ChinoMoreno
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2017
- Posts
- 2,335
Kash Patel
- Thread starter Rebel5soul
- Start date
Oh lets hope you take to the streets! This ISNT 2016! its NOTHING LIKE last timeI Your gonna witness arrests, your gonna witness trials and you will witness the penalties handed out! But by all means , I wouldnt advise you sheeple to raise any hell! Maybe you should read this great article from May 17th 2021 in the liberal rag known as Newsweek!
https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-inside-militarys-secret-undercover-army-1591881
Trust me, they are waiting...with open arms!
Youve had the last 4 years to destroy this country! Now its OUR turn to destroy the commies who tried but failed miserably to destroy this country! We will show you how its done! Get your
!Attachments
America is a free society and a constitutional republic.
You seem to advocate destroying the Constitution, or at least repealing the Bill of Rights, Legislative and Judicial Branches, and abolishing democracy and freedom.
You also believe, like in all dictatorships, that the executive branch should be above the law, above the Geneva Conventions, and have absolute unchecked power to flout the Constitution and the law.
The Majority of Americans do not agree with you, believe it or not. And when their freedoms and livleihoods are threatened, they WILL fight back. The last four years have been trying to repair the damage to the country that Trump caused, and the sooner he is done the better to get this country back on track.
You wouldn't know this. I'm pretty convinced you are NOT an American, have never set foot in America, and know nothing about how our country works, it's government or it's traditions. Especially since you seem to gloat in their destruction.
You seem to advocate destroying the Constitution, or at least repealing the Bill of Rights, Legislative and Judicial Branches, and abolishing democracy and freedom.
You also believe, like in all dictatorships, that the executive branch should be above the law, above the Geneva Conventions, and have absolute unchecked power to flout the Constitution and the law.
The Majority of Americans do not agree with you, believe it or not. And when their freedoms and livleihoods are threatened, they WILL fight back. The last four years have been trying to repair the damage to the country that Trump caused, and the sooner he is done the better to get this country back on track.
You wouldn't know this. I'm pretty convinced you are NOT an American, have never set foot in America, and know nothing about how our country works, it's government or it's traditions. Especially since you seem to gloat in their destruction.
You kinda stupid!
You better figure out what is going on in this country! But you will find out very soon! Trumps speaks March4th! Inauguration Day, but you are too stupid to know this! Maybe look it up! Thats inauguration day ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION! And from here on out it will be Inauguration day again! And when nothing is on TV but trials, pay attention to those getting charged with going against their oath to the CONSTITUTION! In other words TREASON! Theres a few....hundred thousand! Maybe you should go to the SouthernDistrict courts websites, they are easy to find , and OPEN your EYES and LOOK and read the page after page after page after page of sealed indictments! Did we make that many mistakes? Or is this just a bad dream? If I was a bettin man,Id choose the latter! Dont ever talk to us about the Constitution when your party of kiddie perverts didnt abide by the CONSTITUTION FROM DAY 1! What time did Commie Joe get sworn in? LOL that fucker broke his oath before he was even sworn in! Actually he wasent sworn in, he had a military funeral preformed for him! Go watch it! Theres 17 things in his inauguration that are only preformed at military funerals! Yes,you really re the party of stupid communists!
Last edited:
Give me ONE ExAMPLE where Trump broke the constitution! One! Trust me, if he did, hed be dead! Like we told you clowns over and over , these trials were. SHAMS and whoever concocted these SHAMS and attrmptrd to carry them out... these people are the ones you will see in tribun...errr trials! Get your popcorn out, its gonna be loads of fun! By the way, this is called the Boomerang. Everything they tried with Trump is getting thrown righ back at em....10 fold!
Heres another little secret so you dont have to look so stupid! Live coverage from FT knox? Why?why do we we have so much interest in the GOLD? Any clue? We're going to Gold AND SILVER BACKED DOLLAR And so your not shocked were getting rid of Maritime Law! Were going back to CONSTITUTIONAL LAW! Common Law! If I were you Id go get a copy of the Constitution and start studying it! Your gonna need it!
You're talking like some QAnon nutcase now.
Go look Brainiac! Go check out Biden inauguration. Look up what time Biden got sworn in why was there,,this is hilarious, a 3 gun volley?Go look! Look up what a 3 gun volley is! Then go watch the inauguration. LOOK LOOK OPEN YOUR EYES and LOOK!
