John Kerry admits: The SwiftBoat guys spoke the truth!

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
About time he admitted it

and

when will he release ALL his military files

AS HE PROMISED TO DO 3 YEARS AGO?????????????????
 
Poor busybody. Still trying to steal the last election. tch tch tch

Hey busybody, I hear that John F. Kennedy sleeps around. You should look into that.
 
Loser

You and your Boy Kerry....................

Didnt you PROMISE to LEAVE forever if Kerry lost?


Now the turd ADMITS the Swifties told the truth

AND

HE STILL DIDNT RELEASE ALL THE RECORDS

LOSER!
 
The Mutt said:
Poor busybody. Still trying to steal the last election. tch tch tch

Hey busybody, I hear that John F. Kennedy sleeps around. You should look into that.
Poor Mutso

On the side that CANT win anything without SHITTING and SHOUTING!
 
Hi Busy,

Libby, Rumsfeld, Gonzales all are gone. Are you thinking what I'm thinking? We bring back the Stooges!

You can be Shemp.
 
And so we get Bush (again) as President. Now there was a Deal. Now you will get Hillary. I'm going to wet myself laughing at you freaking out for four years.
 
Saint Boner said:
And so we get Bush (again) as President. Now there was a Deal. Now you will get Hillary. I'm going to wet myself laughing at you freaking out for four years.
that is NOT the point

after Kerry made a BIG DEAL about the Swfties and saying he will sue em etc

and


promising to release ALL his records

HE HASNT DONE ANY OF EM

and now he admits they were telling the truth!
 
vetteman said:
Hahahaha, the biggest fun will be watching your smile turn into a frown by the time she leaves.
The only way she gets in the WH is if she brings a MOP to clean the place :cool:
 
I'm still waiting for some sort of link to this admission.

I'm not holding my breath though.
 
busybody said:
The only way she gets in the WH is if she brings a MOP to clean the place :cool:

busybody believes that a woman's place is on-the-run trying to stay one step ahead of pervy stalkers. Or pregnant.
 
When the Swifties started in 04

Kerry said it was LIES and he would fight it with Court action, LIBEL suits

Plus

He would release ALL of his military records

Well, the ENTIRE military records have NOT be released

and now..............

Sen. Kerry permits last statute of limitations for defamation to lapse, forever barring any defamation claim against SwiftVet authors O'Neill and Corsi

A clear admission he KNOWS the truth, and the truth is with the SWIFTIES and NOT with him

When I first brought it to his attention in September 2005, I reminded Sen. John F. Kerry that — based on the publication date on or about August 25, 2004, of Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry by John E. O'Neill and Jerome R. Corsi — Sen. Kerry had already allowed the one-year statutes of limitations for defamation to expire in Texas (where Mr. O'Neill resides), New Jersey (where Dr. Corsi resides), and the District of Columbia (where their publisher Regnery Publishing, Inc. has its principal place of business and Sen. Kerry has his own regular place of business).

But as I noted then, Sen. Kerry's home state of Massachusetts has a very unusual, extremely generous and pro-plaintiff three-year limitations period for defamation claims. Massachusetts' three-year statute of limitations for defamation claims made it the very last feasible venue in which Sen. Kerry conceivably could file suit and gain his public vindication, if the SwiftVets' allegations about him were false. Those claims were certainly, indeed deliberately, injurious to his reputation; his damages arguably include the loss of the 2004 presidential election, however that might be valued in dollars and cents; and if John Kerry could hope to find a home-town advantage anywhere, surely it would be there. But now he's let the incredibly generous Massachusetts statute of limitations run out, too.

In my 2005 post, I offered this free and helpful legal advice to Sen. Kerry (who may need it, since his own bar membership is still on inactive status):

Seriously, though, Senator, some folks might draw the inference that rather than your having just forgotten the one-year anniversary of the publication of Unfit for Command — oopsies! — you're instead desperately afraid to ever face cross-examination under oath, or [to face] document subpoenas of yourself and your hagiographer Doug Brinkley, or the rest of the brilliant spotlight that accompanies a public lawsuit. Folks might become more and more convinced that you've very deliberately let most state statutes of limitations expire already, and that you'll continue to allow the clock to run on any that haven't yet.

