Kamala’s 2024 Presidential Run

[Sparky74]

Apostrophes do not denote plural.

I think we know exactly who he is and the fact that he wins speaks great volumes about the quality of his opposition, i.e., the inferiority of the product being delivered by the two major parties.

There are a LOT of very brilliant, capable and accomplished Democrats in this world. Vice-President Harris is not one of them. They need to start offering us the pick of the former instead of the politically-correct latter and Trump wouldn't be a "thing."

They're acting..., "weird."

Of course she is what utter rubbish she is not only qualified I genuinely think she will win. And banish the sexiset homophonic racist nasty nasty man forever.

 

[HisArpy]

Of course she is what utter rubbish she is not only qualified I genuinely think she will win. And banish the sexiset homophonic racist nasty nasty nan forever.

^ on the wings of prayer.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

^ on the wings of prayer.

These Allah will ignore.

 

[HisArpy]

You're the one who yaps at my heels not being able to deal with an opinionated woman who doesn't agree with you.

I have no issues with opinionated women or disagreement.

I do have issues with liars who try to FORCE their beliefs onto others.

See the difference?

 

[HisArpy]

These Allah will ignore.

I have an internal memo which says that Mr. MorningStar doesn't give a shit about this guy either.

Which only leaves that other guy and I think he's at book signing or something.

 

[adrina]

Kamala Harris is more trusted than Donald Trump on the US economy​

FT Michigan Ross poll shows Democratic candidate leading on the issue for first time in nearly a year

More Americans trust Kamala Harris to handle the US economy than Donald Trump, according to a new poll that marks a sharp change in voter sentiment following President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the White House race.

The survey, conducted for the Financial Times and the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, is the first monthly poll to show the Democratic presidential candidate leading Trump on the economy since it began tracking voter sentiment on the issue nearly a year ago.

Although 41 per cent of Americans still trust the former president more on economic issues — unchanged from the two previous monthly polls — the survey found 42 per cent of voters believe Harris would be better at handling the economy. That is a 7 percentage point increase compared to Biden’s numbers last month.

https://www.ft.com/content/cf9a7c4d-3b82-4867-892c-f4f95daebbc7

 

[Sparky74]

Kamala Harris is more trusted than Donald Trump on the US economy​

FT Michigan Ross poll shows Democratic candidate leading on the issue for first time in nearly a year

More Americans trust Kamala Harris to handle the US economy than Donald Trump, according to a new poll that marks a sharp change in voter sentiment following President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the White House race.

The survey, conducted for the Financial Times and the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, is the first monthly poll to show the Democratic presidential candidate leading Trump on the economy since it began tracking voter sentiment on the issue nearly a year ago.

Although 41 per cent of Americans still trust the former president more on economic issues — unchanged from the two previous monthly polls — the survey found 42 per cent of voters believe Harris would be better at handling the economy. That is a 7 percentage point increase compared to Biden’s numbers last month.

https://www.ft.com/content/cf9a7c4d-3b82-4867-892c-f4f95daebbc7

So True and so so Right!!!!!

 

[HisArpy]

Kamala Harris is more trusted than Donald Trump on the US economy​

FT Michigan Ross poll shows Democratic candidate leading on the issue for first time in nearly a year

More Americans trust Kamala Harris to handle the US economy than Donald Trump, according to a new poll that marks a sharp change in voter sentiment following President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the White House race.

The survey, conducted for the Financial Times and the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, is the first monthly poll to show the Democratic presidential candidate leading Trump on the economy since it began tracking voter sentiment on the issue nearly a year ago.

Although 41 per cent of Americans still trust the former president more on economic issues — unchanged from the two previous monthly polls — the survey found 42 per cent of voters believe Harris would be better at handling the economy. That is a 7 percentage point increase compared to Biden’s numbers last month.

https://www.ft.com/content/cf9a7c4d-3b82-4867-892c-f4f95daebbc7

An article I read the other day on the current polling analyzed the hows and why there's been such a dramatic uptick. The conclusion is that the polls are miniscule in size and oversampled the liberal and democratic responses without compensating for it. This becomes apparent in the crosstabs of the polls.

It's also apparent when examining what's happened. Kamala was polling in the mid 20's only a month ago. Now she's polling in the high 40's. Joe dropping out and anointing her his replacement cannot be responsible for the drastic change in voter confidence. Maybe some uptick sure, but not a doubling of overall job approval because she's done NOTHING in that area to change anything.

So, we should be taking the polls which show her leading with an even larger grain of salt than usual.

 

[ll74]

I don't trust either on the economy. I think we need a new fed chair yesterday.