It isn't coming.
There was nothing unusual about Biden's inauguration. It was not a funeral and he was not dead.
Lol You have no clue whats going on! Not a fucking clue!You wont listen to Trump, but you listen to communist media, who tells you what Trump said or cuts out when he says something they dont want you to hear! Its funny as hell! Its called brainwashing 101 , in other words Trump derangement syndrome and you are all affected by it! HILA RIOUS! Lol are you gonna listen to him on the 4th of March? Lol or remain in the dark?
Now SEE! How can you say there was nothing wring with it? Wtf?? There were 17 things in that inauguration depicted a military funeral! How the fuck can you say there was nothing wrong with it! IT. STARTED 17 minutes early!!! Now go see what the CONSTITUTION says about a idiot who gets sworn in 17 minutes before noon!
We're ready for that!Oh lets hope you take to the streets! This ISNT 2016! its NOTHING LIKE last timeI Your gonna witness arrests, your gonna witness trials and you will witness the penalties handed out! But by all means , I wouldnt advise you sheeple to raise any hell! Maybe you should read this great article from May 17th 2021 in the liberal rag known as Newsweek!
https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-inside-militarys-secret-undercover-army-1591881
Trust me, they are waiting...with open arms!
Youve had the last 4 years to destroy this country! Now its OUR turn to destroy the commies who tried but failed miserably to destroy this country! We will show you how its done! Get your
The Constitution says nothing at all about that.
What's more, there is no legal significance to whether a courtroom flag has a fringe.
And when the military turned their backs on his limo! Thats in the video! 3 rifles shot in the air is a 3 gun Volly! Go look it up! Lol Jesus christ, your gonna be one of those fuckers that ends up in a rubber room when you find out what going on under your nose! HILARIOUS Lol
Trump is not going to have a second inaugural or something on March 4.
What's more, the 16th Amendment is properly part of the Constitution, Federal Reserve notes are legal tender, and you are not a "sovereign citizen" or "freeman on the land." I know your kind.
Signs of pseudolaw[edit]
Much like pseudoscience, one of the first hints that a legal theory is pseudolaw is when it bucks against established legal consensus and precedent. However, while necessary, this is not a sufficient condition. Much of currently accepted law was once against precedent. The primary thing to look for is if the legal theory or argument has been tried before a court and whether it was rejected. If an argument has been rejected by the courts on a repeated basis, it is usually, but not invariably, the case that someone attempting to push that argument is practicing pseudolaw.While the ultimate test of pseudolaw is how it is ultimately perceived and used in a court of law (just as with pseudoscience, the ultimate test is how it performs with predictions against empirical reality), there are many red flags that can identify pseudolaw even without a court ruling. These include, but are not limited to:
- Overreliance on technicalities such as spelling or grammar. For example, some people argue that the traditional use of all-capital letters for names in court briefings means that the documents are referring to a different entity than the actual person in the case.[3] See, for instance, David Wynn Miller.
- Overreliance on dictionary definitions, particularly definitions from outdated copies of Black's Law Dictionary – a common US claim is that driver's licenses are not necessary for most drivers, since older copies of Black's Law define driving as the transport of commercial goods, and the right to travel via conveyance (including a motor vehicle) supposedly extends to operating said vehicle as well.
- Belief in and use of common lay-person misconceptions about the law. The pseudolawyer may perpetuate the idea that a contract can only be created by a written form and signature, that you can't be convicted of murder without a body, that permission isn't necessary to upload a copyrighted work as long as you admit "I do not own this," etc.
- Quoting Supreme Court cases out of context, usually one or two sentences, or sometimes even a phrase. Tax protesters are fond of quoting Supreme Court opinions that say that the Sixteenth Amendment "conferred no new power of taxation." Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916); see also Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916) to argue that the income tax is illegal. However, the ruling is not saying that the 16th Amendment did not provide power to tax income, but rather that Congress already had that power. This is classic quote mining.
- Reference to other arguments that have been rejected as frivolous by courts. Pseudolaw concepts flock together and cross-pollinate.
