It Was Only A Hotel Maid

R. Richard

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
10,382
If you're a politician with a big enough position, apparently you can convince yourself that you don't have to obey the law. This isn't the first time that the scumbag has been caught in a sexual predator situation. Those interested might follow the case to see how the scumbags let him squirm out of the situation this time. Comment?

IMF Head Strauss-Kahn Arrested for Sexual Attack

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the International Monetary Fund and French presidential hopeful, was arrested in New York today over accusations of a sexual attack on his hotel room maid, the New York Times reports. The attack allegedly occurred earlier today in the Times Square hotel where Strauss-Kahn was staying.

A 32-year-old woman told authorities that she entered Strauss-Kahn’s suite at the luxury Sofitel hotel not far from Manhattan’s Times Square at about 1 p.m. Eastern time (1600 GMT) Saturday and he attacked her, Browne said. She said she had been told to clean the spacious $3000-a-night-suite suite, which she had been told was empty.

According to an account the woman provided to police, Strauss-Kahn emerged from the bathroom naked, chased her down a hallway and pulled her into a bedroom, where he began to sexually assault her. She said she fought him off, then he dragged her into the bathroom, where he forced her to perform oral sex on him and tried to remove her underwear. The woman was able to break free again and escaped the room and told hotel staff what had happened, authorities said. They called police.

When New York City police detectives arrived moments later, Strauss-Kahn had already left the hotel, leaving behind his cellphone, Browne said. “It looked like he got out of there in a hurry,” Browne said.

Strauss-Kahn was taken off an Air France flight minutes before takeoff by officers from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and turned over to Manhattan detectives, according to a Port Authority spokesman. He is expected to be taken to the offices of the Manhattan Special Victims Unit at P.S.A. 5 in Manhattan, another official told the Times.

Strauss-Kahn, who is married to prominent French television journalist Anne Sinclair, had been considered a leading contender to run on the Socialist Party’s ticket against President Nicolas Sarkozy. Nonetheless, this is not his first exposure to controversy. In 2008, Strauss-Kahn was accused of having a sexual relationship with one of his subordinates, Piroska Nagy, a senior official in the IMF’s Africa Department. Nagy left the fund to work elsewhere, and despite an internal investigation, Strauss-Kahn kept his position at the IMF. The Times reports that he later apologized for an “error in judgment.”
 
Wow! Every man's secret fantasy becomes his real nightmare.

I'm just glad they caught the bastard.

Unbelievable, dumb pervert allowed his lust to get the better of him. Shame on him. It's better he's found out now, then later when he's running the country. Can you say Bill Clinton?

I did not have sex with that woman!

"Just wondering, uhm, any pictures? Videos?"
 
Last edited:
Without knowing any details of Strauss-Kahn's earlier situation-- there's an enormous difference between a "sexual relationship" and a violent rape.

And no, Freddie, nobody can say Bill Clinton compares to this guy.

Well, you can. But then you say anything and everything that pops into that gumball dispenser you call a head.
 
Without knowing any details of Strauss-Kahn's earlier situation-- there's an enormous difference between a "sexual relationship" and a violent rape.

And no, Freddie, nobody can say Bill Clinton compares to this guy.

Well, you can. But then you say anything and everything that pops into that gumball dispenser you call a head.

There is some comparison with Clinton, at least from what I have read. Some of his encounters, especially with Paula Jones, amounted to sexual harassment, and some of them probably amounted to sexual battery. Of course, he was nowhere near as bad as the assault described in the OP. :eek:

ETA: Here is a more recent article on him. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_...tary_fund_chief_to_plead_not_guilty_in_s.html
 
Last edited:
There is some comparison with Clinton, at least from what I have read. Some of his encounters, especially with Paula Jones, amounted to sexual harassment, and some of them probably amounted to sexual battery. Of course, he was nowhere near as bad as the assault described in the OP. :eek:
Oh, Box, PLEASE. Don't sink to Freddie's level! If you do, I'm gonna have to say: "Can you say Clarence Thomas"? Here's the Clinton/Jones case. Despicable as the behavior might be, "propositioning" the woman is not the same as assault or even battery.