 

[subdudeme13]

Kamala Harris is more trusted than Donald Trump on the US economy​

FT Michigan Ross poll shows Democratic candidate leading on the issue for first time in nearly a year

More Americans trust Kamala Harris to handle the US economy than Donald Trump, according to a new poll that marks a sharp change in voter sentiment following President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the White House race.

The survey, conducted for the Financial Times and the University of Michigan Ross School of Business, is the first monthly poll to show the Democratic presidential candidate leading Trump on the economy since it began tracking voter sentiment on the issue nearly a year ago.

Although 41 per cent of Americans still trust the former president more on economic issues — unchanged from the two previous monthly polls — the survey found 42 per cent of voters believe Harris would be better at handling the economy. That is a 7 percentage point increase compared to Biden’s numbers last month.

https://www.ft.com/content/cf9a7c4d-3b82-4867-892c-f4f95daebbc7

The idea that anyone would trust Trump on any subject is beyond my comprehension.

 

[Sparky74]

The idea that anyone would trust Trump on any subject is beyond my comprehension.

Completely agree

 

[dmallord]

I SAID



So your fuckup in not comprehending plain and simple words is all on you.

And of course you don't seem to remember that I live in California. I KNOW all about Kamala Harris, the method behind her rise to power, the fact that California voted her OUT of the State so she couldn't do any more damage to the people, etc. etc. etc. YOU, who lives elsewhere, don't know anything except the pap you've been fed to appease your TDS.

Finally, if I want to call her stupid names in the name of promoting political ideology, then I can. Just like you can call people "traitor" and make DonOLD memes. Unless it's (D)ifferent when )D)emocrats like you do it.

It's good to know where you stand on name-calling—any place, any time. As a lawyer, I thought you raised above that, but I see that is clarified now. I won't feel so bad if I slip down to your level hereafter.

You have an interesting perspective on her trajectory from Senator to VP. Is that California's way of removing candidates from the state and minimizing their potential impact on its citizens, giving them a higher position? What a proud moment you must have felt as that strategy eliminated a 'problem.'

Is this like moving Ronald Regan out of California to the White House? Is it the same idea?

 

[dmallord]

Yes, like his almost dying in a helicopter story.

: )

... with the wrong person... threatening to sue a reporter about it... failing to acknowledge that another person held up his hand waving, 'Hello, Donnie, it was you and I. You were the one crying over the danger to your life at the time! And no, we didn't almost die in that emergency landing–not even nearly a little bit.'

The stories and clips of his glitching memory are now on par with his prior nemesis. Orange Man turned red-faced and puffed up his cheeks while holding his breath in an attempt to draw attention, but failed again.

 

[dmallord]

He.

SHOWED.

UP.


Unlike Walz. Unlike Commie Kammi.

She
SHOWED
UP at daily rallies where vote counting is gained!

The 78-year-old convicted felon
SHOWED
UP at an impromptu blathering session for 90 minutes of lies again. No vote gain.

She
WILL NOT SHOW
UP for sentencing.

He
WILL SHOW
UP for sentencing.

SEE THE DIFFERENCE, lawyer?

 

[dmallord]

Trump is also campaigning, AND appearing in court, AND doing interviews, WHILE RECOVERING from an assassination attempt.


So the fact that Kamala isn't doing interviews, and hasn't been shot!, sort of indicates she's lacking, not excelling as you're trying to assert.

Better luck next time in your bullshit propaganda campaign.

Tell me again about Trump being busy with court appearances!

That's an intriguing topic! Is he testifying against a criminal... or is he being tried as one? [Big difference, right?] You know, a good businessman hires staff to keep him out of trouble with the law, not to hide from the law due to personal, willful violations of laws or morality, for that matter.

It is a matter of court record that his last appearances were convictions, civil and criminal. He has a few more cases to keep him busy with appearances if justice prevails.

Respectfully, a fellow out playing golf a day after he is nicked by a bullet is seemingly past recovery. Although, he has been somewhat subdued since a bullet nicked his ear. I imagine he gave that some serious thought for a few hours and perhaps reflected on his statements at the Elipse about letting his people pass the Mags because those with guns were not there to harm him. He sent them instead to the Capitol to halt a perceived illegitimate election. He thought himself their savior and found out that not all of them believed that.

What an awakening to know someone has thoughts of doing you grave harm. It never crossed his mind when it was Paul Pelosi that was hammered. He mocked the deadly event as well as giving his two cents worth on hanging Mike Pence. He isn't doing that now. So, I'm inclined to think he might have second thoughts about sprueing hateful rhetoric. [Nah, scratch that thought!]

Press conferences... the rally content addresses many of those questions. Why cry foul? Was there a question about helicopter crashes and why did it stir up a hornet's nest? [There wasn't a question on helicopters BTW. Trump brought that upon himself, drawing attention and attempting to inflate his self-esteem, playing off the 'hole in his ear' declaration when it was a scratch instead.