- Arguments that refer to the United States of America as "Incorporated[4]" or to the Federal government somehow seeming to be a private enterprise or company.[5]
- Jurisdictional challenges that focus on claiming the federal government has no right to try cases in states. A favorite is to claim that any court with gold fringe on the flag is a "maritime" court and not a real court.[6]
- Arguments that the court, police, public officials, etc. have no authority over an individual unless that individual has consented to that authority. This is often phrased along the lines of "once you accept an attorney, you're bound by contract to the court, but if you refuse an attorney they have no authority." As an adjunct to these arguments, some hold the belief that it's possible to unwittingly consent to authority, such as if you sign your name on a Federal form or receive a Federal "benefit" such as receiving mail at your home's mailbox.
- Intense hatred of lawyers and the bar, reference to the bar as being run by the Illuminati or Masons, and encouraging people with little to no legal training to refuse appointed attorneys and proceed pro se.[7]
- References to the Titles of Nobility Amendment (the so-called "missing 13th Amendment" to the United States Constitution). Similarly, some pseudolawyers even argue that persons who use the title of "Esquire" (generally practicing attorneys)[note 1] are not Citizens and cannot hold public office.[8]
- Arguments that the Fourteenth Amendment created a new class of "subject citizens" (lowercase c) of the Federal government, separate and distinct from the true Citizens (capital C) of the united States (lowercase u) that co-exist with them.
- References to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Wikipedia%27s_W.svg/12px-Wikipedia%27s_W.svg.png in cases which do not involve private commercial transactions (for example, citing the UCC in criminal, traffic, and tax cases).[9]
- References to "admiralty law" or "maritime law" in cases which clearly do not involve any matters which occurred at sea, in navigable waters, or outside the Earth's atmosphere.
- References to "military" or "martial law" in matters that do not involve the military or members thereof.
- Made up jargon from Latin that pseudolawyers claim derive from common law and give people special rights that others do not such as juris spurious when used in filing claims.[10]
- Misuse of legal terminology, often because pseudolawyers do not have a full understanding of the concepts they are attempting to discuss.
- Extraordinary claims such as being able to get anyone out of jail, no matter what they were convicted of, in a matter of weeks.[11]
Keep telling yourself that! You may just end up in Greenland yet!
Is Greenland going to be the new Siberia?
IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 74,229
https://66.media.tumblr.com/6d9747ec63fac7caa26fd5f6b902fabc/tumblr_pt9g32PRLs1sscb7qo1_640.gif
knock back a shot of Schnapps or somethin' before someone puts a tranq dart in yer neck, yeeeeesh.
Wake up
"WAKE UP" (almost always in all-caps) is a common emotional appeal and ad hominem phrase used by hardcore anti-vaxxers, anti-GMO proponents, white supremacists, and other whack-jobs, although the phrase is almost universally associated with conspiracy theorists. The phrase was popular among radical left-wing activists in the 1980s and 1990s (see the Rage Against the Machine song of the same name), but was adopted by other groups who felt their worldviews were being ignored or rejected by society. Its usage is usually an indicator that you've wandered into the nuttier tin-foil hat section of the Internet.
Typically, the phrase will be at the beginning or end of a rant, and will be followed by whomever the rant is being directed at. Here are three examples:
"WAKE UP" (almost always in all-caps) is a common emotional appeal and ad hominem phrase used by hardcore anti-vaxxers, anti-GMO proponents, white supremacists, and other whack-jobs, although the phrase is almost universally associated with conspiracy theorists. The phrase was popular among radical left-wing activists in the 1980s and 1990s (see the Rage Against the Machine song of the same name), but was adopted by other groups who felt their worldviews were being ignored or rejected by society. Its usage is usually an indicator that you've wandered into the nuttier tin-foil hat section of the Internet.
Typically, the phrase will be at the beginning or end of a rant, and will be followed by whomever the rant is being directed at. Here are three examples:
- "WAKE UP, AMERICA!!!!!"
- "WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!!!!!!!!!"[2]
- "CHEMTRAILS, GMOS, and a MILLION other ways the JEWminatti are trying to KILL us, but nevermind stay ignorant you've already chosen your fate WAKE UP!!!!!"
Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 6,509
Triggered much? LMAO!!!!!!!!!
Wat_Tyler
Allah's Favorite
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2004
- Posts
- 68,596
Similar threads
