Reefkeeper
Virgin
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2008
- Posts
- 21
I recently had a story rejected. It was to have been the third installment in the "Jennifer Tests Her Wings" series.
As you all may be aware the rejection doesn't go into much detail but it said something to the effect "Was there sexual contact with an underaged person?".
I reviewed the story and the answer was 'No!' There was no such contact. The only things which might be construed in that light are:
1. The wife in a happily married couple mentioned that their over 18 daughter contrived a situation years ago which resulted in the husband accidentally walking in on her teenaged girlfriend as she was emerging from the shower. It totally embarrassed him and he fled the room immediately.
2. The two girls sneaked around the outside of the house and once peeked through a window to watch her father masturbate (alone).
3. The two parents were doing the dishes and the wife laughingly commented that the friend of their daughter's occasionally caused him to get a "woody".
All the characters were over 18 and there was never any allusion to, suggestion of, or intimation made that there was any attempt at contact by any of the parties in years past.
Could the reviewer have made a mistake or did I commit some faux pas?
As you all may be aware the rejection doesn't go into much detail but it said something to the effect "Was there sexual contact with an underaged person?".
I reviewed the story and the answer was 'No!' There was no such contact. The only things which might be construed in that light are:
1. The wife in a happily married couple mentioned that their over 18 daughter contrived a situation years ago which resulted in the husband accidentally walking in on her teenaged girlfriend as she was emerging from the shower. It totally embarrassed him and he fled the room immediately.
2. The two girls sneaked around the outside of the house and once peeked through a window to watch her father masturbate (alone).
3. The two parents were doing the dishes and the wife laughingly commented that the friend of their daughter's occasionally caused him to get a "woody".
All the characters were over 18 and there was never any allusion to, suggestion of, or intimation made that there was any attempt at contact by any of the parties in years past.
Could the reviewer have made a mistake or did I commit some faux pas?