Just so you know it: Women rule the world

Liar

now with 17% more class
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Posts
43,715
Behind the tired old "I want my power back" whining and the fact that he draws some really odd conclusions, there are some interresting observations to this guy's statements. He's a populist dud and if not a misogynist, at least conservative on the verge of inertia fetishism.

The highlighted lines still made me think "yep..."

Post-industrialism IS one of the biggest shifts in society and the human mind since we fell off the branches. And it clearly favors social networking over physical competition, hermeneutic reasoning and patience over absolutism and brute force...even power hierarchies centering around one strong leader (the alpha male) are beginning to feel old.

Women does not rule the world, that pendulum has way to go before it's swung even half way, whatever Buerk says. But the way the world look, the traits that tradition have bestowed upon women, the same traits that have kept them away from power, are what now make them apt rulers.

Which is fine by me. I don't want power over anything but my private life. If that means my boss has boobs or balls, I couldn't care less.

----------------------------

Women rule the world

LONDON: A British newsreader has launched an extraordinary attack on women bosses, claiming the "shift in the balance of power between the sexes" has gone too far and "life is now lived in accordance with women's rules".

The BBC's Michael Buerk has cited females in the top jobs at the broadcasting giant as an example, saying "these are the people who decide what we see and hear".

Mr Buerk, who complains that men have been reduced to "sperm donors", told Britain's Radio Times magazine that society needed to admit there was a problem.

"Life is now being lived in accordance to women's rules," he said.

"The traits that have traditionally been associated with men – reticence, stoicism, single-mindedness – have been marginalised.


"The result is that men are becoming more like women. Look at the men who are being held up as sporting icons – David Beckham and, God forbid, Tim Henman."

He said all people had to do was look at the changes in the workplace.

"There is no manufacturing industry any more; there are no mines and few vital jobs require physical strength."

"What we have now are lots of jobs that require people skills and multi-tasking, which women are a lot better at."


The former Nine O'Clock News newsreader, who now reads the news on BBC World, said some changes had been for the good, but asked: "What are the men left with?

"Men gauge themselves in terms of their career, but many of those have disappeared.

"All they are is sperm donors, and most women aren't going to want an unemployable sperm donor loafing around and making the house look untidy. They are choosing not to have a male in the household.

Products were now made for women, including cars because women control what is being bought, he said.

"Some people might argue that this is a case of the pendulum swinging over the woman's side for a change, and eventually it will find a happy medium.

"I'm not so sure about that," he said.
 
Women rule the world


"In less enlightened times, the best way to impress women was to own a hot car. But women wised up and realized it was better to buy their own hot cars so they wouldn't have to ride around with jerks. "-Scott Adams
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Liar said:
Post-industrialism IS one of the biggest shifts in society and the human mind since we fell off the branches. And it clearly favors social networking over physical competition, hermeneutic reasoning and patience over absolutism and brute force...even power hierarchies centering around one strong leader (the alpha male) are beginning to feel old.

I'm really screwed then.

My ability at social networking is even worse than my ability at physical competition.

I have no idea what hermeneutic reasoning is and I have the patience of a six year old.

Can't stand absolutists and I'm no good at brute force.

Oh well. I'm used to being an outsider.
 
I can't really comment on society in England. I can assume, but that isn't relly fair, so maybe he's making a fair point that is more notable in British society. Over here, however, I think things aren't quite looking the same way he described. Are cars and other things being designed with women in mind? Yes, but considering nearly everything was designed for men until then, and those things are still being produced...?

What got me about this whole thing is the simple statement:

"All they are is sperm donors, and most women aren't going to want an unemployable sperm donor loafing around and making the house look untidy. They are choosing not to have a male in the household."

The way to avoid this whole thing, is to accept whatever job you can get, which over here is currently what women and men are both doing (moreso women, in my understanding -- at least locally, though it is fairly conservative, or so I hope -- given the difficulty in being a mother and working, as in time off for maternity and the dependence of children on their mother when very young), and clean the house instead of sitting around watching television, especially if you can't find one of those chatever-I-can-get jobs.

Just my way of thinking.

Q_C
 
I really can't agree that women rule the world. Until I figured out how to become gainfully self employed, I worked for any number of men, women and "can't tell." The clear and easily identifiable trait that my bosses had was incompetence. The trait cut right across gender, religious, national origin and age groups.

IMNTHO, the incompetent rule the world.
 
R. Richard said:
I really can't agree that women rule the world. Until I figured out how to become gainfully self employed, I worked for any number of men, women and "can't tell." The clear and easily identifiable trait that my bosses had was incompetence. The trait cut right across gender, religious, national origin and age groups.

IMNTHO, the incompetent rule the world.

Nicely worded...

Q_C
 
R. Richard said:
IMNTHO, the incompetent rule the world.
Ever heard of the term "Level Of Incompetence".

It's where people's career ladders end, which is, at a position that requires things they are not competent to handle. This can be either because you get more and more demanding tasks within your field of expertise, but most often because the new position requres different skills. It doesn't take people skills to be an engineer, but to manage a team of them, definitely. You rise to your level of incompetence, and then you get stuck there, doing a poor job, and the people under you thinks the boss is an idiot. And they're right.

So yah, the incompetent rule the world.
 
Quiet_Cool said:
I can't really comment on society in England. I can assume, but that isn't relly fair, so maybe he's making a fair point that is more notable in British society. Over here, however, I think things aren't quite looking the same way he described. Are cars and other things being designed with women in mind? Yes, but considering nearly everything was designed for men until then, and those things are still being produced...?

What got me about this whole thing is the simple statement:

"All they are is sperm donors, and most women aren't going to want an unemployable sperm donor loafing around and making the house look untidy. They are choosing not to have a male in the household."

The way to avoid this whole thing, is to accept whatever job you can get, which over here is currently what women and men are both doing (moreso women, in my understanding -- at least locally, though it is fairly conservative, or so I hope -- given the difficulty in being a mother and working, as in time off for maternity and the dependence of children on their mother when very young), and clean the house instead of sitting around watching television, especially if you can't find one of those chatever-I-can-get jobs.

Just my way of thinking.

Q_C
Uh... just for the record... you did read the part where I said that the guy was a doofus and that it was only two small snippets of ephiphany in his drivel that was worth considering? The one you quoted being a part of the drivel.

#L
 
As far as I know, men and women are both of the same species, so I don't see what the big fuss is about.

I mean, it's not like gerbils are taking over the world.

--Zoot
 
dr_mabeuse said:
As far as I know, men and women are both of the same species, so I don't see what the big fuss is about.

I mean, it's not like gerbils are taking over the world.

--Zoot
Now, there's a movie script to pitch.
 
Liar said:
Uh... just for the record... you did read the part where I said that the guy was a doofus and that it was only two small snippets of ephiphany in his drivel that was worth considering? The one you quoted being a part of the drivel.

#L
My comment was aimed at the article in general, not your commentary on it, Liar.

Q_C
 
I'm thinking they can have it. I'm just around for the beer, the food and the sex...
 
dr_mabeuse said:
As far as I know, men and women are both of the same species, so I don't see what the big fuss is about.

I mean, it's not like gerbils are taking over the world.

--Zoot

Oh, they're not? You believe that?

Such fools. The rodents have all banned together, planning their next strike. It was, in fact, the gerbils that landed the first shocking blow years ago, and have continued thier assault.

Time and time again, they've invaded. And we all know where don't we?

Yeah, that's right...

Richard Gere's ass!

*ahem*

Q_C
 
Back
Top