Desiremakesmeweak
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Posts
- 2,060
I spent a lot of years looking at, borrowing from libraries, and even buying books by Harold Robbins, and, I recall the Daily Mirror and other journals and magazines would have him beside a Jensen Interceptor or a Corvette or something, and spruiking about his latest smash global betseller.
A friend of mine who was a significant (genius, really) architect and designer, and who specialised in very expensive hardwood furniture, had this manuscript he was working on the whole of his life (that he never finished as far as I know), which he claimed was along the lines of a Robbins novel. He would wax lyrical about the genius of Robbins and tell me how women, particularly, read his books and got off from them. He was definitely impressed by Robbins' books.
I'm in two minds about Harold Robbins. He said in interviews that he considered himself the world's best writer in basic English - and I think that idea is admirable; I'm all for uncomplicated language in most cases.
Frankly, I personally consider propaganda also a valid form of fiction writing, and for me, Harold Robbins was all packaging and propaganda and virtually zero actual prose writing talent at all. Which means I still rate him 'up there' for what it's worth, though not as a writer of novels. And I don't mean to be deprecating about it, really. His titles and storylines were turned into reasonable films perhaps because 'log lines' make movies in many cases.
What is your view?
A friend of mine who was a significant (genius, really) architect and designer, and who specialised in very expensive hardwood furniture, had this manuscript he was working on the whole of his life (that he never finished as far as I know), which he claimed was along the lines of a Robbins novel. He would wax lyrical about the genius of Robbins and tell me how women, particularly, read his books and got off from them. He was definitely impressed by Robbins' books.
I'm in two minds about Harold Robbins. He said in interviews that he considered himself the world's best writer in basic English - and I think that idea is admirable; I'm all for uncomplicated language in most cases.
Frankly, I personally consider propaganda also a valid form of fiction writing, and for me, Harold Robbins was all packaging and propaganda and virtually zero actual prose writing talent at all. Which means I still rate him 'up there' for what it's worth, though not as a writer of novels. And I don't mean to be deprecating about it, really. His titles and storylines were turned into reasonable films perhaps because 'log lines' make movies in many cases.
What is your view?