It's "Twitter Freedom Friday!"

This is especially funny because there is zero triggering and even if there was, it would have nothing to do with anything you did.

You're stealing credit from something that hasn't happened, 🤡.

Your post was 100% triggering just like all the other Elon hate posts.

You're not only delusional but also totally lacking any self awareness.

Now rage at Elon some more while claiming not to be triggered LOL :D
 
Says the guy who was quoted saying what now claims he didn’t.

Where?

I never once claimed Twitter was a public service, your lies notwithstanding of course. Nor have I ever 'backpedaled' from my position that they are a private company an can do whatever the fuck they want.

You're just a liar.
 
Where?

I never once claimed Twitter was a public service, your lies notwithstanding of course. Nor have I ever 'backpedaled' from my position that they are a private company an can do whatever the fuck they want.

You're just a liar.
Again, where I quoted you saying it.
 
You got banned again? Seriously dude...up your meds or seek some help
 
Your post was 100% triggering just like all the other Elon hate posts.

You're not only delusional but also totally lacking any self awareness.

Now rage at Elon some more while claiming not to be triggered LOL :D
I guess if you're a spineless turd you would see my funny posts about Elon the soyboy as being hateful and triggered.
 
Liberal fearmongering ought to be an oxymoron. Fog of oxycodone, I guess.
 
It's fine. Musk can rely on Saudi Arabia for their cash.
 
I guess if you're a spineless turd you would see my funny posts about Elon the soyboy as being hateful and triggered.

Your posts are funny because the leftoid meltdown over free speech on Twitter is funny.

That you call Elon a soyboy is just more demonstration of triggering.

The hat is of free speech. "progressive" leftoids absolutely can't stand it.
 
Your posts are funny because the leftoid meltdown over free speech on Twitter is funny.

That you call Elon a soyboy is just more demonstration of triggering.

The hat is of free speech. "progressive" leftoids absolutely can't stand it.
LOL! Again, which one is it? Is this a freedom of speech issue or is Twitter a private business. You keep saying it’s both and it can’t be.
 
LOL! Again, which one is it? Is this a freedom of speech issue or is Twitter a private business. You keep saying it’s both and it can’t be.

Of course it can be both.

What stops a private company from being for or against free speech??

Nothing.

It can't be a 1A issue... but we're talking about free speech, not 1A legal issues.

I notice you STILL haven't pointed out a single place where I claimed Twitter was a public service and not a private company..... you're full of shit and a complete liar.


What am I not right about??

SGT is making the same mistake you made, conflating free speech with 1A protections/limitations of it.

Free speech and it's legal protections/limits are separate things. Basic liberalism, not shocking you two authoritarians can't understand that.
 
Last edited:
Of course it can be both.

What stops a private company from being for or against free speech??

Nothing.

It can't be a 1A issue... but we're talking about free speech, not 1A legal issues.

I notice you STILL haven't pointed out a single place where I claimed Twitter was a public service and not a private company..... you're full of shit and a complete liar.



What am I not right about??

SGT is making the same mistake you made, conflating free speech with 1A protections/limitations of it.

Free speech and it's legal protections/limits are separate things. Basic liberalism, not shocking you two authoritarians can't understand that.
It’s been provided. You having a meltdown over what you were quoted saying doesn’t change facts.

Since Twitter is a private company it’s up to Twitter. So again, how is that an issue here?

The issue here is that you’re making up your own individual definition of free speech and then you move the goalposts and backpedal.
 
It’s been provided. You having a meltdown over what you were quoted saying doesn’t change facts.

Since Twitter is a private company it’s up to Twitter. So again, how is that an issue here?

The issue here is that you’re making up your own individual definition of free speech and then you move the goalposts and backpedal.

No, it hasn't, repeating that lie more doesn't make it more true.

Yes, it is a private company as I've always said it was despite your bold faced lies otherwise.

It's an issue because being anti-American scum like pro-censorship leftoid Democrats is an issue for people who don't hate the USA.

No, I'm not making up anything, free speech is just that.... free speech. Has nothing to do with 1A.

The only person making up their own definitions to move post and backpedal is you as your last line is a total projection.
 
When the argument is reduced to who has the last word, it's just best to stop.

But please, continue
 
Yes, it's all him last word guy. 👍

All I did was ask him to back up his lies and watch him squirm around with his 3rd grade understanding of civil rights as he failed horribly to do so.

Stay upset I was picking on your boyfriend though. It's cute :D
 
Well he was the one going for the last word as if it made his lies and dishonest goalpost moving somehow vanish.

All I did was press him to back up his lies and explain the stupidity of conflating 1A protections of free speech with free speech itself and watchin him squirm around.
You're doing a good job proving it was him. Keep fighting the good fight 👍
 
Back
Top