oggbashan
Dying Truth seeker
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2002
- Posts
- 56,017
Og,
Out of ignorance I will ask the question. What are the financial and aestetic drawbacks to replacing ALL of your green tiles with red and selling the green? Obviously there is labor costs involved, but if the tiles are that valuable, maybe you could get a new roof without a major financial outlay and get any other issues fixed at the same time. Not to mention that it should reduce the trauma of getting additional work done in the future for less cost.
That's a reasonable question but it isn't that simple. My neighbour's house and mine are almost clones, using the same architect, but my house was built in 1939 and his was built in 1949 probably using left-over tiles from pre-war. The green Belgian tiles are valuable to us two but most of the very few houses in a twenty-five mile radius that had the Belgian tiles had already been re-roofed many years ago in modern UK tiling. I suspect that the architect/builder used those green tiles because he bought them as a job lot in 1938/9. I originally thought that it would be easy to get reclaimed replacements but not only are our roof tiles an unusual colour but they are a non-standard size, at least in England. There are new and reclaimed tiles that look similar but the dimensions are different enough to make mixing them impossible.
At the moment and probably for the next ten to fifteen years my roof, including the temporary fibreglass fix to the valley, is waterproof and sound. The few cracked tiles don't matter because there is a large overlap between the tiles. The problem has been of our own making. Both houses were soundly built and have been well maintained by the current and previous owners so the roofs had not been allowed to deteriorate to a state that required complete replacement. If I could get fifty tiles of the correct dimensions my roof would probably last another 70 years.
Og