Of course, this is what Freddie wants. To have us stop talking about the real assault and use it, instead, to dig up and vilify Clinton by comparing him to a rapist. Which is, frankly, reprehensible. Please spit out the political-bias bait, Box, and be the fair minded gentleman I know you can be. Stick to the topic, let us all stick to the topic, and let us not turn this into "which political party has more sexual sleezeballs who, even if they never tried to rape someone, did something that we can say is just like this even if it isn't?"

Does that not sound like a stupid thing to do rather than really discussing a real rapist and his victim? I've put Freddie on ignore. I hope others will as well. He's a boring and cliché GB troll.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101
There is some comparison with Clinton, at least from what I have read. Some of his encounters, especially with Paula Jones, amounted to sexual harassment, and some of them probably amounted to sexual battery. Of course, he was nowhere near as bad as the assault described in the OP.


Oh, Box, PLEASE. Don't sink to Freddie's level! If you do, I'm gonna have to say: "Can you say Clarence Thomas"? Here's the Clinton/Jones case. Despicable as the behavior might be, "propositioning" the woman is not the same as assault or even battery.

Of course, this is what Freddie wants. To have us stop talking about the real assault and use it, instead, to dig up and vilify Clinton by comparing him to a rapist. Which is, frankly, reprehensible. Please spit out the political-bias bait, Box, and be the fair minded gentleman I know you can be. Stick to the topic, let us all stick to the topic, and let us not turn this into "which political party has more sexual sleezeballs who, even if they never tried to rape someone, did something that we can say is just like this even if it isn't?"

Does that not sound like a stupid thing to do rather than really discussing a real rapist and his victim? I've put Freddie on ignore. I hope others will as well. He's a boring and cliché GB troll.

Under no circumstances would I sink to the level of Freddie but, at the same time, I would not say there was no comparison with Clinton, as Stella did. Strauss-Kahn is vastly worse, assuming he did what he is accused of doing, which appears to be the case. Even so, Clinton is no angel. Besides the Paula Jones case, he has been accused of unwanted fondling, which would constitute sexual battery, such as the case of Gennifer flowers and some others.

Comparing Thomas to Clinton is probably about the same as comparing Clinton to Strauss-Kahn, because I'm not sure CT did anything particularly wrong. To put it another way: SK is a mountain; Clinton is a hill and CT is an ant hill.

You're right, though. I have no problem castigating SK and leaving the others out of it. I think the SOB is still in jail, and I hope they keep him there. If he is granted bail, he is not just a risk, but a certainty to split, since he has nothing to keep him in the US, and has plenty of money and friends and associates to help him leave the country. If he runs off to France, he will be safe there, because they don't believe in honoring their extradition treaty with the US.

ETA:
Okay, my bad. I was thinking of Kathleen Willey, not Gennifer flowers, who was a willing participant. Here is another link, though, to another woman's claim. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/juanita.htm
 
Last edited:
Most mind blowing thing here to me is that with this guys money just get a damn high priced escort or garb a girl off of Craigs list. Did he think the odds of getting caught with a paid hooker were greater than a violent assault.

Honestly this is one of the few situations that I think someone's mistakes becoming viral and are sent all over the world is a good thing. I mean were not talking about something stupid here this is rape

This will certainly make it a bit harder for the scumbags to let this guy off Scott free. It will also say a lot about his wife to see if she tries to stay with this pariah

Part of me is wondering if part of the reason for his quick get away was that he was under some type of influence, won;t get him off the hook, but I would like to think he can't possibly be this fucking stupid.
 