So let's drop the snark and call a spade a spade: The very last thing John Kerry wants is to ever give the SwiftVets the legal tools they'd need to conclusively document their claims, because truth is, of course, a complete defense to defamation claims. Kerry doesn't deserve vindication, and he knows he could never get it in court. In court, there would be compulsory discovery of witnesses and documents, followed by a fair and disciplined adversary process, followed by a definitive determination of the truth or falsity of the SwiftVets' charges — a determination that he damn well knows would go against him. Instead, the haze of time and the near-universal bluster of his mainstream media allies (who continue to insist that the SwiftVets' claims were "debunked" and that Kerry was victimized) has given him a far better result than he could ever get in court.

I'll tell ya what, though, Senator: On the off chance that I'm misreading what's behind your allowing limitations to lapse against O'Neill and Corsi, and you really intended to sue them but just, I dunno, forgot:

You have a standing offer from me: Just sue me here in Houston for defamation. After all, I've republished most of the SwiftVets' claims here on my blog, and I've made many of them again in my own voice. I use a pseudonym for my blog name, but it's not anonymous — my name and address are linked on every page of this blog, and have been since the day it started. I'll waive any statute of limitations defense. I'll waive service of process. Hell, I'll meet you at the federal courthouse doors for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (you have diversity jurisdiction), and I'll even pay your filing fee!

You think it will be too expensive to have big teams of lawyers? Fine — since you were once a big-time courtroom lawyer, let's just you and me tangle one-on-one, both of us pro se. (I'll agree not to oppose your application for admission pro hac vice to the federal court here in Texas, and I'll even pay the fees to get your law license reinstated in Massachusetts.) Just me at my table, you at yours, and then a set of jurors good and true in the jury box. (I may need a napkin, though, or maybe even a drool-bucket, because the very notion of going one-on-one with you in court is causing me to salivate.) Or, hell, you can have as many lawyers as you want, and I'll still go pro se. Go fetch David Boies, he might do it for free (unless he's already figured out what a loser your case would be). Whatever. As long as there's a judge who can make you shut up each time your turn is over and who'll then give me a fair turn, I'll be satisfied.

My one stipulation is: No confidentiality orders, and no motions to quash. Everything that's uncovered in pretrial discovery has to become part of the public record without delay. We'll put it all on the internet via a neutral host (say, the WaPo). We'll do the pretrial depos on video, too, and jointly move the court to permit TV coverage of the trial, so that the public (and the jury, eventually) can see who sweats under oath under the bright lights.

Doesn't that sound like fun, Senator? Gosh, it does to me.
 
Kerry could not have lacked for expert legal help.

His brother Cameron is a partner in Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, a 450 lawyer Boston firm, and specialist in litigation. Cameron Kerry seems devoted enough to his brother, according to this press account:


On Sept. 18, 1972, the evening before the primary election during his second attempt for Congress, Kerry's brother Cameron and one Thomas Vallely, both part of his current campaign team, were arrested by Lowell police at 1:40 a.m. and charged with breaking and entering with the intent to commit larceny. The two were apprehended in the basement of a building whose door had been forced open, police said. It housed the headquarters of candidate DiFruscia. The Watergate scandal was making headlines at this time, and it was called the Lowell Watergate.


"They wanted to sever my telephone lines," DiFruscia said recently. Had those lines been cut, Kerry's opponent would not have been able to telephone supporters on Election Day to get out the vote and coordinate poll watchers, vital roles in a close election. "I do not know if they wanted to break into my office," says DiFruscia today. At the time he said, "All my IBM cards and the list of my voter identification in the greater Lowell area are in my headquarters."


Cameron and Vallely, along with David Thorne, who was Kerry's campaign manager at the time and has been close to him since they attended Yale together, did not deny the two entered the building in which they were captured. They said at the time they were in the cellar of the building to check their own telephone lines because they had received an anonymous call warning they would be cut.
 
Why this thread BB?

Yeah, I know that Kerry never released his military records as promised. And I know he never brought suit as threatened.

But Kerry's as politically dead as a possum trying to cross I-10. Soooo, why this thread?

Ishmael
 
busybody said:
About time he admitted it

and

when will he release ALL his military files

AS HE PROMISED TO DO 3 YEARS AGO?????????????????
Again, Kerry went to Vietnam. Bush did not!! You might say, Kerry was in the bush, Bush was into drinking and cocain usage....
 
I guess then you are saying that someone who DIDNT serve runs against someone who did

the SERVER should prevail

????????????????????



(your assertion is inaccurate and useless)
 
Back
Top