'Israel’s Window to Bomb Iran'

eyer

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Posts
21,263
October 3, 2011

Exclusive: Israeli leaders continue to pound the drum about taking out Iran’s nuclear program – and some hardliners may want to strike soon, fearing the window of opportunity will close if President Barack Obama wins reelection and is less susceptible to political pressures, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern observes.

By Ray McGovern

There are mounting signs that the right-wing Israeli government may think the timing is right for an attack on Iran, with growing alarms inside Israel about alleged Iranian progress on building a nuclear bomb – and with President Barack Obama fearing loss of key Jewish political support in 2012 if he doesn’t go along.

On Sept. 26, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterated Iran’s alleged progress, telling interviewer Charlie Rose that “time is short” before Iran obtains nuclear weapons and poses a direct threat to Israel and the rest of the world.

Yet, the key factor in any Israeli decision to send its aircraft and missiles to Iran is the degree to which Netanyahu and other hard-line Likud leaders believe that President Obama is locked into giving blanket support to Israel — particularly as Election 2012 draws near.

The Israelis might well conclude that the formidable effectiveness of the Likud Lobby and kneejerk support of the U.S. Congress as well as still powerful neoconservatives in the Executive Branch (and on the opinion pages of major American newspapers) amount to solid assurance of automatic support for pretty much anything Israel decides to do.

If Israel translates this into a green light to attack Iran, the rest of the world — even Washington — may get little or no warning.[/quote]

Remember when Saddam translated Bush 41's perceived nonchalance as a green light to attack Kuwait?

Rest of the story here:

http://consortiumnews.com/2011/10/03/israels-window-to-bomb-iran/
 
For the last several years, numerous 'windows' have been speculated for Israeli action against Iran's nuclear facilities; and each has passed without incident, the latest being this past month of September.

I have grown tired of reading the speculations, trying to comprehend all the factors and consequences, so I suspect this 'window' will pass also and what will be, will be, que sara, sara.

ami
 
Sooner or later Israel or the U.S will have to take the terrorist regime out.

Iran will have no qualms about bombing Israel and not care about any moslems who did as collateral damage.

Never Again
 
I don't think a strike against Iran is necessary. Iran knows Israel will turn them into a speck of dust if they launch a nuclear attack. They might be crazy but they aren't stupid. I think.
 
Sooner or later Israel or the U.S will have to take the terrorist regime out.

Iran will have no qualms about bombing Israel and not care about any moslems who did as collateral damage.

Never Again

Jewnews/newspeak/mainstream media has been oh so effective.

As the lemmings continue their march.....................


It was the Israeli Irgun that introduced terrorism to the Middle East.
 

It was the Israeli Irgun that introduced terrorism to the Middle East.

*snort* *dietcokespew*

Bwahahahahahahaha!

Oh my freaking Gawd, that's classic. I'm sorry -- I know you meant it quite seriously and all -- but that's the funniest thing I've read here so far this morning.

Tickled in Tel Aviv,
Ellie
 
I don't think a strike against Iran is necessary. Iran knows Israel will turn them into a speck of dust if they launch a nuclear attack. They might be crazy but they aren't stupid. I think.

If Iran launched a nuclear attack against Israel, Israel would be able to retaliate, sure, but... there still wouldn't be much of it left after getting nuked. It's a tiny place, and its bombed-out remains would be vulnerable to decimation by the rest of its oh, so friendly neighbors. Iran on the other hand, would be able to recover more easily, especially given all the support it would get from its fellow Islamic regimes in the region, delighted with the extermination of Jews.

I personally wouldn't hold it against Israel one bit for launching peremptory bunker-busters at Iranian nuclear development sites. It's probably better than just waiting for Iran to finish developing its weapons and then crossing our fingers that it's not fanatical enough to start a chain of mushroom clouds lighting up the Middle East.

This is, after all, Ahmadinejad we're dealing with. This is a man who came to a liberal college campus in the United States and, with a straight face, said there were no homosexuals in Iran, and expected people to believe him. This is not a man in touch with reality.

Concerned in Constantinople,
Ellie
 
Last edited:
If Iran launched a nuclear attack against Israel, Israel would be able to retaliate, sure, but... there still wouldn't be much of it left after getting nuked. It's a tiny place, and its bombed-out remains would be vulnerable to decimation by the rest of its oh, so friendly neighbors. Iran on the other hand, would be able to recover more easily, especially given all the support it would get from its fellow Islamic regimes in the region, delighted with the extermination of Jews.

I personally wouldn't hold it against Israel one bit for launching peremptory bunker-busters at Iranian nuclear development sites. It's probably better than just waiting for Iran to finish developing its weapons and then crossing our fingers that it's not fanatical enough to start a chain of mushroom clouds lighting up the Middle East.

This is, after all, Ahmadinejad we're dealing with. This is a man who came to a liberal college campus in the United States and, with a straight face, said there were no homosexuals in Iran, and expected people to believe him. This is not a man in touch with reality.

Concerned in Constantinople,
Ellie

However....if Israel launched a retaliatory nuclear strike against Iran, there would be nothing left to recover from. Think multiple warheads.

Jittery in Jerusalem,

Miles
 
Back
Top