Most mind blowing thing here to me is that with this guys money just get a damn high priced escort or garb a girl off of Craigs list. Did he think the odds of getting caught with a paid hooker were greater than a violent assault.

Honestly this is one of the few situations that I think someone's mistakes becoming viral and are sent all over the world is a good thing. I mean were not talking about something stupid here this is rape

This will certainly make it a bit harder for the scumbags to let this guy off Scott free. It will also say a lot about his wife to see if she tries to stay with this pariah

Part of me is wondering if part of the reason for his quick get away was that he was under some type of influence, won;t get him off the hook, but I would like to think he can't possibly be this fucking stupid.

He probably thought of the maid as being there to serve him in whatever way he wanted. There is a tendency among high-ranking European men to think of servants as being there to serve in the way the men want, and he might have felt he was within his rights to demand sexual favors. The title of this thread may be facetious, but it is also a common attitude among some people. Even now, he probably doesn't think he did anything wrong. :eek:
 
He probably thought of the maid as being there to serve him in whatever way he wanted. There is a tendency among high-ranking European men to think of servants as being there to serve in the way the men want, and he might have felt he was within his rights to demand sexual favors. The title of this thread may be facetious, but it is also a common attitude among some people. Even now, he probably doesn't think he did anything wrong. :eek:

I think you are right but he did this in our country and it's not like that here. Hopefully like I said the publicity forces them to heaven forbid charge him with a crime. Not that he won't get off or she won;t get paid off and mysteriously drop the charges (see Ben Rothlisberger on sex charges mysteriously vanishing)

I also think that someone should send this thread over to the non consent
section. Be a good plot bunny for the A-holes over there, they'll think he's a hero.
 
Oh, Box, PLEASE. Don't sink to Freddie's level! If you do, I'm gonna have to say: "Can you say Clarence Thomas"? Here's the Clinton/Jones case. Despicable as the behavior might be, "propositioning" the woman is not the same as assault or even battery.

Of course, this is what Freddie wants. To have us stop talking about the real assault and use it, instead, to dig up and vilify Clinton by comparing him to a rapist. Which is, frankly, reprehensible. Please spit out the political-bias bait, Box, and be the fair minded gentleman I know you can be. Stick to the topic, let us all stick to the topic, and let us not turn this into "which political party has more sexual sleezeballs who, even if they never tried to rape someone, did something that we can say is just like this even if it isn't?"

Does that not sound like a stupid thing to do rather than really discussing a real rapist and his victim? I've put Freddie on ignore. I hope others will as well. He's a boring and cliché GB troll.



Actually, you think too much of me. I was just making a funny comment. There was no other thought behind my post.

Thank you so much for putting me on ignore. Maybe for once I can make a post without being unjustly attacked.

"May a camel never shit on your head, let's hope anyway."

 
I think you are right but he did this in our country and it's not like that here. Hopefully like I said the publicity forces them to heaven forbid charge him with a crime. Not that he won't get off or she won;t get paid off and mysteriously drop the charges (see Ben Rothlisberger on sex charges mysteriously vanishing)

I also think that someone should send this thread over to the non consent
section. Be a good plot bunny for the A-holes over there, they'll think he's a hero.

Oh for Christ sakes. It's bad enough that Freddie makes this rape a political statement, now must you bring sports into the issue, too?

I shall put you on ignore from now on, that is, if I find out how to do that (lol).

If you ask me someone has had just a little too much caffeine today.

Actually, now that you mention it, Lovecraft, athletes are the primadonna darlings. They can get away with anything, including murder. Right, OJ?

I can't think of a superstar athlete who lives in the real world. Pampered from high school, they can do no wrong.

Gees, maybe I wrote too much. Now, everyone and anyone who has ever watched a baseball, basketball, football, or hockey game will put me on ignore because I dared write something bad about athletes.

"Forgive me, for I know not what I do? I thought I was just making a comment. I didn't know that everything that I write will be analyzed and slandered against me."

