Kamala’s 2024 Presidential Run

Equal treatment under the law.

You send us to war, to take lives, we come home and feel compelled to save lives.

Nasty business. Taking lives. You don't have to experience that. Thank the next guy you fuck over...

Another bit of drama.

Never call women dramatic or emotional again. Fucksakes you are your own soap opera.

😄
 
You don't see anything besides your country changing for the better while you try to drag us back to the 50s.
You wish.

The USA was on top of the world before we enabled the shitheads of the world to rhetorically denigrate us and vote to take us down, take our property and give it to the fucking grasshoppers like yourself. Change for the better? I look at all of the Socialist societies that we wish to emulate and wonder how the fuck to we stop the flow of refugees from those Socialist Edens of Equality...

;) ;) :kiss:
 
And you are not only willing, but actually want to, make women's bodies property of the state to do so.

Fucking traitor.
Not at all. What I promote is freedom of choice, pro choice, the choice of also taking advantage of all the other opportunities and aid available to future mothers. Democrats don't promote those opportunities, they actually discourage those opportunities.
 
Not at all. What I promote is freedom of choice, pro choice, the choice of also taking advantage of all the other opportunities and aid available to future mothers. Democrats don't promote those opportunities, they actually discourage those opportunities.

Bullshit.

The crazy thing is that you actually believe your propaganda.

You're sick in the head.
 
You supported overturning Roe. You're an idiot.

And you're a traitor.

Plus a fucking liar. You lie about everything. It's the propaganda you consume.
Yes I did, based on legal constitutional grounds not on banning abortion. If pro choice advocates want a federal statute for abortion then convince your political leadership to get on the ball and legislate law.
 
Yes I did, based on legal constitutional grounds not on banning abortion. If pro choice advocates want a federal statute for abortion then convince your political leadership to get on the ball and legislate law.

Yuh huh. Fuck you idiot. Quit talking about "murderin' the buh-habies" if you want to be believable.

You're as bad as Trump. You're not even aware of what you're saying post to post.
 
Yes.

I pay enough as it is.

That's why I want the FairTax.org to make you pay your fucking share too...
I'd be willing to pay more taxes if our political leadership would agree to shrink the size of government and drastically cut spending. Increasing taxes while increasing spending is a highway to nowhere.
 
You wish.

The USA was on top of the world before we enabled the shitheads of the world to rhetorically denigrate us and vote to take us down, take our property and give it to the fucking grasshoppers like yourself. Change for the better? I look at all of the Socialist societies that we wish to emulate and wonder how the fuck to we stop the flow of refugees from those Socialist Edens of Equality...
You just watched a fascist take over a major American political party and you have the nerve to say this lame shit?

LOL :nana::nana::nana:
You should stop posting the first thing that comes to mind...
Fascists gotta fascist.
 
Last edited:
Yuh huh. Fuck you idiot. Quit talking about "murderin' the buh-habies" if you want to be believable.

You're as bad as Trump. You're not even aware of what you're saying post to post.
That continues to be the tell. "It's about the children" doesn't equate to any legal argument.
 
I'd be willing to pay more taxes if our political leadership would agree to shrink the size of government and drastically cut spending. Increasing taxes while increasing spending is a highway to nowhere.
More. Less. Subjective.

I want efficient. They want fair.

Now, here's the problem, to be fair, you have to attack the wealth of those best prepared to extract/protect it. To get to that wealth produces enormous inefficiencies in the governing as they gradually turn the governed into criminals in the hunt for hidden revenue(s). But, if you are consumed by wealth envy, and the left is in the final stages of feverish consumption, the stage just prior to communism, and they want that wealth and you cannot stop them, they are going to get it.

Then, we get to see what the dog does to the delivery truck when he finally catches it.

I'll settle for efficient.

FairTax.org
 
I watched a Fascist...,

Good lord, you are a fucking lunatic.

Now I know exactly who Hoffer was speaking of when he spoke of The Frustrated."
 
And the counter-protesters were there for just that - to counterprotest.
Which completely demolishes your assertion that everyone who showed up supported the known bad actors, one way or another. You're asserting a False Dilemma fallacy, claiming anyone who showed up was either in favour of removing the statues, or was a bad actor.
That has nothing to do with the matter of whether anyone protesting the removal of the statues was not doing so for racist reasons.
Your claim is that no one there could've been protesting the removal of the statues for non racist reasons. There was bad actors there, which is true, with the President at the time (Donald J. Trump) corroborating this fact by fully and clearly condemning them.

Your justification for your claim is:

1) you assert only bad actors could be against the removal of the statues
2) you don't believe it's possible non bad actors could be against the removal of the statues

Your personal say so and your personal incredulity are not valid arguments for your claim.
And Politruk is right. In light of who was behind the protest, the only way anyone who did not hold disgustingly bigoted views could have ended up participating (as opposed to counterprotesting) is if they were completely, utterly ignorant of just who was running the show. I don't see how that's possible.
There is literally a logical fallacy written explaining exactly what you're doing here:

Argument from incredulity, also known as argument from personal incredulity, appeal to common sense, or the divine fallacy,[1] is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.
What you personally find believable is not a valid argument, not here or for anything.
 
I'm butthurt...

lol



You are full of something, I would say "yourself," but the right word might be ...,
 
What it means is that you fail to comprehend where most Americans stand in regards to abortion. Most Americans including conservatives are middle road.

🙄

The procedures are also being delayed, for obvious reason: Arranging travel / travel money; availability of services at clinics in free states (backlogs), etc.

So “LATER term abortions” was also a predicted result of Dobbs that has come to pass.

A medically straightforward procedure that could have been performed locally pre-Dobbs is now an unnecessarily cruel, complicated and costly process.

But then cruelty is ALWAYS the point when / where "republicans” are involved.

🤬

JFC

SAD!!!
 
Why does Trump bug you so much that you have to come here everyday and put your anguish on full display?

I mean, where is his Fascist State? Was the plan all along to wait until his FIFTH year in office to make his move?



Would real Hitler be that patient? or would he just seize power?

Patience? Really?
 
I do note, with smug satisfaction that nothing has changed since I was a young liberal man.

Abortion was very, very important to me because I wanted to be able to just give her cab fare to the clinic and be done with it...

There was no stauncher proponent of it. But the years go by, friends go bye, and you start to realize just how short, and more importantly, how precious life is. So like a Marine on a subway platform, I tend to want to help protect the helpless from the bat-guano crazy among us.

But if you can, in your mind, just discard that tissue, then toss it.
It could have been another throw-away happen-Vance...
 
Back
Top