Its Deja-Vu all over again! (The usual BUSYBODY shit is in here)

busybody..

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2002
Posts
149,503
Much has been made of the "fact" that we "must" get the permission of France and Germany to protect ourselves......


Speaking of Germany, Thomas Sowell notes the parallels between post-World War I efforts to disarm that country and the Iraqi "disarmament" regime today:

..............Back in the 1930s, Germany's military forces were limited by a ban on conscription, by limitations on the number and kinds of weapons it could have, and by a requirement that it station no troops in its own industrialized Rhineland. These requirements were in the treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War. . . .

Like Saddam Hussein today, Hitler at first pretended to go along with these restrictions, all the while clandestinely building up his military forces. However, this was clandestine only in the sense that the general public did not know about it. British intelligence was well aware of what he was doing and kept the Prime Minister informed.

When Hitler began openly violating the Versailles Treaty's restrictions, most notably by moving troops into the Rhineland, "France did nothing. It was the first of many nothings that France did in a series of crises that led up to World War II." ..........

As Sowell notes: "While history does not literally repeat itself, sometimes it comes very close."

The more things change, the more they remain the same!
 
With the current rate at which HeavyStick is sucking up at, I wouldn't be surprised if he comes here and agrees with every comment you've made.
 
busybody said:
Much has been made of the "fact" that we "must" get the permission of France and Germany to protect ourselves......


Speaking of Germany, Thomas Sowell notes the parallels between post-World War I efforts to disarm that country and the Iraqi "disarmament" regime today:

..............Back in the 1930s, Germany's military forces were limited by a ban on conscription, by limitations on the number and kinds of weapons it could have, and by a requirement that it station no troops in its own industrialized Rhineland. These requirements were in the treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War. . . .

Like Saddam Hussein today, Hitler at first pretended to go along with these restrictions, all the while clandestinely building up his military forces. However, this was clandestine only in the sense that the general public did not know about it. British intelligence was well aware of what he was doing and kept the Prime Minister informed.

When Hitler began openly violating the Versailles Treaty's restrictions, most notably by moving troops into the Rhineland, "France did nothing. It was the first of many nothings that France did in a series of crises that led up to World War II." ..........

As Sowell notes: "While history does not literally repeat itself, sometimes it comes very close."

The more things change, the more they remain the same!

Holy crap! You're right!
 
Re: Re: Its Deja-Vu all over again! (The usual BUSYBODY shit is in here)

Dixon Carter Lee said:
Holy crap! You're right!

DCL trying to use humour in order to camouflage his bully boy tactics.
 
busybody said:
Much has been made of the "fact" that we "must" get the permission of France and Germany to protect ourselves......

I really appreciate that you finally "accept" it.

*tongue OUT of cheek for the next line*

Better this kind of discussion than trying to argue with trolls.
 
Re: Re: Re: Its Deja-Vu all over again! (The usual BUSYBODY shit is in here)

busybody said:

Grins and humor in the title?

WTF?

C'mon... Busybody's on vacation, isn't he?
 
A Desert Rose said:
mmmmmm...mbb? You have a message pending, elsewhere.

I knew where the link was - I just got the one for today's article by mistake.
 
busybody said:
Now that is what I call......PRO-FOUND!!!! :confused: :confused: :confused:

At least I checked to make sure the damned thing worked. The first one was wrong.
 
Damn. You get lampooned, then come up with something that makes sense. WHAT THE HELL IS THE GB COMMING TO!!!

In point of fact, WWII is firmly rooted in the treaty of Versailles, in the kinds and magnitudes of limitations and reparations that were required of Germany. Much like the second gulf war may well be a direct result of the terms of surrender from the first gulf war. I think it can be easily argues that there was pretty high confidence that Sadam would refuse to abide by the terms of the cease fire when it was proposed.

This, of course, reppresents my own opinion. Any demands that I produce proof of my statements will be met with a blank stare. However, if anybody wants, I am fairly certain that these opinions can be substantiated in the opinions of others far more studied than I.
 
Carp

All my shit makes sense.....(usually).......But because BUSYBODY posts it.....

It is met with derision.....
 
Back
Top