Now, why is that, I wonder? Why when I make any comment, there's someone shining a flashlight up my ass, before writing that he or she is putting me on ignore?

"Assholes!"




 
Oh for Christ sakes. It's bad enough that Freddie makes this rape a political statement, now must you bring sports into the issue, too?

I shall put you on ignore from now on, that is, if I find out how to do that (lol).

If you ask me someone has had just a little too much caffeine today.

Actually, now that you mention it, Lovecraft, athletes are the primadonna darlings. They can get away with anything, including murder. Right, OJ?

I can't think of a superstar athlete who lives in the real world. Pampered from high school, they can do no wrong.

Gees, maybe I wrote too much. Now, everyone and anyone who has ever watched a baseball, basketball, football, or hockey game will put me on ignore because I dared write something bad about athletes.

"Forgive me, for I know not what I do? I thought I was just making a comment. I didn't know that everything that I write will be analyzed and slandered against me."

Now, why is that, I wonder? Why when I make any comment, there's someone shining a flashlight up my ass, before writing that he or she is putting me on ignore?

"Assholes!"



From OJ to Kobe to Big Ben and countless others as long as they perform they do what they want. Key word is perform however.

Case in point Daryl Strawberry. Everyone knows the story; rookie of the year incredible talent and hard core cocaine user. Got busted enough times to have the rest of us in jail for life but somehow kept getting chances.

The Yankees (who else) gave him the last chance and he played well. Then after he retires he gets busted but guess what? Now he goes to jail. can;t hit the fastball anymore? All done get treated like the rest. When Big Ben inevitably screws up again after his career is over there will be hell to pay he got away with it the other times.

I could go on and on about Sheen as well and how this guy could never have gotten this bad off if his ass was locked up and he was forced to get help years ago but Sheen was on a funny ha-ha tv show so got away with carte blanche as well.

Also never worry about ignore. Mostly straight shooters get put on it. (and racist General board alts)
 
Last edited:
To get back on topic, I understand he wil try to claim diplomatic immunity. I don't believe it will fly, because he is not a diplomat. Employees of the IMF and similar organizations do have a certain degree of immunity, but it would not extend to this charge.
 
From OJ to Kobe to Big Ben and countless others as long as they perform they do what they want. Key word is perform however.

Case in point Daryl Strawberry. Everyone knows the story; rookie of the year incredible talent and hard core cocaine user. Got busted enough times to have the rest of us in jail for life but somehow kept getting chances.

The Yankees (who else) gave him the last chance and he played well. Then after he retires he gets busted but guess what? Now he goes to jail. can;t hit the fastball anymore? All done get treated like the rest. When Big Ben inevitably screws up again after his career is over there will be hell to pay he got away with it the other times.

I could go on and on about Sheen as well and how this guy could never have gotten this bad off if his ass was locked up and he was forced to get help years ago but Sheen was on a funny ha-ha tv show so got away with carte blanche as well.

Also never worry about ignore. Mostly straight shooters get put on it. (and racist General board alts)

Easy there, Lovecraft, be careful what you write, especially when quoting me. They may think that you actually like me and put you on... (gulp) ignore.
 
Easy there, Lovecraft, be careful what you write, especially when quoting me. They may think that you actually like me and put you on... (gulp) ignore.

Hey my wife grew up in Boston and has family in the North end so anyone that hangs out on Hanover street is okay by me! besides ignore in some cases is a badge of honor.
 
To get back on topic, I understand he wil try to claim diplomatic immunity. I don't believe it will fly, because he is not a diplomat. Employees of the IMF and similar organizations do have a certain degree of immunity, but it would not extend to this charge.

If found guilty, I hope he gets the book thrown at him. He could serve a year or two in wherever then get moved to finish his sentence in France, thus saving the USA some money.
 
