Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've had my doubts about her, but damn if the watering down of how crazy Trump is hasn't become downright reckless. The trouble for him is that every time he opens his mouth, and his detractors have been genius enough to simply let him expose himself, he just sinks deeper. I only hope that others see the peril before it's too late. This "sanewashing" term fits it to a tee, but thankfully, he's making it harder and harder to pull that off. Kamala's team hopefully keeps running videos of him in his own words on a loop. I am cautiously optimistic (I don't dare be incautiously so) that as more and more swing voters see him, the few who are still undecided, they'll be unable to deny the plain truth about his derangement and dementia. I don't like Swalwell much personally for reasons that are a long story, but his recent ads that portray Trump as a senile old man are gold. It wouldn't change my parents' minds, or my siblings', but there are those who are easier to convince.The double standard for Harris and Trump has reached a breaking point - One candidate can rant about gibberish while the other has to be perfect.
One candidate can rant about gibberish while the other has to be perfect.
Something is wrong with this split-screen picture. On one side, former president Donald Trump rants about mass deportations and claims to have stopped “wars with France,” after being described by his longest-serving White House chief of staff as a literal fascist. On the other side, commentators debate whether Vice President Kamala Harris performed well enough at a CNN town hall to “close the deal.”
Somehow, it is apparently baked into this campaign that Trump is allowed to talk and act like a complete lunatic while Harris has to be perfect in every way. I don’t know the answer to the chicken-or-egg question — whether media coverage is leading public perception or vice versa — but the disparate treatment is glaring.
This week, it became simply ridiculous.
During Wednesday’s town hall, CNN’s Anderson Cooper asked Harris whether she believes Trump is a fascist. “Yes, I do,” she replied — and that was the headline from the event. But news stories and commentary also questioned her decision to pivot from questions about specific policy positions — almost all of which she has already spelled out in considerable detail — to attacks on Trump and warnings about the danger he poses to our democracy.
Let’s review: First, Harris was criticized for not doing enough interviews — so she did multiple interviews, including with nontraditional media. She was criticized for not doing hostile interviews — so she went toe to toe with Bret Baier of Fox News. She was criticized as being comfortable only at scripted rallies — so she did unscripted events, such as the town hall on Wednesday. Along the way, she wiped the floor with Trump during their one televised debate.
Trump, meanwhile, stands before his MAGA crowds and spews nonstop lies, ominous threats, impossible promises and utter gibberish. His rhetoric is dismissed, or looked past, without first being interrogated.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/24/harris-trump-cnn-town-hall/
There's more. Never have I wanted to copy paste an entire article before but this is worth the read.
It is truly irrational. Trump could literally shit his pants on live TV and they would criticize Harris for not addressing an issue exactly perfectly.
Sucks fo rT Trump to lose another vote. How many did he need 8,7xx? Need to add aother one to his count, Arpy.No one fucking cares.
Please check in with your optometrist, clearly you are not seeing CLEARLY.I'm merely trying to point out to someone who appears to be both blind and stupid, that your desperate attempts to paint Trump poorly, aren't working.
Because no one fucking cares.
My adjectives are just fine, thank you for your inquiry.
Yet, here she stands, for all to see, as a full-fledged legal beagle and served successfully as DA in the biggest legal department of any state.Kamala Harris Got Into Law School Via a Program She Didn't Qualify For
By Jim Thompson | 7:45 AM on October 22, 2024
Kamala Harris graduated from Howard University without honors. Harris then applied to law school. She was admitted to Hastings School of Law at the University of California. Hastings is considered a good law school but not “elite." It ranks 80th of America’s ABA schools.
Admission isn't a "breeze" but it is pretty easy to be accepted for an honors student, with a solid LSAT. Of the total applicants to Hastings, about half are accepted and around a third of that number actually enroll. That means Hasting is a “backup” law school for a lot of the applicants.
She wasn't an honors student at Howard. There is no information on what Kamala Harris scored on her LSAT. We do know that she didn't pass the Bar on the first try when 80 percent of her classmates did pass. So how did a run-of-the-mill student, and daughter of a “privileged” upbringing get into Hastings School of Law?
Easy – she fudged her application. Harris was admitted under a program called LEOP. According to the University:
The rest here: https://redstate.com/jimthompson/20...sed-on-program-she-didnt-quality-for-n2180892
Harris is one big manufactured phoney.
THIS is your "October Surprise"?Kamala Harris graduated from Howard University without honors....
There is no information on what Kamala Harris scored on her LSAT.
Ask your Juris Doctor partner-in-slime HisArpy how many times it took him to pass the California bar exam.We do know that she didn't pass the Bar on the first try when 80 percent of her classmates
Yes. However, your comment is an attempt at deflection regarding the matter.You voted for a guy who was making fun of Trump's dick:
Barack Obama Makes Not-So-Subtle Dick Joke While Mocking Trump’s ‘Weird Obsession with Crowd Sizes’
Michael LucianoAug 20th, 2024, 11:30 pm
1948 comments
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/b...king-trumps-weird-obsession-with-crowd-sizes/
A lot to unpack here and although I want to jump at the opportunity to embarrass you yet again WHYDAFUK should I have to pull out my secret decoder ring to answer your stream of consciousness line of questioning?
^^^^^^^^
Putting in OT on the job, huh?
You work hard for the money
![]()
Which specific polls are sampling more Democrats than Republicans? Based on what methodology?More here: https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/24/msnbc-steve-kornacki-kamala-harris-popularity-2024-election/
And we all know these polls are sampling more Democrats than Republicans.
This is why not.I'm merely trying to point out to someone who appears to be both blind and stupid, that your desperate attempts to paint Trump poorly, aren't working.
Because no one fucking cares.
The Democrat methodology called "bullshit the American people."Which specific polls are sampling more Democrats than Republicans? Based on what methodology?
You don't know because you're literally making up shit. You saw one person say that and you repeat it as if you know anything about polling.
That didn't answer the questionThe Democrat methodology called "bullshit the American people."
You are now being extremely brain-dead. Even for you.The Democrat methodology called "bullshit the American people."
Even Axelrod agrees!The Democrat methodology called "bullshit the American people."
45 rambles on incoherently for over an hour.