Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Israel has a Supreme Court for now, but American billionaires are spending considerable amounts of cash to dissolve the institution, making the Israeli Prime Minister position essentially a "Prime Minister for life".The Supreme Court shouldn't exist at all and anyone ever associated with it needs to be shot. It's a stupid institution and nothing at all like it exists anywhere else on the planet.
Does their Supreme Court consist of a special caste of work-allergic priestlings who dedicate their lives to pouring over the words of long-dead, genocidal slave-owning barbarians and conveniently twisting them into whatever will best serve the interests of the current ruling elite?Israel has a Supreme Court for now, but American billionaires are spending considerable amounts of cash to dissolve the institution, making the Israeli Prime Minister position essentially a "Prime Minister for life".
Should be a requirement or else we get Third World commies.Future candidates for the Supreme Court should be grilled for their views on the importance of "precedent" (or lack of importance).
Also, membership in the Federalist Society should be an automatic disqualification for consideration.
Hey Rob, speaking of billionairesIsrael has a Supreme Court for now, but American billionaires are spending considerable amounts of cash to dissolve the institution, making the Israeli Prime Minister position essentially a "Prime Minister for life".
Every country in Western Europe has a Supreme Court - meaning the highest court of appeal - different name and different jurisdiction doesn’t mean that such courts don’t exist even if you haven’t gone to the trouble of looking it upThe Supreme Court shouldn't exist at all and anyone ever associated with it needs to be shot. It's a stupid institution and nothing at all like it exists anywhere else on the planet.
For 246 years, "Stare Decisis" ("that what has been decided") has been a cornerstone of the United States Supreme Court. Once conservatives got their 6-3 majority, they threw that 246 year custom out the window and began "legislating from the bench", essentially co-opting the legislative branch.None of the justices made any promises to rule a certain way on any matter on any future cases. They were all confirmed by the Senate.
I get it. You don’t like SCOTUS. None of the justices promised anything to anyone on decisions pertaining to future cases. They were all confirmed by the Senate.For 246 years, "Stare Decisis" ("that what has been decided") has been a cornerstone of the United States Supreme Court. Once conservatives got their 6-3 majority, they threw that 246 year custom out the window and began "legislating from the bench", essentially co-opting the legislative branch.
Alito is the prime culprit here, he has voted against Stare Decesis more than any other Supreme Court "justice" in the history of the organization. He hates America
You are technically correct, which is the best kind of correct. The Senate got complacent after 240 years, they did NOT ask about the candidates about how they felt about precedent. ALL of the justices confirmed in this century paid lip service to precedent when asked about Roe v. Wade. "That has already been decided, I see no need to comment on that".I get it. You don’t like SCOTUS. None of the justices promised anything to anyone on decisions pertaining to future cases. They were all confirmed by the Senate.
It’s not a technicality.You are technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.