It's shit your pants in terror time, libs, AR15 death toll released

OldJourno

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Posts
6,300
The FBI released its Uniform Crime Report for 2018 on Monday.
Notably, the number of homicides decreased significantly — by 7%. What may be even more surprising is that murders committed with firearms fell by 6.7%. And of those murders committed with a firearm, only 2.8% were with a rifle (this includes AR-type rifles), for a total of 297. Rifles were used less often to commit murder than knives, fists, and blunt objects. The overall steady decrease in violent crime has coincided with a steady increase in the number of firearms sold and owned.

WTF? That jerkoff Beto is talking about trashing the 2nd Amendment and confiscating scary-looking rifles that are responsible for a tiny fraction of the violent deaths in the U.S. annually. And a good portion of you half-wits just nod and go along with the program.
 
What else could you possibly expect from a population that believed GI Joe was a menace to society?
 
Rifle is the way to go and a .223 is a nice round but I've always been the long distance, large round sorta dude. .300 or 30-06 maybe. Some like the .308 and it's fine. Personal taste.
Distance is best over 400 yards or so. Merciful cuz they never even hear the shot and it's a good distance to be away so when folks start looking they won't find much in the way of witnesses cuz who's gonna remember a random dude a quarter mile away from a shooting? Nobody. And you're way long gone by the time anyone important shows up.
 
Didn't i read somewhere that Trump used foreign aid as leverage to have the Ukraine do his opposition research for him in the upcoming wlection?

That seems like a strange way to use tax payer money intended to halt Russian aggression.
 
Deplorables and their desperate, fuzzy math...lol. :cool:
 
As an addendum here. The laws being proposed by the anti-gunners go FAR beyond any AR type firearm with the ultimate goal of essentially disarming the populace entirely. Facts mean absolutely nothing to those folks.
 
Nobody has died from nuclear bombs in decades. So why shouldn’t Iran and North Korea have some?
 
Oh gosh; how very clever. Nobody's ever tried that reductio ad absurdum, before!
 
I really doubt that the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to own WMD’s. I could be wrong.
 
I believe muzzle loading cannon are fine.

I'd like a nice brass nine pounder.
 
Nobody has died from nuclear bombs in decades. So why shouldn’t Iran and North Korea have some?

http://i.imgur.com/YAGpXPd.png

I believe muzzle loading cannon are fine.

I'd like a nice brass nine pounder.

I miss arquebuses and matchlocks, myself.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a8/92/ec/a892ec06b1ddfb26e01a50991bab3464.jpg

http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/attachment.php?attachmentid=121599&stc=1

oh, there was an art to using those, my friend! Especially in the rain! :D
 
I’m sure that Kim Jong-un only wants nuclear missiles for occasional target practice.
 
No surprise that the snarkiest jingoists on the board think that is clever argument.

It's as relevant as arguing that the the First Amendment doesn't mean that you can use it as a defense while committing fraud.

Nukes are not in common usage. Rifles are.
 
Back
Top