Armpit, you lack standing to bring this matter to the public. JMHO.

 

[icanhelp1]

Tell me again about Trump being busy with court appearances!

That's an intriguing topic! Is he testifying against a criminal... or is he being tried as one? [Big difference, right?] You know, a good businessman hires staff to keep him out of trouble with the law, not to hide from the law due to personal, willful violations of laws or morality, for that matter.

It is a matter of court record that his last appearances were convictions, civil and criminal. He has a few more cases to keep him busy with appearances if justice prevails.

Respectfully, a fellow out playing golf a day after he is nicked by a bullet is seemingly past recovery. Although, he has been somewhat subdued since a bullet nicked his ear. I imagine he gave that some serious thought for a few hours and perhaps reflected on his statements at the Elipse about letting his people pass the Mags because those with guns were not there to harm him. He sent them instead to the Capitol to halt a perceived illegitimate election. He thought himself their savior and found out that not all of them believed that.

What an awakening to know someone has thoughts of doing you grave harm. It never crossed his mind when it was Paul Pelosi that was hammered. He mocked the deadly event as well as giving his two cents worth on hanging Mike Pence. He isn't doing that now. So, I'm inclined to think he might have second thoughts about sprueing hateful rhetoric. [Nah, scratch that thought!]

Press conferences... the rally content addresses many of those questions. Why cry foul? Was there a question about helicopter crashes and why did it stir up a hornet's nest? [There wasn't a question on helicopters BTW. Trump brought that upon himself, drawing attention and attempting to inflate his self-esteem, playing off the 'hole in his ear' declaration when it was a scratch instead.

Armpit, you lack standing to bring this matter to the public. JMHO.

You should probably wait for the appellate results before bragging.

If I remember correctly Marchen still has not sentenced Trump and may not. Talk is Marchen might be embarrassed into recusing himself.

 

[dmallord]

You should probably wait for the appellate results before bragging.

If I remember correctly Marchen (sic) still has not sentenced Trump and may not. Talk is Marchen (sic) might be embarrassed into recusing himself.

My remarks are not about bragging, but about stating the facts and the potential outcomes. Not being involved in the case, I'm free to comment, as you are on the case as a private citizen, so waiting to comment is not necessary.

I'm pleased that Trump had a fair trial judged by his peers. However, the inevitable appeals and the heated debate over Presidential immunity in SCOTUS are factors that could significantly impact the case.

Trump's sentencing is scheduled for September 18/19th. However, the date or even trial evidence in the case could change the potential sentencing. As to New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan being embarrassed, I'm not aware of articles saying that. Do you have a reference? I'd like to read it.

 

[icanhelp1]

My remarks are not about bragging, but about stating the facts and the potential outcomes. Not being involved in the case, I'm free to comment, as you are on the case as a private citizen, so waiting to comment is not necessary.

I'm pleased that Trump had a fair trial judged by his peers. However, the inevitable appeals and the heated debate over Presidential immunity in SCOTUS are factors that could significantly impact the case.

Trump's sentencing is scheduled for September 18/19th. However, the date or even trial evidence in the case could change the potential sentencing. As to New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan being embarrassed, I'm not aware of articles saying that. Do you have a reference? I'd like to read it.

There’s nothing fair about a misinformed misguided jury.

 

[dmallord]

There’s nothing fair about a misinformed misguided jury.

That's your preconceived opinion I suppose. Perhaps it has some basis, but the case judge who has oversight of that apparently would not agree with you. The justice system is not perfect, yet we trust it to render justice. Irony right?

Let the upper-level courts have a swing at it. Personally, I think the jury was informed by watching and listening to the presentations. The evidence seemed compelling, even getting it secondhand via the newscasters' relays. [I hope all trials of such national attention will be available for live viewing.]

If the jury was misguided by instructions, that might be another matter. I have no dog in that fight. Time and more appeals might find Trump guilty... or not.

 

[schism666]

Apostrophes do not denote plural.

They're acting...,

abuse of ellipses denotes ignorance.

 

[schism666]

Insecure Trump Lies, Claims Harris Crowd Was Manipulated With AI.

The former president has also falsely accused his opponents of paying people to attend their rallies

is donold ok?

 

[John_von_Neumann]

Apostrophes do not denote plural.

Great. So, when are you gonna teach that to Assmeal?

 

[schism666]

kamala stands no chance

 

[Pad_Foot]

So Democrats attending rallies are AI generated?? They have to be! Or how will Trump be able to use crowd sizes to question the election ???

Don’t believe your eyes!! Or other witnesses!!
Believe Trump!! And social media
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/11/trump-harris-rally-crowd-ai-conspiracy.html

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1822765083459748161