BlackShanglan
Silver-Tongued Papist
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2004
- Posts
- 16,888
Roxanne Appleby said:(Interesting, a superficial google does not find that quote.)
I'll spare you some effort by observing that it's the very devil to track down. I have it on the audio recording of Stephen Fry reading De Profundis and "The Ballad of Reading Gaol," but it does not appear in any online version of De Profundis I've been able to track down, including the copy on Project Gutenberg (which is usually a reliable source). I suspect that the issue may be that the work exists in more than one version. Wilde sent the letter from prison and never published it; a friend later edited and published it, after Wilde's death if I remember correctly. My hunch is that the words - beautiful ones - are in one version and not the other. Intriguingly, I can find parts of the quotation online in reference in other works, but not in the full text. It's exceedingly teasing, as I love that passage above all - and it's the one that is so difficult to track down. I can't even just order a copy of De Profundis, as I have no way of knowing if the passages I want are in it.
BTW, there is a lot of sentimentalism expressed here, and it rarely makes me uncomfortable, because I see it as sincere efforts to express real feelings, perhaps in conventional forms that are not the most ideal, but sincere nevertheless. Just don't want anyone here thinking that I'm dissing their sentimental expressions. I usually can intuit the real feeling behind the words, and usually am touched by them.
In the sense that Wilde used it, "sentimentalism" is distinct from "sentiment." Emotions are fine, and Wilde celebrates them. He means only the sort of false, ultimately hollow show of sentiment that is not really there. Anything with real feeling behind it has nothing to fear from him.
Shanglan



