Isolated Blurt Thread

[Honey123]

Huh?

Sorry, i was busy........

lol...............

 

[damppanties]

It's amazing how if you keep busy, you just don't think about it so much.

 

[Honey123]

Dampy!!!!!

((hugs))

 

[impressive]

I have a problem with people who just take (or demand) and never give (or offer) anything back.

 

[matriarch]

I have a problem with people who just take (or demand) and never give (or offer) anything back.

Whaddya want??

 

[impressive]

Whaddya want??

I want people to be generous instead of self-absorbed twits.

 

[matriarch]

I want people to be generous instead of self-absorbed twits.

*blink*
Yes'm
*blink*

 

[MaeveoSliabh]

I want people to be generous instead of self-absorbed twits.

But i LIKE being a self-absorbed twit!

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

Dampy!!!!!

((hugs))

Hey, our gorgeous Honey is back! With a lovely new AV to remind us, as if we could ever forget! Something sultry about that long, wavy hair and naked back.

 

[Fallenfromgrace]

so...1st exam today...and what and of the 3 q's of 6 i had to answer...only one of them was something i had revised thoroughly...ah well...we'll see eh...

exam was meh...and then the fucking fire alarm went off...so we all had to interupt our 'flow' (or in my case our staring at the q in horror) and go to the main square...there...fucking shits rushed to waterstones to look up info in the books, and the rest of us conferred over what to write for a particular q *snicker* then to some people's disgust we were informed there was in fact, no fire and that we were to return to complete the exam with an extension on the time.

I think there are going to be some pretty angry emails lobbyed at the department. Some will say

''James, if you fucking make us sit that exam again i will garrotte you. and you will die a painfully slow death.''

and others will say

''With all due respect James, if you don't fucking discount that exam...i will garrotte you. etc etc''

~~ others still will say

''Dear James, if you intend to replace that exam with a courswork due in for May...i will love you forever...and yes that also means physically...but only only once physically coz im a lesbian''

wonder which one he'd adhere to most?...



~~ that aside...i wrote some utter bullshit about syntactic plausibility and some even greater shit for spatial attention with regards to visual determination...!!!

lmao...well...ha. we shall see. the ogod point is, is that if i've failed...so has most of the year...

 

[English Lady]

I want people to be generous instead of self-absorbed twits.

Same here -but you know, I feel kinda sorry for the self absorbed twits, they'll never feel the good, pure feeling that you get when you give.

giving rocks!

 

[Fallenfromgrace]

On a more relaed note...

I have various writting projects i want to get sorted soon...

The most urgent:
1) (for the comp!) 2358 words of my Vday comp entry, and that's not even sex yet. I haven't self edited this much coz i feel its coming out how i want it to.

2)3371 words of part 3 of 'For You My Love' (part 2 is in editing and ive refused to look at it till after my exams!- but i want it up soon, so part 3 can go up )


3) 625 words about NYE i want that up asap- before vday maybe (unlikely)

4) (march i think) 1346 words of my 1st AH story and it's coming out great, BUT i am eing a bitch to myself in terms of self editing. I've never highlighted my own work so much!!!!

5) (april i think) have yet to commit to word my 2nd AH story, this one is going to be Non erotic

6) (would like this up before may exams) 737 words of a 1st person (possible email correspondence) story about my lecturer.

This last one i dont plan to even attempt to tackle till 2008. This is because i want to get FYML under my belt, and gain readership from the comp

26,000 words of a story i didnt really like when i wrote it, to edit up to scratch. Its still a work in progress (despite the word count!) and ive had some developmental ideas which should spice it up a bit.

~~ neways i guess all of the above was for my reference really...lol...getting it all out on the screen helps put my writting year in perspective...its gonna be a busy 1st 6 months, i know that.

 

[inlovewithyourghost]

God... please make her nightmares stop... make her pain stop...
let me be strong enough to not let her see me cry...

 

[Guest]

I'm getting really tired of coming in second to your job... and no, calling me and asking me to meet you for lunch does not make up for you working 4 1/2 hours over when it's not necessary and you don't even get fucking paid for it and I'm sitting here wondering if you're in a ditch somewhere because you don't even have the decency to call and tell me you're working over.

 

[Nirvanadragones]

God... please make her nightmares stop... make her pain stop...
let me be strong enough to not let her see me cry...

I'll light a candle for her

and tears are healing, remember?

 

[impressive]

Same here -but you know, I feel kinda sorry for the self absorbed twits, they'll never feel the good, pure feeling that you get when you give.

I agree.

giving rocks!

You said a mouthful, there!

 

[Nirvanadragones]

It's storming so badly outside I don't know how I'm going to get home tonight.

Then again, why do I need to get home?

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

I don't know the circumstances, but I'm sure glad that you're with us, Vana. Nice AV, too.

 

[Nirvanadragones]

I don't know the circumstances, but I'm sure glad that you're with us, Vana. Nice AV, too.

Thank you, Sweet.

 

[Roxanne Appleby]

If i wrote the following in an essay...would it make sense?

Chomsky's paradigm is a theory of language itself, not its uses- a model of language competence not language performance one might consider.

Semantic plausibility of a sentance is a key factor in comprehension of language, yet Chomsky would disregard the thought that semantic knowledge has an impact on verification times for the parsing of the grammatical structure of a sentence- or syntax, as his theory is implicitly nativist- suggesting that language comprehension employs an innate mechanism and therefore there is no requirement for semantic plausibility to be assesed seperately.

However, semantic plausibility of syntax aside, semantic analysis of the sentence- or the pragmatics of the language within the sentence is essentially how meaning is garnered from language uttered by others. Written or spoken, one uses such mechanisms to draw out meaning in order for the 'language' to be acted upon.

~~ no...? didnt think so...makes jack all sense to me either...and i wrote it.

I dunno, it makes sense to me. Personally, I might simplify at follows:

"Chomsky's an ass."

Which is true, but in the one field he actually knows something about - language - he is at least an interesting thinker. So I'd say you're good.

 

[Fallenfromgrace]

I dunno, it makes sense to me. Personally, I might simplify at follows:

"Chomsky's an ass."

Which is true, but in the one field he actually knows something about - language - he is at least an interesting thinker.

Now why didnt you tell me Chomsky's an ass before i wrote the exam?! thanks Rox...now ive failed for sure.

psssht.

 

[Roxanne Appleby]

Wrong thread I know, but my mood is "satisfyingly busy" - I can't even catch up any further with this thread right now.

 

[Fallenfromgrace]

YES!

 

[damppanties]

YES!

What did you do?

 

[Fallenfromgrace]

What did you do?

its what she did that counts whisper in my ear and i may tell you