From the New York Post:
Police: Maid picks IMF head Strauss-Kahn out of lineup in sex casePolice say the Manhattan hotel maid who accuses the head of the International Monetary Fund of sexually assaulting her in his luxury hotel room picked the Frenchman out of a lineup.

(By the way, the ass hole doesn't have diplomatic immunity.)
 
From the New York Post:
Police: Maid picks IMF head Strauss-Kahn out of lineup in sex casePolice say the Manhattan hotel maid who accuses the head of the International Monetary Fund of sexually assaulting her in his luxury hotel room picked the Frenchman out of a lineup.

(By the way, the ass hole doesn't have diplomatic immunity.)

Yeah.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/15/us-strausskahn-immunity-idUSTRE74E38220110515

And, hopefully he will be considered such an extreme flight risk he will not be allowed bail. :)

Of course, he must be considered innocent until proven guilty, but the evidence against him is pretty strong.
 
From the New York Post:
Police: Maid picks IMF head Strauss-Kahn out of lineup in sex casePolice say the Manhattan hotel maid who accuses the head of the International Monetary Fund of sexually assaulting her in his luxury hotel room picked the Frenchman out of a lineup.

(By the way, the ass hole doesn't have diplomatic immunity.)

Tell you what is sad is that I am already surprised they are pushing this as if he were a nobody. We have gotten to a point where we are so conditioned to watch these pricks walk that it is a breath of fresh air when they get nailed. Kudos to her for sticking with this.

So diplomatic immunity allows you to rape a citizen of another country? That is just ducky. So glad I have guns and have no fear of using them. When it comes to the "law" I have a me and mine mentality if something happens to a family member I will be damned if I will let it be handled by the "law".

In saying that I will go a little further in that I never blame police officers for this because I know several and nothing makes them sicker than busting some piece of shit for rape, and assault and anything else and watch the lawyers and judges let them walk.

So props to everyone involved in this so far. I don;t get into politics as much but I wonder if Frances already unsavory reputation here amongst the average Joe will play into effect here with how the US handles this. We already see them as slimy cowards I think there would be a hue and cry if he walked.
 
Ten years for Rape and twenty five for being French!

That is of he did it and isn't being set up by Sarcozy? :)
 
Ten years for Rape and twenty five for being French!

That is of he did it and isn't being set up by Sarcozy? :)

Yes definitely less time for rape. He can make amends for rape but he will be French for life!

Now honestly I am waiting for this story; he says he was waiting for a prostitute to show up dressed as a maid. he came out assumed she was the pro and thought she was "role playing!" Hey another plot bunny for non consent!

really this would not surprise me.
 
Yes definitely less time for rape. He can make amends for rape but he will be French for life!

Now honestly I am waiting for this story; he says he was waiting for a prostitute to show up dressed as a maid. he came out assumed she was the pro and thought she was "role playing!" Hey another plot bunny for non consent!

really this would not surprise me.

If he called out, either from the hotel room or from his cell phone, there will be a record of that. If there is no record, he is lying to save his ass and it will be proven.

If he really did call out for a call girl, that might be extenuating circumstances.
 
5/15/2011
The court date for a French political big-shot accused of sexually assaulting a hotel maid was put off until tomorrow while authorities examine him at a hospital for evidence.
 
International Monetary Fucker. Excuse: "I didn't know it was rape, I thought she was French."
 
5/15/2011
The court date for a French political big-shot accused of sexually assaulting a hotel maid was put off until tomorrow while authorities examine him at a hospital for evidence.

He agreed to the examination, which might have been a dumb move on his part. I'm not sure what they're looking for. His DNA, definitrely, and maybe scratches and her saliva on his cock. She fought back, and they might have taken scrapings from under her fingernails.

I wonder how a Socialist can justify spending $3,000 dollars for a hotel room for one night. :confused: I'm not getting political, by the way. He could just as well have been a conservative; they're all bums. There's probably nothing political about the woman's accusation, but he is a member of the Socialist Party.
 
Back
Top