skirting federal campaign finance regulations and laws (FICA).

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/george-soros-criminal-justice-reform-227519

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/79630.pdf

https://www.politico.com/story/2007/08/soros-linked-group-hit-with-huge-fine-005555

https://apnews.com/article/5bfc373e1a3349e59c19f60d3f6ca082

Where there's smoke there's fire.

 

[ll74]

I would think they would have a better chance at nailing him on skirting federal campaign finance regulations and laws (FICA).

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/george-soros-criminal-justice-reform-227519

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/79630.pdf

https://www.politico.com/story/2007/08/soros-linked-group-hit-with-huge-fine-005555

Where there's smoke there's fire.

Which laws did he violate specifically?

 

[icanhelp1]

Which laws did he violate specifically?

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/79630.pdf

Not that filing charges against him would amount to a hill of beans.

 

[schism666]

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/79630.pdf

Not that filing charges against him would amount to a hill of beans.

the charges that don't and won't exist would amount to nothing?

 

[ll74]

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/79630.pdf

Not that filing charges against him would amount to a hill of beans.

The filing was in 2004 and resulted in a fine

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/soros-linked-group-hit-with-huge-fine/

You have something more current that he violated? The majority of this was just exceeding donation limits, which basically was trashed by citizens united since then.

 

[Rightguide]

I would think they would have a better chance at nailing him on skirting federal campaign finance regulations and laws (FICA).

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/george-soros-criminal-justice-reform-227519

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/79630.pdf

https://www.politico.com/story/2007/08/soros-linked-group-hit-with-huge-fine-005555

https://apnews.com/article/5bfc373e1a3349e59c19f60d3f6ca082

Where there's smoke there's fire.

Whatever it takes. He's financing what amounts to anarchy.

 

[ll74]

Whatever it takes. He's financing what amounts to anarchy.

He's financing reform. The Koch brothers have done the same, as has the federalist society, which has much more power.

 

[icanhelp1]

He's financing reform. The Koch brothers have done the same, as has the federalist society, which has much more power.

Maybe in your mind he’s financing reform. But that’s not the issue. Peddling soft money,* possibly violating BCRA 2002 * to influence federal elecions.

Violating [ 2 USC 437g ] or IRSC code [ 26 USC 527 ] registering with the IRS.

Soros possibly peddled up to 40 million in soft money to affect federal elections favoring progressive soft on crime DAs and federal prosecutors. Foreigners influencing our elections with soft money should be a concern for all Americans.

 

[ll74]

Maybe in your mind he’s financing reform. But that’s not the issue. Peddling soft money,* possibly violating BCRA 2002 * to influence federal elecions.

Violating [ 2 USC 437g ] or IRSC code [ 26 USC 527 ] registering with the IRS.

Soros possibly peddled up to 40 million in soft money to affect federal elections favoring progressive soft on crime DAs and federal prosecutors. Foreigners influencing our elections with soft money should be a concern for all Americans.

You're referencing a case that was already settled from 2004.

He's funding candidates who back reform. There's nothing illegal about it.

You wanting something to be illegal doesnt make it illegal.